Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Broken Saints (2001–2003)
7/10
An interesting experiment but sophomoric and self-important.
6 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
An interesting experiment but sophomoric and self-important. As Brooke Burgess implies, he has traveled the world and found the truth...now he seeks to enlighten us all with his vision.

The writing is self indulgent and sophomoric, smarmy and preachy. It all boils down to love and God and religion and faith. BS. Just like the ending of The fifth Element, love solves everything. God is in us all. In the end we will see the light (it's all there in digital code), and the warriors will lay down their weapons and the Muslims will join with the Hebrews and Christians and Buddhists and get together and throw one big party. And the lamb shall lay down with the lion, but not without a bit of bloodshed first..,eh.

The artwork is poor graphic novel style; I liked the scenes that were done in sketch work better than the stylized simplistic artwork that prevailed throughout the most of the movie. They call it flash animation but it was hardly animated.One episode of South park has more animation than the whole 12 hours or so of this movie and it's more realistic in the style.

That all being said, this movie does stand up as a sci-fi kind of epic. The character developments are excellent and their interaction is well done especially the dynamic between Raimi and Oran. This was a grand experiment that the three creators conspired to. It is very geeky and was well received on the internet over the 3 or so years it unfolded. I suspect that this has a great deal to do with its current popularity; after all you don't follow a story, released piecemeal for 3 years, waiting eagerly from week to week to see the next segment, and then admit it wasn't worth the wait.

The three creators, especially Brooke Burgess, are all waiting with their collective breaths held to see who will pick up their project and turn it into a movie or a TV series. They can taste the fortune. So much for altruism. With programming in this country (US) controlled by the likes of clear channel, it probably will be. For their sakes I hope that the writer and co-creators can keep their own vision intact, and not have to bow down to the almighty film industry and turn this into a more watered down and more preachy version.

All in all this project was a success. I don't think it was deep and life changing as many would have you believe; but it was entertaining...it had to be to keep me entertained for the whole 12 or so hours.I recommend at least renting this story.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
worthless, boring and artsy - (what rhymes with artsy?)
25 February 2005
Nothing happens in this movie. Well, almost nothing. You get to watch three guys urinate for a few minutes. That's about as exciting as it gets. That's not all though; no. You get to watch a cripple walk slowly for about a fifth of the film. She trudges up stairs and through hallways tragically and with singular non-purposefulness. You get to watch people watching people watch movies. The movies they watch are better than watching them watch the movies. Skip watching this film and watch the movies that the people in the film are watching instead. Those at least look somewhat entertaining. I would recommend this movie to anyone who wants to shoot themselves in the head.
14 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flywheel (2003)
1/10
manipulative, unrealistic, fantasy
20 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
If you enjoy being manipulated by a director, you'll enjoy this movie. A used car salesman shamelessly shafts people, is a brute to his family and demoralizes his employees... until he has a change of heart; Praise the lord! He is saved. The acting is mediocre; the production values a joke and wardrobe... a raid on the khaki factory. You are manipulated at every turn as the director blatantly pulls emotional strings.

This movie deserves a vote of about 2. The car lot owner decides he is a bad man, (naughty, evil, baddie) and turns a new leaf. He starts selling the junk cars at fair market value, and even returns money to previous purchasers, (yeah, that'll happen), because the lord runs the car lot now. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. A complete fantasy. Jesus, Mary, and God himself reward this man by sending streams of customers in to his car lot to purchase ALL of his cars seconds before the bank is ready to foreclose.

This movie shoves religion in your face. Preaches that if only you repent, God, (and everyone you stepped over on your way to riches) will reward you with even more fortune and fame. What a #@$**! bad movie!
15 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frankenstein (2004)
The best version of the movie so far...
21 November 2004
This version of Frankenstein is by far the best and truest version of the classic book written by Mary Shelley; both in content and intent. A true feeling for the period that this book was written in can be felt in this film. This is not the "Hollywood-let's re-write the story-Kennith Brannagh, DeNero-version" and it is not overacted. It is the story as it was meant to be told; with all the pathos, depth and empathy that it was intended to inspire, as well as horror. I am impressed by Alec Newman,(dune) once again, and Luke Goss gives an outstanding performance. Sutherland and Hurt, as always, shine. Finally, there is a more-than-watchable version of the first true science fiction story ever written.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed