Review of Joker

Joker (2016)
1/10
Disgusting creation in the name of movie.
24 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
If anything is less than 1 is available,I would have chosen it for this movie. First of all,it disgusts me to call it a movie. It is 2 hours dialogue delivering competition by Rajumurugan through Mannar mannan and Ponnujal voice.

I was really proud of you by reading your Vattiyum Mudalum and presented that book to many.But by seeing your movies,it simply shows that you want to make people to cry by seeing your movies.Hence you portray and design the characters of your movies according to weakness of the people and finally you turn all of them towards you.

You said in an interview that you break the screenplay rules and made the movie. In the name of movie what you have made has no screenplay,story,direction,nothing existing in that. Only fake dialogues,dialogues and dialogues till the climax. If you really want break the rules of screenplay,please watch Quentin Tarantino and Anurag kashyap movies.

In the same interview you said that I got inspired from the Movie 'Life Is Beautiful' and made the Mannar mannan character.I beg you to watch that movie once again.In that movie,Roberto Benigni wants to hide the true situation existing in the camp. In order to save his son,he was acted like that.Meanwhile The director took Only one social evil instance and engage every audience through this screenplay and direction.

Similarly,The way in which you handle the social issues in this movie shows you are an amateur. You took social problems like open defecation,sand mining,etc. But none of these problems were analysed to the roots and not conveyed completely to the audience. These problems were showed in this movie simply to blame the lack of administration. Throughout the movie you keep on blaming and criticizing.

You criticize the 3 Separation of powers (legislative,executive and judicial),then Administration and then finally through Ponnujal character you are blaming,that we(people who come to your movie) are the joker. I don't know what kind of society Rajumurugan is trying to create by quoting all of us are joker. I think you are the one to be the example for 'Perfection'.

If u want to make money,please don't influence the weakness of people. Through dialogue of the movie, you are making the people to think themselves as joker and make the people feel guilty by themselves and also get applause from them. You use the Fascist ideology very well.By instigating the peoples weakness,you turn the audience to think themselves that we(citizens) are not doing anything to the society,so we(citizens) are the JOKER. I think you are big politician than all others.

Next thing,your are not able to tolerate the critic reviewers also.The famous person criticize your first movie before 2 years,Through Mannar mannan and Isai character you mentioned their names in the second movie and you keep one dialogue that 'Freedom of Speech'is allowed to everyone.Like you said,If Freedom of Speech allowed to everyone means,then why you mentioned their names. That much of vengeance you are holding for this long period.

Political satire is not just about scolding the leaders indirectly and get applause from audience. In order to make a real movie,please concentrate on story,screenplay and direction.Please don't do the same in your upcoming movies.

ALL THE BEST RAJUMURUGAN
2 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed