Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Sanctum (2011)
6/10
Exquisite Scenery Undermined by Weak Script
14 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The idea of exploration is a tantalizing prospect in storytelling because it lends itself to tales of heroism, disaster and tragedy (very strong elements in any human-interest story) while also allowing the storyteller to create a character out of an environment; any place of desolation of isolation can become a source of menace and intrigue that can be stronger than any of the human characters and provide a unique adversary. Films like "The Grey" and "Flight of the Phoenix" are examples of environments that provide such an antagonist that presents many merciless challenges more foreboding than anything a Bond villain could dream up. "Sanctum" attempts to do the same thing with caves, presenting numerous pitfalls and obstacles for the characters to conquer and use their tribulations to grow and change.

Or at least that's what should've happened. Unfortunately, for as much good as the cave setting does to present an ominous--and even occasionally beautiful--setting for the characters, the lushly photographed scenery can't hide a stumbling script and a less than prepared cast.

While the actors aren't exactly good, they acquit themselves well enough to get by. What really hurts "Sanctum" is a screenplay that relies heavily the same human drama to forward the story that has become old-hat since "Night of the Living Dead" and finally devolves into complete, blithering stupidity in its final leg.

The most glaring problem is that the actors are saddled with several emotional scenes that fall flat. For example, Richard's speech to his son, Josh, about his failures as a father might've been an asset to the film's story, but when he breaks out a bunch of clichés about the caves being his "church", the whole scene devolves into a silly, eye-rolling exercise. The same can be said of the final showdown between Richard, Josh and their supposed friend Carl, who runs the gambit of hammy acting scenes from screaming Bill Paxton, sobbing yuppie, groveling heel and, finally, complete loony toon jumping out of the darkness screaming like an Indian warrior to knock people on the heads with a rock. I'd say Iona Gruffudd's performance was a detriment, but, compared to his peers, he at least injects some life into these scenes.

The film does have a number of truly effective moments and knows how to use a little explicit gore to increase the emotional resonance of a scene; a split second clip of Allison Parkinson's scalp being rended from her skull adds tension and sympathy during her climbing scene, for instance. It's also clear that director Allister Grierson knows his photography and utilizes a number of wonderful techniques to capture the beauty of their deadly surroundings.

What is most surprising is the filmmaker's choice to focus on how expansive the environment is when a cave would seem the natural place to tighten the frame and accent the claustrophobic setting. Instead, the caves never become as aggressive as, say, the ship hull in "The Poseidon Adventure" or even the catacombs in "As Above, So Below". The threat of drowning is established early in the movie yet is rarely used again as more than an idle threat to get someone to say, "we'd better keep moving of the plot will never go anywhere."

While "Sanctum" will likely only be remembered--if it is to be remembered at all--as a deleterious flick full of minor thrills and one cheese-ball performance, it has enough fun moments to make this an acceptable, if completely unmemorable, watch.

2.5 out of 4
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Loving Yet Really Bad Homage to Martial Arts Cinema
14 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It's good to know that film companies have not yet given up on the idea of taking a well- known, accomplished filmmaker and coaxing him/her to slap their name on whatever crap they have laying around to make it somehow more marketable. Wes Craven seemed to have some crappy horror movie hitting video store shelves every week with all the horrible flotsam that had his name plastered all over their covers.

In this case, Quentin Tarantino's name is inexplicably tied to this utterly ludicrous vehicle for rapper RZA to show off his lack of acting ability and love of kung fu movies. The story, for what passes as such, features a menagerie of skilled fighters crossing paths in Jungle Village as rival clans kill each other and nefarious alliances are forged and broken in order to procure a large sum of gold. In the middle of this is Blacksmith (RZA), who ends up on a revenge quest when the treacherous lion clan cut off his arms AND murder his woman! If that's not a recipe for martial arts style revenge then I don't know what is!

Sigh. OK, I like bad movies... I love them, actually, and ridiculous Kung fu movies are usually right up my alley; unfortunately, "Man With the Iron Fists" offers little beyond it's superficial love letter to films like "Man With the Golden Arm" and "Fists of Fury". Yes, there's a lot of explicit violence, gore and people waving impractical weapons around, but the story never amounts to anything more than a hodge-podge of set pieces that never fully stitch together into a whole movie.

On the bright side, there is still a LOT of silly nonsense going on here: befuddling Motley Crew hair cuts, hilarious costumes, an embarrassingly juvenile sense "isn't this so awesome?!" when someone pulls out a gun blade or spike-laden body suit add a sense of momentary bemusement to the proceedings. Even more amusing is the baffling acting job by such established talents as Russell Crowe and Lucy Lui. Crowe, in particular, is given numerous scenes to mutter through with so much bad dialog only a man's man like Russ could survive it, let along have a career after he was done.

For example: he looks at a bevy of prostitutes on his bed and says, "Let's pretend to be Catholic and see which one of you is the heretic."

Lui doesn't fare much better in her rallying speech to an army of ninja-whores where she appears to have been replaced by a store mannequin. It's still better than sitting through her performance in "Charlie's Angels", but it's still terrible.

With all this cheese on display, it's a shame I didn't have more fun with this one. There are a few decent fight scenes and a handful of nice directorial flourishes (including some interesting slow motion), but that hardly balances out the manic delirium of the constant editing that renders several scenes completely ineffective.

While there are numerous technical flaws and inconsistent production values, "Man With the Iron Fists" truly fails because the story and characters never develop past being clumps of winks and nostalgic nudges to older--and much more entertaining--films.

1.5 out of 4
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robin Hood (2010)
4/10
Gritty, Dirty Vision of a Legend's Genesis
12 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The prospect of an acclaimed director like Ridley Scott taking on such a revered, popular story like Robin Hood was an intriguing one, and, I'll admit, I was excited to see this movie before it hit theaters. For whatever reason, I never did get around to seeing this one in the years since it fell into Cineplexes with a fart. I don't know why I never got around to it, but I suspect I caught wind of its, um, quality and stayed away.

I do have to commend the filmmakers for choosing something different in telling Robin Hood's origins as an outlaw over the same "rob from the rich, give the poor" song and dance. We've seen that covered in a variety of films ranging from Erroll Flynn, Disney and even Mel Brooks, so a fresh take on the legend is much appreciated. Sadly, for all its good points, the film is a mostly joyless, bloated experience that delivers very little of the fun that Robin Hood is noted for.

There aren't many exciting bits in this movie and the middle portion, which gets caught up in the socio-political struggles of England's royalty are practically soul-draining in its length and turgidity. Russell Crowe plays Robin Hood in his usual grousing manner, and he comes off well when not asked to give monologues or show any emotion that isn't bitter annoyance. One of the biggest problems here is that Crowe's Robin is a cantankerous, joyless man, and the movie follows suit with the character.

Scott does a superb job bringing the medieval setting to life with plenty of dirty battle scenes, squalid villages and dingy castles, giving the story a more realistic tone than one normally associated with the character. The problem is that there's nothing to alleviate the constant drab scenery and oppressively dreary mood. I guess I've always assumed that people would go to a Robin Hood movie to have fun... Scott apparently doesn't think so! He even works in the crusades even though he firmly beat that horse to death in "Kingdom of Heaven". If you study poetry, you learn that you can be both sentimentally sweet or sentimentally bitter and neither is a good thing; sweet and bitter need each other for balance in order to properly reflect that tone of life. "Robin Hood" is practically off the scale in bitterness. There is no fun to be had here; there are only miserable people doing miserable things to each other.

What really stinks is that this thing is over two hours long! Yep, two hours of absolute pessimism and crankiness. When looking at the various iterations the Robin Hood character has gone through in Hollywood, he's been treated fairly well in comparison to many other myth figures; however, this version is a big-budget yawn that starts off with a lot of intriguing ideas and then proceeds to bludgeon the audience over the head with the notion that everything in their world is horrible and there is no hope beyond a grizzled jerk that scowls through his hopeful soliloquy.

So, I hope you can understand why I'm not recommending this well-made, technically proficient film.

1.5 out of 4
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Rite (2011)
5/10
Not a Horror Film, But a Supernatural Drama
10 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Before "The Rite" hit theaters, the marketing campaign had painted the film as yet another in a long deluge of demonic possession thrillers akin to "The Exorcist", which is unfortunate because, in reality, this isn't much of a horror film. There's a much closer kinship to something like "The Exorcism of Emily Rose" than "The Last Exorcism" or its ilk.

The story features a young, troubled man, Michael (Colin O'Donohough), who joins the clergy to escape his father's influence by abandoning his family's profession as morticians. While studying theology, Michael is tapped to join an exorcism course in Rome where he becomes acquainted with a slightly quirky priest (Anthony Hopkins) that performs exorcisms on a regular basis.

What is most damning to the movie is that it's an atypically literate, slow-paced film that seems less interested in thrilling the viewer as making them think about the legitimacy of exorcism and its connection to Christian faith. The movie is assisted by a reasonably strong cast and strong direction from Mikael Hafstrom, who has developed an interesting filmography with his Stephen King adaptation "1408" and his dumb-fun "Escape Plan". The story makes sense and never devolves into cheap scare tactics; the filmmakers obviously respected that audiences aren't totally stupid and could enjoy a film without explosions and green vomit.

Despite being a refreshingly tempered and literate film, "The Rite" fails mostly due to two problems. The first is that, for all its logical discussion about faith and skepticism, the issue is shot down fairly quickly--and concretely--and never treated seriously as the film's dramatic elements begin to escalate. Michael brings up several obvious concerns about treating demonic possession, but is treated as if he has goat feces all over his face. Later, in the face of a possession, Michael looks incredibly stupid by continuing to limply insinuate a young woman is mentally ill despite hearing his friend's voice and vernacular coming from a woman who can't even speak English and needed a translator to speak with him. To put it bluntly, the main character is an idiot.

The second problem is that the film doesn't try to scare the audience nor does it provide anything that is unsettling or even mildly chaffing. Considering the implication that demonic possession is real, the film's supposed attempt at building a tense final third fall flat; Hopkins can't even inject much intensity into the showdown between priest and demon.

Genre fans will be enthused to know that Rutger Hauer has a small role as Michael's father and his performance is by far and away the creepiest thing in the film.

"The Rite" is a well-made film, but it lacks any punch thanks to a lacking storyline and listless performances by the principle cast.

2 out of 4
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Premium Rush (2012)
7/10
Exactly What It Should Be; Intense, Fast, & Full of Action
9 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Wilee (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is a bike messenger that rides Manhattan's hazard-filled streets where serious injury and even fatalities are not uncommon. While in midst of a typically chaotic work day, Wilee finds himself pursued by a dirty cop (Michael Shannon), who wants to procure one of his deliveries.

"Premium Rush" is an atypical Hollywood film that focuses on a marginal premise (bike messengers) and builds an engaging, undemanding narrative around its novelty. The film succeeds because it spends the majority of its time delivering fast-paced, highly stylized chase scenes and short, punchy exposition to flesh out the story.

For the most part, the action sequences, which feature a variety of over-the-top stunts and imaginative direction, carry the movie and make up for the simplicity of the plot. That being said, the cast holds up their end by making the most of each scene. Levitt develops his character through his smirk and slightly snide asides during the action while the rest of the cast is given one or two moments to stand out; however, this is mostly a two person story with Levitt and Shannon eating up the majority of the run-time, and they manage to imbue the movie with a defined personality that fits the New York City culture it's immersed in.

Michael Shannon is definitely a highlight; the guy plays his villainous role with such verve and pomp that he is almost a cartoon character! From his little comments during chase scenes and his embellished back story, you can tell he's not taking himself seriously, and, by extension, neither is the movie. "Premium Rush" shows that it's all in good fun and never aspires to be anything but just that.

David Koepp deserves kudos for bringing such an odd picture to the screen that didn't exactly scream "money-maker" based on its premise, but he gives the audience a fun, visually impressive film. Koepp is no stranger to slightly off-beat fare as he also helmed "Stir of Echoes" and "Secret Window". Neither of those films were blockbusters either, yet they show that Koepp knows how to bring a story to life and adapt to the subject matter.

While it won't win any Oscars, "Premium Rush" never aspires to be such a movie; it's a stylish, glossy popcorn flick That subsists due on a quirky cast that is never asked to over- extend itself.

3 out of 4
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed