Firstly, this series has very big shoes to fill. Which makes the task a daunting and very challenging one. However. "Narcos: Mexico" uses the same modus operandi but unfortunately fails in all aspects to reach the same level of brilliance as the original series "Narcos". Sad to, but everything is of significantly lower quality, not least the acting. No character has the intensity and nerve seen in all of the 3 seasons of "Narcos". Unfortunately, Diego Luna is not even close to convincing as protagonist. Waiting for him to actually start acting, to see the development of the character of growing into and becoming a cartel leader, turns out to be futile. For a stark contrast, the scene in episode 5 with Wagner Moura returning as Pablo Escobar (and several other characters/actors from the original "Narcos") and Diego Luna is very revealing. In short: the "Narcos"-crew in general and Moura in particular inexorably and hands off just steals the show... The contrast is quite embarrassing. The juxtaposition of "Narcos: Mexico" with its predecessor brings clarity; making top notch programming is no joke. Points for effort deserved- but this killed the magic of the series. At least for now. Also...
... the overwhelmingly positive reviews are obviously mostly fake. To all of you who sell your morality and write fake reviews for money - Go to hell, all of you. Without ethics and morality, humans are nothing but apes. What world do you wish to leave behind?
... the overwhelmingly positive reviews are obviously mostly fake. To all of you who sell your morality and write fake reviews for money - Go to hell, all of you. Without ethics and morality, humans are nothing but apes. What world do you wish to leave behind?
Tell Your Friends