2/10
Great art, terrible entertainment
23 January 2007
This movie tell it's story in its own amazing style, so I agree that it may be classified as "art". Cinematografy is very sharp indeed. If you however watch movies for entertainment, and not to analyze the artistic element, then this movie is nothing but utter crap. As a 5 minute short movie its very characteristic style and story would do very well indeed. But dwelling on the same point for 91 minutes is simply stretching it way to far. You get the idea after a few minutes, then you have to suffer for the rest of the movie enduring the absolute nothingness of it all. If you are hoping for some sort of punchline in the end you will be very disappointed also. Totally boring from start to end. I give this movie a score of 2 rather then 1 because of very tidy camera-work etc. Granted, there are content stimulating your intellect, but not enough to justify this 91 minute fever nightmare with its near stop speed. If you're a common movie watcher and do not care about poetry, fine art or similar, then this movie is definitely not for you. If you however enjoy movies like Mulholland Drive and similar, you will possibly like this one to, even if it is not half as complex.
20 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed