Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
if we hold on together.....
30 December 2023
I just revisited this movie for the first time since my childhood. It's difficult to analyze this movie because it is the definition of a children's movie. The plot is very simple and the run time is pretty short. That being said there is a lot of emotion here and the characters learn things about themselves and each other and the world on their journey. The art and animation is great but I was always bothered by how the main child characters look very cutsey and cartooney while their parents look like someone seriously drawing a dinosaur. It is hard to criticize decisions like that because children were the target audience but as a 27 year old man I still felt emotional watching it so kudos to the creators. The theme song "if we hold on together" was the perfect song for this movie because it captures that feeling of something horribly depressing happening to somebody but their friends keeping them hopeful.

R. I. P Judith. Barsi "Ducky" nobody deserves what happened to her and she never got to see the movie released.

R. I. P. Will Ryan "Petrey" I think you played my favorite character of the bunch.....until Spike came along R. I. P. James Horner. This music is amazing and it was the icing on top.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Wacky, random, visual adventure
18 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I have heard a lot of excitement around this movie and was informed it won some Oscars, so a friend and I decided we'd check it out at the theater.

I don't think this movie would have been as impactful on a living room TV and definitely not a monitor or phone screen.

There are some very wild moments in this movie but the plot feels like little effort or thought went into it.

Why is the daughter so evil? She is killing so many people. And it's not like it's an alternative version of her, because she herself said that every version of her in every universe is the same angry, bitter, hateful person. She was even going to let the Jamie Lee Curtis character kill her mother with a big blade near the end. All for what? Because her parents have some difficulty accepting her? Because she butts heads with them every now and then? This is the behavior of a psychopath, so why does she cry and give her mom a hug at the end like she's suddenly a normal daughter?

This movie has some crazy scenes, but it's not worth 2.5 hours, and I wouldn't consider is worthy of any award.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Home Room (2002)
5/10
Eh. Some enjoyable parts. I don't feel like I wasted my time.
16 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
(Just hear me out, OK?) Stories about school shootings have always fascinated me. I DO NOT encourage or support the killers' actions, but it gives us a different look into human psychology. Specifically, the case of Columbine has been the one I slightly obsess over. Dylan and Eric had a complex (but very sick and reprehensible) philosophy. This movie is one of the many, many school shooting themed movies made after the events at Columbine.

After watching the trailer I thought Alicia was simply a tough girl with an "alternative" style, such as Lisbeth from the Millennium trilogy. Instead, she just ended up being a melodramatic young adult. While the build up to the end of the movie where it explains why she is the way she is kept me interested, it simply wasn't satisfying. Alicia and Deanna were not fleshed out enough.

ALICIA went through a traumatizing event, the idea it turned her into a completely opposite person is very overdramatic. She's just way too vicious and unsympathetic. She looked and acted entirely different than her former self, yet she had a caring father and many people tried helping her through her pain. Alicia was an excuse to put a goth kid into the movie. After Columbine, the goth and metalhead scenes were very often considered responsible for school shooter attitudes and mentalities. Music promoting philosophies such as Satanism and nihilism (like Marilyn Manson) were turned into scapegoats. It represented social outcasts in high schools, which Eric and Dylan were. You'll find that a plethora of these post-Columbine movies where a teen is emotionally distressed is also goth. It was basically obligatory. Also, Alicia's lesbianism comes out of completely nowhere. She said earlier that she finds men in their late thirties more sexually attractive than guys around her age.

DEANNA mentions that people only like her because she's rich and trendy. She's got the nice car and hangs out with the preppy "in" kids. At the same time, she's kinda nerdy - she gets good grades and even mentions being in a mathematics contest. It would have been great if being in the hospital room for so long changed her into a different person, like the room acted as some kind of cocoon for personal growth. (That's only a minor complaint though.) Before Deanna can attempt suicide, Alicia convinces her not to and says something along the lines of "You need to tell your parents to get you out of that room." It was already established that she demanded to go back out in the world many times but HAD to stay in that room so her injuries could fully heal and receive counseling for her PTSD.

THE SHOOTER is never really established. He killed 16 kids because that's just what socially outcasted kids do. That's what Alicia declared, but it's never actually explored any further. Dylan and Eric had many anger problems. Eric got even more violent because some antidepressants can cause that in people which was evident in his case. It wasn't just that they were outcasts. In fact, Dylan had a good number of acquaintances. However, he also had anger issues so Eric's social Darwinism philosophy was seen as reasonable to him.

IN THE END it's a rather mediocre/average movie in terms of story structure and character building. Convincing and notable acting. Appropriate setting. Some clever bits here and there. The scenes feel in order and flow into the following ones. Keeps the audience interested.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jaws 3-D (1983)
3/10
Interesting plot, poor execution
11 September 2016
I actually find this plot to be very unique. Neither of the other two JAWS sequels are so distinguishable. They take place in open water and the shark destroys some boats. This one is in a whole different environment... Sea World. People are saying this plot is ridiculous except it's really not because having a live great white shark in captivity is every aquarium's dream. Sure the shark bashes through steel mechanized gates but is that really such a far leap from pulling apart an entire pier or pulling down those yellow barrels like the shark did in the first movie? Unfortunately everything positive I could say about this movie stops there.

While the look of the mechanical shark improves with each sequel this one did a terrible job at showing it properly. Also there's a scene where the baby great white is attacking a sunken ship to try getting to some people but it's clearly a guy ramming a toy shark into a miniature ship prop. The baby also hardly ever moves its tail for some reason so it looks like its just drifting in the water. The effects have their moments but they're mostly cheesy and laughable.

The acting is uninspired and none of the characters are really memorable. There were times where I was like "oh yeah... THAT guy exists..."

Every time I saw the shark fin rise to the surface and heard that iconic music playing it felt like the director was just saying "Oh! I get to make a JAWS movie! That means we need lots of these shots!" There was no tension to those shots like there was in JAWS and even a little in JAWS 2.

It's bad but I've seen worse. The only reason I gave it a 4/10 instead of a 2/10 is because I didn't take the film very seriously so I got some good laughs out of it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
V/H/S (2012)
5/10
Watch the first VHS short then turn off your TV
2 September 2016
The first VHS short (the one with the buggy-eyed girl) is the only redeeming quality of this movie. Watch that one then turn it off. In fact it was so much better than the rest that I'm rating this movie solely thinking of it because all the others were dumb and forgettable. SO 8/10 for that short but -3 because it's stuck in a crap movie.

The only people who could find value in the other two thirds are those who want mindless gore, despite it being pretty bad quality (at one point in the 3rd VHS the blood looks like raspberry jam instead of actual blood which only made me hungry instead of scared). I kind of expected that after I saw a company named Bloody Disgusting helped make this film. But I know there's an audience for that kinda stuff so for you guys give the whole movie a shot. If you find enjoyment in it that's great.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed