Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Passions (1994)
9/10
Oddly captivating movie: strange, eccentric and beautiful
29 June 2008
I really loved this movie, though it's hard to know where to begin to describe it. It has minimal plot, at least certainly nothing terribly concrete and linear that wraps up in a nice little denouement. Instead the story loosely revolves around two women - Fioletta and Lilia ("Violet" and "Lily," in English) - as well as various other people who gather at a horse racing track (called a hippodrome) somewhere near the Black Sea coast. The main thematic backdrop in the film is horses, horse racing and a certain sporting and romantic rivalry amongst the young jockeys, but from there the film branches into a more surreal landscape of eccentric people telling odd tales, philosophizing, betting and wagering, boasting, plotting and scheming, or just plain BS-ing.

The two main women, Violet and Lily, are both attractive and engaging in their own special ways. Violet is apparently a circus performer, currently laid up in a medical sanatorium with a leg injury, but she is soon released, and along with Lily, one of the nurses at the sanatorium, they go to visit a nearby horse racing establishment.

Probably the most intriguing character for me is Lily, played by Renata Litvinova. She plays a nurse who works at the nearby sanatorium - a place which apparently has a morgue. She's a platinum blonde, and a quite attractive one at that, who conjures up images of Jean Harlow, Marilyn Monroe, and Kelly Bundy (okay, Christina Applegate, "Married With Children."). She has the most wonderful airy and breathy voice, not unlike Marilyn Monroe's, which she uses to tell some exquisitely odd stories that just seem to come out of nowhere. There is the story of an earlier acquaintance in her life, a certain Rita Gothier, who died young and had an autopsy performed on her in the morgue of the very sanatorium at which Lily is working. It's a terribly sad story, made all the more dreadful by the fact that some rascal of a coroner deliberately flicked a cigarette butt into the stomach of the open cadaver, which was then duly sewn up by his assistants. Then there was the story of the teenage boy who, due to a love gone bad, hanged himself from a tree, yet he was so skinny and lacking in body fat, that his body didn't decompose but just stayed hanging on the branch, mummifying... Or, the story about Lily's former boyfriend who, for God only knows what reason, kept bringing her an assortment of loaded guns to keep, which she was forced to hide in her aunt's home in some most creative ways. Then one day the boyfriend said horrible words to her and apparently vanished, but this cryptic info is neither explained nor explored further.

But that's the way this movie goes: odd stories abound, eccentric characters appear with little or no explanation of their background, their motivations, their reason for being. There's even a delightfully daft old photographer, a certain Volodya, who goes around showing photos of mythical beasts - half horse, half man - and insisting that they are real.

The character of Lily the nurse was probably the most compelling for me. First, she was quite beautiful - a Nordic sort of blonde coupled with a hard-to-define Slavic exoticism - and I couldn't take my eyes off of her. Second, she had a beautiful voice, and I loved listening to her tell her stories, odd though they were. And lastly, her monologues were just wonderful to listen to in Russian, as that is what first brought me to this movie: I wanted to listen to spoken Russian, a language I have been studying for quite some time now. Wow, what I wouldn't give to have Lily as my Russian tutor! (I noticed that some of the Russian was awkwardly translated in the subtitles, but no matter, it made for some unexpected humor that probably only English speakers of Russian will "get," but will no doubt enjoy.)

The film is visually sumptuous, nicely filmed with great use of light and colors, and includes some long drawn-out montage shots of horses milling about that are just so natural, and so lovingly done. Sound plays a noticeable part in this film as well. Here and there in parts are heard excerpts from a great Beethoven symphony, yet also occasionally are heard in the background a cacophony of war noises: gunshots, automatic weapons fire, missiles, etc. - for no apparent reason, and without explanation. Also, apparently in keeping with director Kira Muratova's style, characters will often say words or phrases over and over again, for no apparent reason other than perhaps because that's just the way Muratova does things... It all makes little sense, yet I didn't feel it marred the film in any way, instead adding to the overall whimsical and eccentric nature of the film.

Anyway, a nicely done film, one that I will long remember. My only regret is that there are not more films like this one, as often times it's the odd, whimsical tale that can bring one the greatest joy.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Heartbreak Ridge: a musical comedy about…. U.S. Marines
19 November 2005
Folks, I shouldn't even be here. I should be dead -- dead from laughing so hard at this uber-silly movie, that is. Hey, can a person actually die laughing? Don't know, but this movie surely would be a great way to test that question.

An aging Clint Eastwood, playing a discipline-challenged U.S. Marine Corps gunnery sergeant named Tom Highway (as in, "it's my way or the Highway"), gets a new lease on military life by being assigned to lead a bunch of Marine recon soldiers who are even more lacking in the discipline department than he is. The premise is so unrealistic it defies belief. The thing that strikes me is that every one of them – Eastwood's gunny sergeant included – should have been mustered out of the Corps a long, long time ago. But had that happened, we wouldn't have a movie now, would we?

So what we get is a movie that is so silly, so unashamedly ludicrous ("The Dirty Dozen" and "Major Payne" come to mind), that it actually had me glued to the tube just to see how far they were going to go with it. They went pretty far. All the way to Grenada and back. It was just layer upon layer of war-movie clichés, stereotypes, funny names, oddballs in uniform, snappy one-liners, military jargon and crude language, all against a backdrop of a Marine Corps that could only exist in some sort of mystical alternate universe (I think that place is known as Hollywood). *Note in the trivia section that both the U.S. Army and the U.S. Marine Corps disavowed this film.

All said, though, I actually recommend this movie! So bad it was... really bad, but hey, it was still quite funny and should be especially amusing to those of you who were ever in the service. I myself was in the Navy - the parent company of the Marines, BTW.

I would love to watch this movie in a room full of current and former grunts – especially the Recon types. I bet the laughter would be excruciating. Incidentally, after seeing this movie, I'm wondering why the U.S. Marine Corps even has to bother with recruiting drives. Why are they always begging for "a few good men" when it's obvious that the U.S. Marine Corps is actually just one big laugh riot? Who knew?? I'm surprised people aren't joining up in droves.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Columbo: An Exercise in Fatality (1974)
Season 4, Episode 1
10/10
My favorite Columbo episode.
23 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is my favorite Columbo episode. This really ought to be on DVD, I would love to add it to my permanent movie library.

To some extent it's hard to believe that this film dates from 1974 - wow, over 30 years ago already! - since the picture quality is still quite sharp and vivid, and watching it today, you almost get the sense that time has not passed since its filming. But then of course it's quite apparent that this must have happened in some previous generation: just get a load of Milo Janus's (Robert Conrad) widely flared pants, the phone tape-recording and teleprinter equipment that today would nearly qualify for antique status, not to mention some of the huge Detroit-built cars Also, as another reviewer pointed out, the then "state of the art" gym equipment in Milo Janus's gyms was vastly different from the rather exotic and high tech stuff you'll find nowadays in modern fitness centers.

But I love this episode so much, for several reasons. Firstly, I myself had discovered the wonderful world of weightlifting right about the time period this movie was shot (early 70's) and I really enjoyed the walk down memory lane, seeing the gym with the free-weights and stuff. I also liked the weightlifting "accident" which the perp concocted to cover the murder.

Secondly, this particular episode had much more of an aura of realism about it than other Columbo episodes. There was nothing really far-fetched about the crime - neither the motive for it, nor the execution of it, nor Janus's attempts to create a plausible cover-up. I don't know, maybe it was the way Robert Conrad conducted himself so coolly, so Teflon-coated cocky, much like in his battery commercials which some of you may remember from back then ("I dare you to knock it off my shoulder"). But it all seemed so very real.

I've seen this episode several times, and I am always struck at the palpable chemistry between Columbo and Janus: they really truly seem to loathe each other, and the scene in the hospital where Columbo very publicly confronts Janus and accuses him of the crime always seems chillingly believable. You can't help but wonder if the real actors here (Falk and Conrad) actually despised each other off the set?

The final resolution of the case (something to do with the way shoelaces are tied) was a bit extreme, but taken against the greater context in which 'whodunnits' nearly always require at least some sort of clever if not sensationalistic ending, it definitely fit the bill.

Oh, and one other thing: I always love the part where Columbo digs the evidence (in this case, several pairs of old shoes) out of his paper lunch bag. In the process he pulls out a cellophane-wrapped hunk of lord-knows-what, to which he comments, almost as if to himself, "That's just my lunch, that don't mean nothing." Bon appetit, Columbo!
53 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting comedy/drama movie from several angles
8 April 2005
I enjoyed this movie, thanks in large part to the fact that I saw it on FX channel, on their "DVD on TV" movie night, where those two hosts (can't remember their names...) give you supplementary facts and other commentary about the movie during the commercial breaks.

The story was actually fairly engrossing: Angelina Jolie's character (Lanie Kerrigan), who is a news reporter, is told by some strange street prophet, Jack (played by Tony Shaloub), that she will die in a week. The story unfolds as she proceeds to live her rather hectic, self-absorbed life interspersed with romance, a somewhat strained relationship with her father and sister, and the ever-present wonderment as to whether Jack the Prophet will be correct in his prophecy that Lanie will in fact die in a week. In other words, the movie does manage to keep you on the hook right up to the very end. (The ending was a bit lame, but still had a good message if you care to adjust yourself to it.)

Jolie's character, Lanie, is interesting, because if you watch the movie more than once, you will most likely start to be intrigued by her appearance: the platinum blonde hair, the puffy lips, the expressive eyes, the makeup.... you might start to think she resembles Marilyn Monroe, or, you may just write her off as a woman who actually looks a bit like an attractive transvestite(!). But no matter, because whether you like Angelina Jolie or not, you can't help but be a bit intrigued by the appearance of her character, which is kind of "out there" for Jolie. One potential problem, though, is that she is possibly TOO out there, to the point where she may distract the viewer from seeing the message of the movie

Tony Shaloub's character, Jack the Prophet, is very well portrayed by Mr. Shaloub. He's lovably wacko, and plus he has some pretty funny lines in spite of his plight in life. I like the Ed Burns character, Pete, because he reflects reality, whereas Jolie's character is kind of too unreal, but still fun to watch.

I liked the setting of the movie, Seattle, since I live in Seattle. For those of us who live in the rainy city, it's fun to see an interesting movie that takes place in our environs. They also used actual news people from a local Seattle TV station, so it was kind of fun to see people whom I've been seeing on the local nightly news actually appear in a Hollywood movie. They changed their real names, though, which was kind of weird.

There were a few things I didn't like about the movie, the main one being that Lanie, who works as a modern-day TV reporter, comes across to me as just way too much of a sex-pot, I mean just way outside the realm of reality. It gets to be jarring after awhile to see such a sexy creature being passed off as a news reporter when we all KNOW that no modern local news station would put such a pouty, platinum-haired blonde on the air (....or WOULD they??? as Conan O'Brien would say.) But mainly I liked the movie, and it was actually worth a repeat viewing, as it kind of grows on you, and ultimately makes you THINK about your own life, your own values, your personal destiny, etc. BTW, there's a pretty good batch of songs that accompanied the movie too, though I don't believe there is an actual soundtrack available, so you will probably have to hunt down each song individually.

All in all an interesting movie, with a message worth pondering - if you can get past the steady distraction of the appearance of Angelina Jolie, of course.

Well, that's my review. You guys have been a great audience, thanks for listening!
27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
All that glitters is not gold
15 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those great old movies that is worth a repeat viewing every now and again in a person's life. Sure, much of the acting and dialog have gotten corny and dated over the years, and I agree with one of the previous commenters who said that Bogart's acting seems very forced - like he's obviously just reading lines from script. Be that as it may, the story that is told here is every bit as important and thought provoking as something from the Bible. Throughout the film there is a spot-on wisdom about man and his endless quest for wealth (in this case, gold). I always come away from this movie feeling secure in my belief that in life you just can't have it all, and all that glitters is not gold (i.e. there are things in life more important than money).

Since this movie was largely about lost fortunes (literally "dust in the wind" if you think about the end sequence), it must have made quite an impression on audiences back in the forties when it was released. I'm sure more than a few viewers back then still had painful memories of catastrophic losses caused by the 1929 stock market crash and the ensuing Depression of the 1930's. Also, many people lost a lot in the war years that followed, and which predated this movie by just a few years.

That's why I think this movie qualifies for repeat viewings, because just think how appropriate this wisdom is for our current generation of people: just consider the losses from, say, the stock market crash of 2000, the events of September 11th, and of course we just witnessed the horrific losses caused by the Asian tsunami... the cycle repeats. Fortunes come and go, gold is often times nothing but dust in the wind, but life goes on and so man must go on. That's what this movie says to me whenever I see it.
37 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed