1/10
The Phantom has left the building...in 1925
29 June 2004
To start with, this Phantom reinvents the story line with things that Gaston Laroux never had in his book. Like characters that were never in the book, and to add insult to injury, the reviews of the Kopit/Yestin musical claim it is closer to the book than the more famous Andrew Lloyd Webber version. It actually stuck close to the Lon Chaney classic. Even Phantom star Michael Crawford said many times that he based his characterization on the magnificent work of "The Man Of A Thousand Faces."

While utilizing actual sets of the Paris Opera House, it's sumptuous production values mask an almost ludicrous storyline that make Erik the Phantom a plagued wimp.

What infuriated me most about this entry in the Phantom film history was that after religiously taping the two parts and eliminating all commercials, the director/writer doesn't even show you the Phantom's face. Instead, we are "treated" with looks of horrified disgust by those who supposedly did see his ugly visage. What a gyp.

Actors Burt Lancaster and Charles Dance have been better used elsewhere, and both of them should hang their heads in shame for being connected to this complete overhaul of the great original. To date, the only true Phantom Love The Opera is the 1925 silent classic starring Lon Chaney Sr.

To make matters all the worse, this Yestin and Kopit version was made into an even less memorable musical with totally forgettable songs.
1 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed