To all the reviewers who just about used up the frequency of the use of the word "BRILLIANT", and on this non film which IF the director had actually shot with a script or an idea in mind, I will stand corrected. What this improvisational piece of "NON BRILLIANTLY PHOTOGRAPHED" of hodge podge sequences that supposedly bring truth and knowledge to the viewer of a journey of a non developed in every way semi pretty boy who is just an ordinary street hooker who meets caricatures of johns who all speak and behave in the most boorish and colorless ways that it would have me have an "awakening" after the first "trick" was mid turned. Damn, but this is terrible filmmaking and the gushing few reviews write like they know something the rest of us do not know, or ever will be capable of seeing if we did not catch it now. This is a journey of just ordinary street trash who HAS to be more attractive than his peers, because they are just so NOTHING, but, any one of them was more interesting than the lead. There also is a dearth of humor or even a shot at mystery. The "older" reviewer who waxed so endearingly of days gone by in Paris actually makes this film more depressing than it is.A pigeon could have delivered a more meaningful message.The director was likely having a good time on the casting couch, or so it would appear.
Review of Ronda nocturna
