Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Welcome to Tuscany, anno 1976
1 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
In this light-hearted - and very bare-breasted - comedy playing out in Montecatini Terme, Florence, Italy, medical doctor Elia Bonvicini (Dagmar Lassander) takes on the role as town medic in the little Tuscan town, after the demise of the old town doctor.

Ms. Bonvinci is an uninhibited and modern-minded woman. She is temporarily away and lives at the home of the town's mayor Gedeone (Maurizio Arena), a Christian Democrat politician and an industrial manufacturer of apparel.

She very soon finds herself the centre of attention, not only from the mayor but also from his son Roberto (Gianluigi Chirizzi). Thus, Bonvinci has to bear the cross, so to speak, of the little inhibited and conservative towns frustrations, usually - but not always - in a typically movie-like fashion as the focal point of the collective illness of the town's males: sexual frustration.

Rosalba (Stella Carnacina), Gideon's second daughter, is hindered by her father in her relationship with a courier driver due to his political affiliation with the Italian Communist Party, being a son of a left-wing extremist terrorist.

Elijah takes an interest in Rosalba's condition and, together with parish priest Don Firmino (Ghigo Masino), tries to convince the mayor to accept his daughter's relationship.

We are presented with snippets of Italian realities affecting the minds and lives of the people of the time: The politics of the Catholic Church, the fear of the Communist Red Brigade bombings, kidnapping and killings, the dubious morale of officials and politicians, including the first billed rather unsympathetic moralist and adulterer, the mayor Gideone himself.

These snippets of commentary on social realities do, however, fragment the story. Much more so than the various women frequently opening their blouses to display their breasts, which happens very often in the first half of the movie. Yes: women only; the men don't expose even their torsos. But this was in 1976, after all.

On the other hand, this whole oeuvre is very inspired by Italian Commedia dell'arte, however probably never improvised: For example, there is the local rascal gang of boys committing various pranks on people, commenting the story by singing rude songs accompanying their pranks, making the film verge on the brink of a musical, without solo numbers, Greek and Italian style.

The jokes themselves vary in quality from low-brow toilet humour to quite intelligent satire of greater finesse.

Another reviewer on this site ridicules the Tuscan accent used by many characters, which they feel may be the only funny thing in this movie to laugh at, at least for Italians.

There is nothing ridiculous about the Tuscan accent: instead, this movie gives a rare opportunity to watch a comedy where this accent has been "allowed" in a film, by an Italian film studio. It also adds to the humour of the movie, since the writer/director has taken the accent and locally unique modes of expression into account when writing funny dialogue - understandably lost in the translation to other languages.

On a more intellectual meta-level, there is a cultural element to having made this mostly superficial comedy that is quite interesting. A well-known quote states:

"The Tuscan is the most alien to holding speeches, the most alien, that is, to putting himself in a comedy, believed only half-heartedly and conducted for amusement or to help himself live. He never gives you, as in other parts of Italy, the fairy tale, the myth, the rhetoric of himself; on the contrary, he tends to do the opposite, to dismantle all rhetoric around himself, with words, and even more: with silence."

Welcome to Tuscany, anno 1976.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wonderful Girl Power
1 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
How wonderful to see a movie about a little girl fulfilling her inmost dream and quest for what is dearest to her heart!

This is not the violent Girl Power of Mindy "Hit-Girl" Macready, this real Girl Power in the shape of Rose Sandford portrayed by Farrah Mackenzie.

It seems obvious to me, that script writers Rumaan Alam and Sam Esmail really understand little girls, and that girls are the ones who carry the keys to answering humanity's existential questions.

Besides this personal quest of Rose's, which turns out to be the main objective of the film, the film is well acted, generally speaking. It tries - and sometimes succeeds - in being exciting, but it struggles to create real stakes for the characters. Despite the suspense with the side plots, it ultimately leaves a lot of viewers unsatisfied: like with the TV series "Lost", there seem to be a lot of exciting things happening, albeit things that the viewer never gets to see or know closely.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
False alarm
31 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This "shocking" drama was indeed controversial for its times, but the claims of it dealing with the - extremely controversial - topic of necrophilia, is a false alarm.

The discussion pertains to the character Phil, who takes sexual advantage of a woman he believes has passed out from alcohol, but has in fact fallen to her death.

When Phil realizes that the woman is dead, he is disgusted by himself and the whole situation; so much so that he commits suicide.

This is the opposite of necrophilia, since a necrophile is sexually aroused by the thought of "fornicating" with a corpse, and in some cases seek out corpses to perform their acts.

So the claim, made in multiple instances, is a false one. There is no necrophilia in this film, thank goodness.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arcana (1972)
6/10
Less complicated, less confused than some viewers think
18 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
So far most user reviews of Arcana express bewilderment as to the meaning of its narrative, but it's not very complicated:

Spoilers:

This is a story of clashes between cultures, more than anything else.

Mrs. Tarantino has escaped the poverty of Southern Italy (Sicily) together with her husband and their only son, and moved to the rich industrial city of Milan, situated in the rich Northern parts of Italy.

Mrs. Tarantino - whose surname we know, her husband's surname being printed on a name tag on the apartment door - has escaped the poverty of Southern Italy (Sicily) together with her husband and their only son, and moved to the rich industrial city of Milan, situated in the rich Northern parts of Italy.

They carry with them to the Milanese, their foreign culture which to a large part is not well understood by Italian Northerners. The Tarantinos' culture is more inspired by Turkish and gypsy culture (as heard in the quite aggressive gypsy violin theme, which is a major ingredient of the music track, also carried in the images of a a wandering Sicilian violinist, playing as he walks on a road to - who knows?) . We are shown "incomprehensible" images and topics brought from the South, of strange dances, snakes, a woman regurgitating frogs and a donkey in a hoist being elevated outside a house; events that would be familiar to us if we knew more about Sicilian culture.

The Sicilian rural culture is shown to carry elements of incest, superstition, and trickery as a way of life in a heavily competitive environment. The views on theft, rape, body and bodily fluids differ from the more polished suit bearers of the North.

To support his family the husband did maintenance work on the subway, where he replaced rail tracks and laid new ones as the subway network expands. The subway workplace is a metaphor for the Sicilians' social status, they are literally run into the ground to do the "dirty work" for corporate Milan.

One day Mr. Tarantino lost his legs as a train ran him over. His workmates carried him outside into the sunlight, but he soon died as a result of the accident.

Now left to a meager widow's pension not matching Mrs. Tarantino's social and economic ambitions, she scams the Milanese of their money by pretending to be a psychic, because she wants more beautiful furniture, and a new, modern and more beautiful home.

We don't get to know Mrs. Tarantino's Christian name and hence she is less of an individual, more representing a people, a different one; foreigners that we don't know.

Mrs. Tarantino despises her stupid, desperate clients, and uses psychology intuitively to manipulate them and gives them just enough of "right" answers. This is to lure them into becoming psychologically dependent on her "consultation services", and to come more often, giving up even more of their "Northern" money.

To the viewer, the son (also nameless) is presented as a true psychic and natural born magician, who draws from their common arcane and "foreign" culture of the South to influence the mothers' clients.

Aggressively, the son throws his mother's mock talismans composed of salt and sawdust away, and creates his own, very functional and dangerous ones, by picking soil materials from the subway dirt where his father was killed by the onrushing capitalist-industrialist train.

He will use photographs and objects to "get under the clients' skin", and dip into their souls, creating havoc, by first cutting out their eyes from a photo of man to go blind; he will stab the abdomen of a woman in another photo causing her to give birth to an expected child deaf, dumb and blind, while also raping a customer because he desires her body.

The violated young woman's name we do get to know, therefore she is one of "us". Yet she comes back for more "guidance" as her psyche deteriorates.

The son will also put his mother's stockings over his head like that of a robber wanting to not be recognized, to get access to the mother's vagina by tying, raping her to satisfy his youthful and lonely penis often erect, and by doing so extracting more of her accumulated knowledge of Sicilian "magic knowledge" out of her, to get back at the people who destroyed his family.

The more the Sicilian culture is put as "spells" and "talismans" on the Milanese who come for "spiritual guidance", the worse the Milaneses' lives become, until they go totally mad and psychotic.

(Northern) Media outlets of the times when this film was made, not uncommonly reported on the "underachievement" of the industrial production performance in the South, and stories about Southerner workers not producing even one months' worth of a yearly production volume - compared to that of workers Northern cities like Milan - have been persistent and commonplace. The Italian Northerners have historically often frowned upon the Italian Southerners for their "laziness" and general "third world behaviour". In the film, Sicilian fake "pensioners" queue to get their benefits, feigning disabilities or committing other types of fraud, as police comes identifying the fraudsters and brutally arrest them and carry them away. So yes, there is a racist element to the situation in this film, although it in fact is open to personal interpretation as to the director Giulio Questi's personal stance.

The easiest view to take - and the most difficult for a director to convey - is that Questi sees the conflict from a position of understanding, more than blaming the Milanese or the Sicilians for their incompatibility and for the conflict.

But if we are biased we may, for instance, see a Marxist critique of the capital forces of a Fascist state (where capital and government have merged), which inhumane power we can clearly see towards the end when soldiers start shooting at civilians, and thus display another facet of Fascism: the carrying out of the capitalist state's dictates and policies by use of its monopolistic violence.

The alternative interpretation is also possible, albeit more difficult to adopt: That the socio-economic pressure on the North by the South must be handled in any which way, or else the people will all "go mad", or the society which they constitute will become even more dysfunctional.

The film opens with a statement from Questi: "To the viewers, This film is not a story. It's a card game. This is why the beginning is not credible nor is the ending. You are the players. Play well and win."

The card game refers to the Tarot game used extensively by Mrs. Tarantino, more than a poker game card deck. Thus we, in front of the movie screen - and also the corporate Fascist state - play with more than markers or money, we play with life and death, happiness and sorrows.

A guess is that a solution to Questi's film, and the card game he presents as a puzzle, would have been a separatist one between autonomous regions living in peace or competitively - sometimes at war with each other, as in history - rather than having a united Italy where the the populations of the North and the South are held as hostage by a Fascist super government forcing all peoples' cultures to either clash or go extinct in the name of a centralized power. But in regard to the interpretative options of the film, there are probably several other ways to solve Questi's puzzle.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Misunderstood by disappointed critics
30 June 2023
Several of the - probably amateur - reviewers who give this move a very low score are on to something, but none of the reviewers published seem to get the point. You're not thinking straight.

To understand the fiendishness of this movie, you need to think "political motivation", "format", "check boxes" and "socially subversive propaganda".

You need to look to the foundations of the programme behind this movie to get its message.

As for several reviewers giving The Kid Detective a high score, they probably have identified the good craftsmanship put into it, and such factors are indeed important for a film, as well as probably simply liking the movie.

However, a film does not live apart from its society of audiences and of the world in which it's produced. When a technically good film is used to harm a society which its creators hate, a good film is also bad.

Amazon does not allow reviewers to compare a movie or its content with real world events, or opinions of those. For this reason I refrain from being more specific, but try to see the politics behind this, an many other contemporary, post-realism movies.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The L Word: Generation Q (2019–2023)
2/10
From positives to negatives
16 March 2023
The original L-Word series probably is my all time favourite television series. It was pro-woman, pro-lesbian, pro-diversity, pro-empowerment, pro-love.

The Generation Q reboot is a totally different breed: it is an anti-White, anti-male, anti-heterosexual propaganda hit piece.

The raison d'être for this modernised take on sexual politics was perhaps partly made from revved-up pro-progressive politics and from frustration with a president in office, detrimental to ordinary citizens and to the United States of America as a whole.

Unfortunately, this reboot turns the whole idea of the original L-Word on its head. I will not say something stupid as "this reboot should not have been made". It has many fans, and a lot of people love it for its widened scope.

But where has the love gone, and why was it compromised by hate?
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
For those who love all ages of life
18 January 2022
A review here on IMDB complains that an industrialist has made this film (what normal movie is not made by industrialists?), that the young people in it are super-clean and don't know what unemployment, money shortages or drugs are. As if a movie is bad for those reasons.

Why do reviewers so often want movies to wallow in misery? This movie is the opposite: a happy, funny and enjoyable story with lovely characters only. Can't movies be bright and good? Also, this is a drama comedy, not a teenage angst tragedy.

It's a real story with personality and with a lovely atmosphere. If I had been young and seen it, I would have loved it. I do now, even though I'm old.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed