1/10
Cheap, cheesy, boring action movie, worse than the usual action movies!
24 April 2000
I could not believe that they made five Operation Delta Force movies in two years. I don't know how much money they had to make this one, but it is pretty cheap. There are things that blow up, gun shots...but no plot. They had no money for the final sequence where a submarine was crashing near The Liberty Statue(is that the way to say it in english) in New York, so they took the background and added an explosion in front of it...the result is so crappy that I compared it to the helicopter crash in the awful DNA and said the difference wasn't big. Some terrorits get six or seven bullets, and there's no blood. Without forgetting the awful acting. The action sequences have no goal and are there to fill the blanks in the scenario...what scenario, again??!! It is just bad as the other Operation Delta Force films. Unexplainable terrorist presence, gun shots, no blood, some explosions, no budget, no scenario, no acting (the grass and the guns did a better job than the actors) make this film. I don't know who's the director, but I'm sure he's not gonna have a long and nice career. Maybe he should think about putting some ''known'' action films actors that are in trouble now, like Steven Seagal (who played in The Patriot), Jean-Claude Van Damme (who played in Desert Heat), or Jeff Wincott, who was supposedly a martial arts superstar, and who played in Future Fear...oops, I think he played in the first Operation Delta Force, or is it Jeff Fahey, anyway, they are both bad actors, so I don't care, and no one should. I ask you not to waste your money on renting this one OR WORSE, BUYING IT! Even action fans won't like it. Except if you like the Nikita TV series...it is approximately the same thing. A cheap and boring thing (I'm not talking about the Nikita movie by Luc Besson!!!!) I give it 30%.
6 out of 58 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed