6/10
Dark, well produced, just not a fan of Roxburgh's Holmes.
28 April 2018
I fondly remember this adaptation, and haven't seen it for years, so I wondered how it would hold up since it was made back in 2002.

I hate to say it, but I feel like I'm still waiting for the defining version of this great story, I can't say I'm blown away by any version, this is another good interpretation, and ranks just behind the somewhat disappointing version featuring the legendary Jeremy Brett, and further behind Rathbone's, arguably the best telling of this story to this date.

I love the way the story is told, it's a gothic, almost hammer production, full of shocks and scares, it had a very chilling, sinister feel, which is very much like the book. A strong supporting cast, with fine performances from Liza Tarbuck and Ian Hart, plus a standout performance from Richard E Grant.

Unfortunately I really didn't care for Roxburgh in the role, he's a very good actor, but was just totally wrong for the role, lacking the charisma that the likes of Richard E Grant has by the bucket load. The less said about the dog, the better, it looked like a zombie dinosaur.

It had it's good points, but two of the main elements, notably Sherlock and the dog, let it down.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed