Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Shake a leg, guys!
28 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
In the 16th century, Shakespeare's plays were oftentimes seen as base entertainment, with little value or profundity to be gained from. However, they have stood the test of time and today are recognized as some of the finest works of literature in the history of civilization. Through his plays, Shakespeare was not making an attempt to say anything profound; he simply was trying to tell a story that would entertain the audiences, rich and poor, who came to see his work. More recently, comedies like Andaz Apna Apna which are hailed as classics today were trashed upon their release. It is unjustified for film critics to trash Chennai Express. The film is obviously not meant to be an artistic piece of work; its sole purpose is to provide you with laughs for its duration and thus hopefully brighten up your day. And that it does with flying colors; Chennai Express is truly a laugh riot from start to finish, that makes clever application of pop culture gags and slick slapstick humor that makes for a fun roller coaster ride.

Chennai Express begins with a 40-year-old man named Rahul (SRK, who else, playing his age for once), who must travel to Rameshwaram in Tamil Nadu to immerse the ashes of his deceased grandfather. On the way, however, certain comic misunderstandings lead him to the company of Meenamma (Deepika Padukone) and her goon cousin brothers who perfect the Tamil movie look down to the lungis and the coconut knives. The goons hold him as hostage and along with Meenamma, take him to their village Komban, where Meenamma's father is the local don. In order to save Rahul's life, Meenamma cooks up some more stories that lead to greater chaos and a wild chase through the beautiful scenery of rural Tamil Nadu.

From start to finish, Chennai Express is an adrenaline rush. Director Rohit Shetty exceeds the fast-paced hilarious chaos of Golmaal and Bol Bachchan with this. Shahrukh Khan's self-referential jokes, the various Kollywood spoofs, and the slapstick humor all mesh together seamlessly into a tight fabric. The story (yes, you snarky little critics, there is a story) has been kept simple in its overall structure, allowing the narrative to be highlighted by specific incidents. There's very little in terms of theme to be mentioned here; as mentioned previously, the film isn't really trying to say anything life-changing or thought-provoking. While it does have small messages regarding living one's life to the fullest and making the best out of bad situations, such themes are handled in a very light vein and are not dwelt upon with much gravity. The music by Vishal-Shekhar is a mixed bag; while the title song, "Lungi Dance", "Titli", and "Kashmir Main Tu Kanyakumari" are great colorful fun, "One Two Three Four" grates on the nerves after a while and "Tera Rasta Main Chhodoon Na" is sleep-inducing. Another highlight of the film that is of an unusually high quality for this genre is the cinematography, which has surprisingly been paid great attention to. Be it the lush green landscapes of the village, or the silhouettes of the sunset at Rameshwaram, the contrast depicted here is first-class.

Performances here are also first-rate. Shahrukh Khan is as usual, at the top of his game. This is a relief from Jab Tak Hai Jaan and Ra.One, and we get to see him in his element; fun, playful and true- blue SRK without the oddities of the aforementioned films. It's quite fun to see him take digs at his own exaggerated archetype and his own image in the public media. The last time he was this much fun was Om Shanti Om! Deepika Padukone also springs in a pleasant surprise with a performance that provides her with uncharted territory; while she may have received the award for "Ram Leela", her work here is much more superlative in my book because it is much more unique. She matches SRK step for step in the comic department; hopefully we get to see more of this side of her as opposed to the dull, brooding characters she has played in the past. Yes, the accent may not be regionally accurate, but her successful efforts in making Meenamma an endearing character more than makes up for this deficiency. Tamil veteran Satyaraj evokes an aura of menace as the godfather of Komban, while the actor who plays Tangaballi (the goon whom Meenamma is betrothed to) doesn't have much to do in terms of acting; his work consists more of just grunting and appearing scary. Several other characters in the film make their mark; be it Meenamma's cousin brothers, the midget, the Sardar cop, or even Rahul's grandparents at the very beginning. It truly is a team effort, and all the key players have worked cooperatively to make this worthwhile.

Don't be fooled by snooty critics who see "Chennai Express" as something only for the single-screen audience. Comedy doesn't have any restrictions; it can be enjoyed by everyone regardless of class, wealth, or education level as long as one is willing to watch it with the right frame of mind. You can't go into "Chennai Express" expecting a National-Award winning performance or the solution to the suffering of all humanity. The success phenomenon called Rohit Shetty exists because his audiences have realized what he intends to do; make them laugh and perhaps bring some happiness in the mundane, stressful life of the viewer. So just sit back, relax, and "get on the train, baby!"
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
PK (2014)
8/10
And the crusade continues...
25 December 2014
Warning: Spoilers
After stepping out of a Rajkumar Hirani film, one is usually overcome with feelings of optimism for the future; be it Munnabhai MBBS, Lage Raho Munnabhai, or 3 Idiots, each time he has managed to passionately uproot an impeding social issue in Indian society and present solutions to us through good-natured comedy and emotion. The result usually leaves one with the desire to at the very least think more about, if not contribute, to the issue at hand. Now don't get me wrong - PK is by no means a bad film. Rest assured all of the aforementioned elements are present here and in great abundance. Yet for some reason, it lacks the punch that the previous 3 films left you with. Why? Read on to find out.

The film begins with an alien (Aamir Khan) being left by his spaceship in a Rajasthan desert. While he is navigating around, his tracking device is stolen by a thief who mistakes it to be an expensive piece of jewelry. Without the device, the alien cannot go home, so he wanders around the neighboring villages searching for the device, picking up subtle cultural nuances along the way. He stumbles upon Bhairon Singh (Sanjay Dutt) who guides him through the desert and leads him to go to Delhi to search for the device. Upon reaching Delhi, he is mistakenly named "PK" and runs into Jagat Janani aka "Jaggu" (Anushka Sharma), a reporter who's on the prowl for an exciting story. Jaggu eventually comes to acknowledge that PK is an alien, and helps him to retrieve his device on a quest that involves great revelations about love, religion, spirituality and life in general.

Now one may ask why my summary didn't address any of the religious themes that the film is being so greatly acclaimed for. The fact is that revealing these themes will subtract from the little novelty the film has to begin with. Unfortunately, PK is quite frankly, Hirani's weakest script to date; however, the reason behind this is not the fault of the screenwriters themselves but the coincidence of "OMG: Oh My God" releasing first. The punch that I had mentioned earlier is reduced to a great extent by the various similarities that PK shares with OMG, especially in the second half. While the manner in which Hirani tackles these issues is without a doubt intriguing, it simply feels like deja vu of the prior film. For instance, the innocence of PK's character being manipulated by the "managers" (as described in the film) of religion hearkens back to Paresh Rawal's character crusading (albeit in a humorous way) against the corrupt self-proclaimed gurus.

Other weaknesses in the film include moments that are too drastic in comparison to the overall mood of the film, taking away from the flow of the story. At one moment, the audience is laughing like there's no tomorrow and the next moment is expected to be overwhelmed with emotion. The transitions lack any sort of smoothness.

In addition, the music is little more than mediocre, with the exception of the catchy "Tharki Chokro", courtesy of guest composers Ajay- Atul. Music has never been a strong point of Hirani's films; Shantanu Moitra's songs for Lage Raho Munnabhai and 3 Idiots were far too minimalist; they seemed better suited for a minute-long ad jingle and lacked the opulence of a classic Bollywood soundtrack. The same goes for PK; the songs have the same structure and arrangements as Hirani's previous films and are almost sleep- inducing. I felt like I was listening to a CD of 3 Idiots on repeat! And the lyrics by Swanand Kirkire and Amitabh Varma are atrocious; words like "Tinga Tinga Nanga Punga" and "Love Is A Waste of Time" are enough proof of the level of lyrics we have here. It's time that Hirani start considering names like A.R Rahman, Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy, and Gulzar in order to improve upon this weakness. The other major weakness is Anushka Sharma; while Hirani's films have never been known for great female roles (the exception being Kareena Kapoor in 3 Idiots), Anushka is unable to make much of the little work she is given and simply repeats her irritating bubbly Punjabi girl act that we have seen her do in virtually every film. It's time she brought some variety to her performances if she wants to be remembered.

Now don't freak out. While the list of grievances may be long, they are no match for the sheer brilliance of the one and only Mr. Perfectionist Aamir Khan. The man has this capability to turn even the worst of scripts into pure gold. Heck, he was even able to shine in "Dhoom 3" - and PK's script is rest assured much, much better than that! Aamir Khan breathes life and soul into the character of PK. From his spot-on expressions and body language to his crisp Bhojpuri dialogue delivery, he is a delight to watch. While this may not be his best performance in comparison to "3 Idiots" or "Taare Zameen Par", it is undoubtedly a performance to be remembered. Sanjay Dutt is delightful as the jovial Bhairon Singh; sadly, his role is far too short, most likely as a result of his jail sentence. Boman Irani as the well-meaning yet timid news anchor also provides great support. The supporting cast, many repeated from 3 Idiots, have also fared quite well. Of course, last but not least, Rajkumar Hirani does succeed as a director despite the many other flaws. His trademark wit and intelligence are present here in great form, and do provide for an enjoyable time.

One thing is certain; PK is by no means a competitor to 3 Idiots. However, considering the other processed trash that has made the 100/200 crore club this year, it is a diamond in the rough. That alone warrants a viewing in the theater.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pardes (1997)
10/10
An Interesting Take on NRI Culture
6 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Back when it released in 1997, Pardes was a box-office blockbuster because of the presence of Shahrukh Khan, the best-selling music by Nadeem-Shravan, and the excellence director Subhash Ghai. Still, for some reason it is not remembered as fondly as DDLJ, Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, or Dil To Pagal Hai - the reason being that it deals with several unpleasant truths about Indian society that the aforementioned films have a tendency to gloss over. It tackles the Indian obsession with Western culture and the elitism of the NRI population in a way that is both entertaining and emotionally moving. There's nothing wrong if the Indian adapts values from Western culture, but to what extent? To the extent of forgetting and deprecating one's own roots? Pardes is a moving tale of the negative effects of emotional and cultural ignorance and isolation and the healing effects of a relationship driven by genuine friendship and goodwill as opposed to greed and lust.

The story begins with Ganga (Mahima Chaudhary), a simple Punjabi village girl who catches the attention of her father's friend Kishorilal (Amrish Puri), who wants her to marry his American-raised son Rajiv. Since Rajiv has no interest in marrying an Indian girl, Kishorilal sets Arjun (Shahrukh Khan) off to finish the task of getting the two together, and he succeeds in making the two fall for each other. Rajiv requests that Ganga come to America for a month to become accustomed to American culture, and this is where the drama begins, as Ganga begins to see that Rajiv is not what he appears to be, and Arjun begins to fall in love with Ganga.

As one can see, the story is a typical 90's romantic melodrama, the kind that became popular following the success of DDLJ. However, do not be put off by the ordinary story. It is the way in which the story is presented that makes Pardes special. Ace director Subhash Ghai has crafted the scenes and situations of the film in a way that is both entertaining in a dramatic sense and emotionally moving.

The first message presented is that of being proud of one's culture. It is not Western culture that is being depicted as "bad" or "immoral"; it is Indian society's and the NRI population's tendency to place it on a pedestal that is being condemned. The scenes with Amrish Puri's materialistic family are meant to highlight the ills of Indian elitism and the family's perception of Western culture as "superior" to embellish their wealthy NRI status. Why should Indians be ashamed of their culture? Why not adapt a value system that takes the best of both worlds? the film asks.

Ghai also manages to tackle the opposite side of the coin as well by depicting the gender hypocrisy of Indian society. While Rajiv is allowed to wander around with various girlfriends even while betrothed, Ganga is humiliated and accused of being characterless simply for her innocent friendship with Arjun. The part of the climax scene in which the grandmother stands up for Ganga is yet another example that provides insight into the humiliation women in Indian society are compelled to undergo as a result of their expected subservience.

The second message is that of the purity and genuineness of human relationships. The problem with the family in Pardes is that they do not value the benefits of family and togetherness, rather seeing love as a superficial entity devoid of genuine emotion. In one of the most touching scenes in the film, an emotionally deprived Ganga cries to Arjun that she "doesn't want a mansion worth millions, she wants the love of a human being, the kind of love that Arjun gives to others". The kindness and gentility of Arjun and the scenes that show his pure relationship with Ganga are another element that take the film higher. His love for Ganga is not driven by lust for outer beauty. It is driven by a genuine willingness to be there for her as a supportive friend and support her in all circumstances. This definition of love as an emotional rather than physical connection is a truly touching message that is necessary in today's world. Where the film stands out apart from similar films of the mid-to- late 90's is that it doesn't shy away from the ugly side of things; there is no utopian family or chocolate romance. Yet it manages to maintain the same clean, pleasant aura devoid of vulgarity or violence (save for the fight scene at the end) that is suitable for family viewing.

In terms of performances, Shahrukh Khan gives one of his best performances along with that in "Swades" and "Chak De India". He is not his usual stereotypical romantic hero, but is instead more mature, restrained and real. He shines in the scenes and gives them greater emotional depth. Mahima Chaudhary is beautiful and endearing as the naive yet headstrong Ganga; she skilfully balances both the vulnerable and strong shades of her character, providing a truly heartwarming performance. Amrish Puri shines as the kind but misguided father figure in a role similar to his in DDLJ, and the supporting cast ranges from decent to pathetic. The technical effects, such as the cinematography and sound, give the film a truly professional look and make it even better. The film is directed at a very brisk pace, and the film does a good job of moving through its 3 hour duration without making you check the time. Nadeem-Shravan's musical score is another highlight of the film, and the songs bear great elegance and musical substance with their deep rhythms and rich melodies.

In short, don't be misguided by people's dismissal of "Pardes". If you are willing to accept and acknowledge the bitter truths depicted, you will be able to see something that is truly special.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Krrish 3 (2013)
7/10
India's first Home-Grown Superhero!
6 November 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Upon watching Krrish 3, one truly feels a bag of mixed emotions. The sheer excitement and anticipation of the third installment of the series that began with "Koi Mil Gaya" almost forces one to accept its greatness, which in some parts it truly does deserve, yet the effect the film leaves upon one is far from the completeness and coherence that the first two films brought forth.

The story continues with Krrish (Hrithik Roshan) doing double-duty, like most of the superhero variety, as a common man on one side, playing typical husband to his wife and son to his father, and a superhero on the other end. Enter antagonist Kaal (Vivek Oberoi) and his sidekick Kaya (Kangana Ranaut), a bunch of Kaal's creations creatively called "maanwars", a plan to destroy the human race, a battle between good and evil, and there you have the story.

Now don't be mistaken - the plot of the film is by no means a copy of any Hollywood superhero film. There is no doubt that Rakesh Roshan has come up with an excellent story that is as good as, if not better than, Koi Mil Gaya and Krrish. There are many other positive qualities of the film. The performances are impressive. Hrithik Roshan excels as both the dynamic Krrish and his middle-aged lovable father Rohit Mehra. Priyanka is good with whatever she gets, Kangana is great, while Vivek Oberoi, the only weak performance here, does get on your nerves at times. Shahrukh Khan, the first choice for the role, would have nailed it and would have been a worthy opponent to Roshan. In addition, the special effects have taken Indian cinema to a whole new realm. They are truly jaw-dropping, and rival those of any Hollywood film. Props to the crew for taking the time to achieve such perfection in this regard.

So what is it that prevents Krrish 3 from achieving true excellence? It is the forced effort to make it appealing to the mass audience that brings it down quite a bit. The execution of the great story is at best mediocre, laced with unintentionally funny and obsolete dialogues. This was a bit of a disappointment for me as the first two, in my opinion, had some wonderfully written and realistic dialogues. In addition, the cinematography of the film is not as pleasing or opulent as that of the first two, which is a true shame considering the sheer magnificence of the graphics. Also, the depiction of a fully clean, utopian version of Mumbai, makes the film look amateurish at times, and it especially takes away from the thril of the climax. Portraying a more realistic version of Mumbai would have been more aesthetically appealing.

The other weak point of the film is Rajesh Roshan's music. There is no doubt that Roshan is a talented music director, but some of the songs sound so outdated that at times they feel like a rehash of his 90s soundtracks such as "Karan Arjun", "Koyla" or "Kaho Naa Pyar Hai". These soundtracks are great considering the time period in which they were made, but for a film on such an advanced technical level as Krrish 3, such music simply does not work.

Now Krrish 3 is not a bad film by any means. The positives truly outweigh the negatives, and I don't regret watching it at all. Yes, the film had much more potential, yes, there were some moments that could have been much better, but considering the newness of the genre to Indian cinema, it truly is a step in the right direction compared to "Ra.One". As long as you watch it in the context for the audience which the film was designed for, you will enjoy it.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed