Reviews

16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3 Body Problem (2024– )
6/10
Superficial popcorn SF
23 March 2024
After watching all episodes of the first season all hope that some have voiced after being disappointed with the first one or two episodes are misplaced: the sequences with the young Ye Wenjie are actually one of the best parts of the series: the dark atmosphere and the intensity of the acting of Zine Tseng were a perfect fit. The contemporary crime story around the string of suicides of high profile scientists was a good continuation, not the least because it was carried by two good actors, Liam Cunningham and Benedict Wong. Wong got some more depth and complexity, because he is shown in his interactions with his son, but at the same time these parts don't seem to contribute anything to the main story. Cunningham has to play an important, but very one-dimensional character. But the whole subplot is soon finished and for the viewer the small amount of suspense contained here, is killed by showing us the solution early on. The characters are later reused in a very unconvincing and silly way, basically it seems England has only one leader figure and one police man.

The contemporary story line around the group of young geniuses in England which takes up most of the screen time dropped the ball on many levels. The actors are quite uneven in their performance, but even more striking is that some of them are a good fit for their role, while others are painfully unconvincing casting decisions. Eiza González as Auggie Salazar is supposed to be a technical genius, a nerd, but she completely fails to project any cool intelligence. So in those scenes where she has to show emotions or where she is just part of a group of (totally not nerdy) friends, she is convincing, but really fails in making us believe she is an academic and scientists (her impressive beauty is probably more of an obstacle than a plus in this context). Jess Hong as Jin Cheng is much better in doing exactly that. She handles the different aspects of her character and the development of the character very well. Again, the writers are quite clumsy: Though we follow Cheng all the time with her friends, where she is a very normal, emotional and non-academic person, they add a scene with her fiance Raj and his family, where she is suddenly nerdy and socially awkward.

Her love story with Alex Sharp as Will Downing is well done from both sides, and Sharp plays the melancholy, self-depracating dying man quite well too. Jovan Adepo as Saul Durand is rather pale and unmemorable. This is not helped by the fact that he is supposed to be especially intelligent, but is quite often rather slow in the uptake.

The writing is painfully mediocre. The story centers on some great ideas, but the writers didn't trust the audience to find them interesting enough to tag along, so they filled the screen time up with uninteresting love stories and a lot of moral discussions which don't lead to anything but some self-righteous noise. They don't care about the main plot points at all, probably because they were a given: Why is the distortion of research in physics such a problem? What are the results of the public knowledge of the existence of aliens and of their coming?

As we all know, the series is based on one of the best Science Fiction publications of the 21st Century. The novels tell a very wide-ranging story in a scientifically sound manner and always amaze the reader by taking a very broad view. Scientific considerations play just as much a role as sociological ones. All of this is mind-expanding in the best sense of the word. So much intellectuality is of course unacceptable for a television series. But the fact that the authors of the series then cut out so much that the most important plot points are almost incomprehensible, but instead a sweet mash of romance and morality is stirred in, is unnecessary and cannot be excused by the requirements of a television series.

All in all this series tells a story, mainly about a group of very beautiful young people and how complicated their love life is. There are also some aliens in it and some incomprehensible stuff about physics, but it is not a lot, so don't worry.
379 out of 537 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Damsel (2024)
5/10
good first half, then crashing hard
11 March 2024
In the first half this movie is entertaining and fun. Brown can, in her best moments, project the intense experience of pain, of an hurt body so convincingly that it reminds me a bit of Bruce Willis in Die Hard 1. So the build up is ok, the first parts in the caves are really good, but then suddenly she turns into a mixture of McGyver and, let's say, Charlize Theron in 'The old guard'. Plain silly and not hiding it.

As often nowadays, all male characters are either corrupt or - no matter - here they are all corrupt (even if they regret it later).

Well, at least the dragon was good (yes, there is a dragon, but that is general knowledge since the trailer dropped): slimmer and meaner than most.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Criminal Code (2023– )
8/10
One of the better Netflix series in recent years
26 November 2023
Entertaining action, solid acting, an interesting plot, which evolved until the last episode, likeable characters and good writing makes this a good choice. The writers use a lot of typical plot devices like the untameable cop, the new buddy, the revenge plot, the unlikeable new boss etc, but it is interesting how they break them and make them believable and human. While other productions seem to go either in the direction of tougher and tougher or all start out with heaps of problems and it goes down from there, here they choose a convincing middle ground.

I don't speak Portuguese, but watched it with the original voices + subtitles anyway. Highly recommended.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
FUBAR (2023– )
9/10
Great documentary on recent efforts to modernize the CIA
17 November 2023
The situation of the US foreign intelligence service is critical: the staff is over-aged overall. The young people in the new generation have no sense of the sacrifices involved in serving their country and, as they are not used to working in hierarchies, need considerably longer training periods. Modern communication habits and the abolition of the separation of private and professional life often described by sociologists lead to unprofessional behavior that would have been unthinkable in the past. This documentary series outlines these pressing problems in vivid images and does not shy away from speaking the truth in clear terms where necessary. All in all, an outstanding series, but I have to deduct a point because of the unclear depiction of the lung operation with urine (episode 7).
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alchemy of Souls (2022– )
7/10
great first, mediocre second part
10 April 2023
I am an European, but a fan of Korean tv shows. The first part with its 20 episodes belongs to the best I have seen yet: A great fantasy setting with a convincing world, a great story which is told in a very interesting way uncovering layer for layer, a very new take on a love story which is at the same time the story between master and study. So if you have seen episode 1-19 it is almost 10/10 (for me the music is often too syrupy and the comic relief sequences are sometimes a bit too clumsy to really reach the top).

But in episode 20 they introduce new and vital information how the story world works and immediately make a very crude use of it. This is so embarrassing because up to this point all major plot elements have been carefully prepared in advance, often many episodes before they make use of them. It seems as if either someone else wrote this episode or they decided in the last minute to introduce these new plot hooks for the second part.

Well, the second part is a mess in more than one aspect. First of all of they replaced the actor for the female lead (Jung So-Min). For twenty episodes you watched her in many scenes and many close-ups - and Jung So-Min is an very talented actress bringing the many aspects, the character is supposed to have, convincingly to life: She is sullen and dismissive, scornful, condescending, reluctantly affectionate, insolently submissive, tenderly concerned, full of love and desperate. And she can switch between all of them in a second and make you believe in the reality of the character. The new actress is not bad, but by far not as good as Jung So-Min. The chemistry between Jung So-Min and Jae-Wook Lee, who is also very good, makes the first part to something special. And somehow these feeling cannot be shifted to a new face.

Add to this that the second part lacks the subtlety in plot building of the first and the ending has all the silly bluntness of the final scenes of Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery.

It would be great to know why they botched this series which could have been a masterpiece so badly. And who are they?
22 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beyond Evil (2021)
6/10
Strange mix
27 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The series is a strange mix of impressive and silly. Impressive actors, great settings, but the main story is really silly and relies twice on the same improbable trope which comes straight from the cheap pulp fiction stories of the early 20th Century: An evil character pretends (in one case all his life, in the other for years) to be handicapped, so that people are misled.

If you ignore the relation of the two main characters in the first few episodes with its silly dialogues, you may enjoy many good, some even great scenes. With few exceptions the music isn't too sentimental (for my European taste) and conveys - as does the camera work and editing - the dark and closely interwoven emotional net in which all main characters are entangled.

But even if this basic feeling that the film conveys feels very realistic: at the end of the day, it's just a pretty trivial pulp fiction fantasy, but in some parts very well done and there enjoyable.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Watch (2020–2021)
4/10
Not funny enough
14 March 2022
It is quite a challenge to transpose comedy from one medium to another. And here it didn't work at all. More cringe than fun.

If you are coming from Pratchett's books you will be especially disappointed: discworld is a defamiliarized view of our society (and many institutions), where what we think we know is so changed that we can rediscover and newly and deeper understand it. Add to this the ability to detect big and small naked emperors counterbalanced by a warm humanity. The tv series is mostly just silly. And it doesn't trust Pratchett's vision at all: He discussed gender inequality, racism and diversity using the medium of traditional fantasy - trusting that the readers would understand. They tried to keep this around but spent most of their energy adding on top all the modern concepts directly doubling the message to an ALL CAPS writing style - very obviously not trusting us to get their points.

"Das Gegenteil von gut ist gut gemeint." (The opposite of good is well-intentioned)
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
trying too hard, yet mildy boring
24 January 2022
This movie tries too hard to be badass. The characters are, as the story, quite silly. The actors may be good, but the script doesn't give them a lot to do: they just look brooding and grim all the time. The script centers on five murders and the disfigured victims are shown in detail for minutes. But as with everything here, too, the film achieves exactly the opposite of what it obviously wants to accomplish: you are mildly bored.

The only group of people who will enjoy this film are enthusiastic proponents of 'death sentence for everything' with a fondness of viewing tortured flesh.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
No Offence (I) (2015–2018)
7/10
underrated police show
18 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
After watching more than 2 seasons: In the long run, this is not a comedy, but it has many comic elements making some of the dark aspects more bearable. The three main characters - a constable, a sergeant and an inspector - are all female. Their boss is female and some of the other supporting characters are also female. If you can live with this unrealistic setup, you can enjoy a quick paced, often very witty show, usually telling one larger story during the whole season and a shorter story during one episode. The actors are impressing, even if they, especially the inspector, have sometimes to fight against a script which is at times more interested to show off how unconventional its characters are. The stories are an uneven mix: some of the episode plots and smaller elements are very well done, while the the season plots and some of the episode plots are crime story clichés up to the point where important plot twists are repeated (male characters betray female characters with which they have a relationship).

The dialogues are the fuel of this show and, especially in the first season, extraordinary and make it worthwhile to watch the show. Comic highlights are brash Tegan and manic Miller.

So the fresh take on female main characters and the in parts brilliantly comic dialogue is marred by some stereotypical forms of the unconventional and a misandric undercurrent.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Signs (2018– )
6/10
insecure mix of crime story and historical fantasy
8 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The main plots in both seasons are crime stories. This could have been good, because the actors are solid and camera and editing are fine too. But the writers obviously felt the need to cram more into it, so there are lots of small parallel stories going on but not going anywhere. Then there is a strange obsession with Nazis; in the first season it is slightly more historically inclined about murdered workers, but mainly a reason to show some Nazi paraphernalia, in the second season it becomes full out ghoulish building on the legend of the Reichskreisel. And the writers felt the need to make the fantastic elements which were only hinted at in the first season (basically the whole time there is a full moon) explicit with people disappearing for 2 weeks but believing it was only a day etc. This doesn't add anything to the main story. It is like someone was afraid we would be bored with a story in a small provincial town in Poland.

It is not often that one can so clearly identify the culprit, why a series which aimed high has become a disaster, but in this case it is clear: the writers have no idea what they are doing. They start a lot of small character developments and then they drop them again and redesign the character to have more action. A pity, really, this could have been good.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Nevers (2021–2023)
6/10
Glossy kitsch
21 April 2021
It tries so much to satisfy contemporary young adult sensibilities ranging from super hero plot construction to identity politics without trusting any of it to carry the story. The result is an overstuffed show ready to burst like an overcooked sausage.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mind Game (2015)
5/10
crime love story
15 April 2021
Beautiful actors wrapped up in silly crime stories which get worse over time ending in 10 episodes of convoluted revenge. There is a lot of eternal love around, just never getting the right people together and this keeps the show rolling. The writers have learned a bit of the novelists and a lot from the operas of the 19th Century (eternal love, switched children, revenge to the last drop pf blood, dying beauty etc.)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Demon's Path (2018)
2/10
Trashy
28 February 2021
There is probably no aspect of this series which is any good: The plot is ridiculous, the dialogue laughable, the acting boringly stereotyped etc. The makers of this low-budget production tried to compensate for this all time low by a lot of very gory scenes which usually don't make any sense but are very explicit. So if this gets you going, the series is for you, the rest should avoid it. I could imagine to watch this in forty years with friends on a campy theme night 'the worst series of all times' and have a really good laugh.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Actors stand no chance against abysmal script
16 January 2021
The movie is quite a disaster zone and only bearable if you switch the language track to Korean (unless you speak Korean obviously). The plot is basically a collection of holes kept together by a thin thread wrapped around the idea of 'the greater good' patched with some unrelated action scenes. The actors do in general a good job given the limitations of the script, which is going out of its way to mess up its characters and any kind of believability. As many action movies Outside the Wire picks up interesting topics: the psychological and moral implications of drone strikes, the many conflicting political and moral aspects of US interventions all over the world, and the ethics of AI warfare. And it uses the almost foolproof formula of a redemption story. But it doesn't succeed in weaving anything like a convincing plot out of these elements. At the end, everything becomes terribly cringy, almost as if they coerced the director to make this ending and he wanted to signal by its cringiness that we shouldn't buy it - even in an action movie.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dracula (2020)
5/10
too clever for itself
4 January 2020
The first half of the first episode is not bad and some scenes of the rest achieve a similar level of ok-ness or are even good entertainment. The actors of the three main characters are quite convincing, and especially Sister Agatha is partially very well-written. But it becomes clear early on, that the writer is very much in love with his own cleverness. 'Here, you didn't see this coming, did you?' - Yes, very true, because it doesn't make any sense based on the information, we got up to this point about the world and the characters. 'Ah, my creativity can be burdened by stuff like that' If you can live with that, the show is for you, lots of surprising stuff inside, I promise. If you cannot stop thinking while watching a show, you may find yourself more and more offended by the vain smugness one feels at the heart of this show.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tunnel (2017)
7/10
enjoyable crime melodrama
27 December 2019
The show tells a slightly convoluted story about a series of killings in the 1980ies and 2017. A cop, who is thrown 30 years into the future, becomes part of a team working on solving these crimes. For a western viewer this is an interesting mix between well-known elements (cop show, enemies become best buddies etc.) and unusual elements: the time traveling just happens and is never explained; and even more so on the emotional side: while we do know the serious crime fighter show (think CSI, Criminal Mind) or the the comic variant (Castle), this is mostly sentimental. with a bit of comic relief and some action The show highlights the soppy elements of the plot, getting its emotional power mostly from all the family relations depicted (and not the love story). Even if plot and dialogue are sometimes a bit too formulaic and because of its sentimental bend the way it tells its story is sometimes a bit too slow, it is all in all quite an entertaining show
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed