The sequel to the wildly popular To Sir, with Love is perhaps the worst, most disappointing sequel ever created. To be fair, I haven't seen every sequel in the world, so there might be a worse one out there. But, given all that happened in the 1967 film, I'm sure any of you would have been able to come up with a better story than Philip Rosenberg did. It's so terrible, I'm surprised Sidney Poitier even agreed to be in it.
While it was publicized everywhere that Lulu and Judy Gleeson reprised their roles in this film, they're only in the first five minutes of the movie. If only the movie ended then. While audiences everywhere were consumed with the romantic promises in the first one, Sidney is finally given a love interest in To Sir, with Love II. It's so terribly written, I almost turned the film off. For love of Sidney, I kept watching. Feel free to take my word for it and save yourself ninety minutes. There's absolutely no aspect that makes it worth watching, and the acting isn't even any good.
While it was publicized everywhere that Lulu and Judy Gleeson reprised their roles in this film, they're only in the first five minutes of the movie. If only the movie ended then. While audiences everywhere were consumed with the romantic promises in the first one, Sidney is finally given a love interest in To Sir, with Love II. It's so terribly written, I almost turned the film off. For love of Sidney, I kept watching. Feel free to take my word for it and save yourself ninety minutes. There's absolutely no aspect that makes it worth watching, and the acting isn't even any good.