The propaganda content is routine for WWII. It is anti-Fascist, but with no new or exciting aspects. For example, the Fascist lackey "Kerndon" meets a routine, unspectacular end right on cue after he learns that Spencer Tracy's character is about to uncover something. In fact, there is a routine-ness to everything here. The strong patriotic message was clearly intended to dominate this film. This is a case of a meticulous director delivering a dominant message, and these factors steamroll over everything else.
Katherine Hepburn of course is above-average in her performance, but is overly subdued. Her character has some depth, but as an actress it appears that the director or someone has tamed her natural vibrant acting style. Please don't misinterpret this comment- she is fascinating as always and well cast in the role. I believe that her performance was subordinated to the dominance of the message.
Spencer Tracy gives a strong, believable performance. His character, however, is quite one-dimensional and relentless. Thats OK since he is supposed to be a super-patriot which is understandable in a time of war. It might have been seen as inappropriate for Tracy to have added much nuance here.
Very fine black-and-white cinematography and first-rate production values. Good supporting performances. Despite these virtues, the film overall is somewhat plodding. It does have mystery, but lacks much that is spontaneous or original.
For an exciting WWII espionage film with a similar plot and propaganda message, you can view the highly acclaimed "Foreign Correspondent" (1940). If you contrast the two films you will see the points I am trying to make, far more distinctly than I can write them.
You could also view "Watch on the Rhine" (1943) wherein the performers and writing are allowed to shine with equal brightness to the strong propaganda message.
Katherine Hepburn of course is above-average in her performance, but is overly subdued. Her character has some depth, but as an actress it appears that the director or someone has tamed her natural vibrant acting style. Please don't misinterpret this comment- she is fascinating as always and well cast in the role. I believe that her performance was subordinated to the dominance of the message.
Spencer Tracy gives a strong, believable performance. His character, however, is quite one-dimensional and relentless. Thats OK since he is supposed to be a super-patriot which is understandable in a time of war. It might have been seen as inappropriate for Tracy to have added much nuance here.
Very fine black-and-white cinematography and first-rate production values. Good supporting performances. Despite these virtues, the film overall is somewhat plodding. It does have mystery, but lacks much that is spontaneous or original.
For an exciting WWII espionage film with a similar plot and propaganda message, you can view the highly acclaimed "Foreign Correspondent" (1940). If you contrast the two films you will see the points I am trying to make, far more distinctly than I can write them.
You could also view "Watch on the Rhine" (1943) wherein the performers and writing are allowed to shine with equal brightness to the strong propaganda message.