1/10
How do you call worse than terrible?
22 November 2020
What an absurd, ridiculous, simply awful picture! Except of course if you enter into a trance whenever Bing Crosby starts crooning in a film and do not really care at all about the rest. Then maybe you'll enjoy this. I couldn't tell. If this is not the case and you are impervious to the soft voice, blue eyes and limited acting talent of Bing, then hereafter are a number of reasons NEVER to lose 75 minutes in watching it as I did - it might seem short to you, I can assure you it does not feel like it. Pick any of these reasons - they are all valid to consider it a stinker, and the list might even be expanded :
  • the script. It is not simply silly and poor. It is extremely bad and annoying. By the way it is a transposition of the play The Admirable Crichton, which gets to be evoked by the characters at the end - and which is hopefully much better. It could not be worse at least.
  • the filming. Constantly very low-grade - for instance the shipwreck, a real disaster indeed. Clueless and humorless.
  • Carole Lombard's part. By far the worst one in which she had to waste her talent in her early career. She is a spoiled heiress - well, spoiled heiresses tended to be quite a lot of fun in comedies of the 30s, as Lombard herself more than convincingly demonstrated. Not this heiress - just plain dumb and witless character. Lombard's admirers, you should keep away. Not only will you be disappointed - you might get angry that such a poor role as a foil was offered her. Such as when she has to endure being filmed in a static shot a whole song with an expressionless crooning Bing Crosby, watching him fixedly and sort of making faces, just so as to have anything to do at all. Unaccountable, mindless cruelty to her from the director.
  • the terrible sketches by Burns and Allen. It seems they were hugely popular comedy stars of their time. Well, whenever they started reappearing in this film, I cringed while thinking "oh no please, not them again!". I love absurd, nonsensical humor - but certainly not when it is as mediocre as that.
  • the duet of princely money-chasers. Poor, poor young Ray Milland, one of them. I hope that later on he was able to smile on himself remembering he ever had to play such dismal stuff. He could - it did not ruin his career. I see that the actor playing the other prince never shot another film.
  • and finally, Droopy the bear. Poor, poor bear. After some time I was not sure which apparitions, his or Burns and Allen's I most dreaded would take place again. Droopy gets the last laugh, that is the last no-laugh, in the film. Adequate conclusion.
But I am - very slightly - unfair. Is absolutely nothing to be saved from this utter wreck? Yes, there is. The couple formed by Leon Errol and Ethel Merman have a few good fun moments, especially their refreshingly not syrupy dancing number on the boat. And if you are patient enough to wait for a whole very long hour, Lombard and Crosby are offered exactly two good replicas at the end of the film - but be warned, SPOILER, if you read them now you may then have lost the only valid reason to watch the film at all. Doris, full of expectations under the romantic moonlight : "Now tell me what you're thinking about." Sailor : "Uh, this, uh- this diagram. I-" Doris : "Sailors aren't what they used to be. No, sir. Gimme the good old sailors." Doris: "I suppose a fate worse than death awaits me." Sailor : "How do you know it's worse than death? You never been dead, have ya?" Again, do not be abused - these funny replicas are not IN THE LEAST representative of the overall picture...
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed