The Alchemist (1983) is a Charles Band feature from before his launch of Full Moon Entertainment, which I recently watched on Tubi. The story revolves around an early 1900s glassmaker cursed by an evil Alchemist. Seeking revenge, the glassmaker embarks on a journey, enlisting the help of others who share his desire for retribution.
As mentioned, this film is directed by Charles Band (Puppetmaster) and features a cast including Robert Ginty (The Exterminator), John Sanderford (Firestarter), Robert Glaudini (Mississippi Burning), and Tony Abatemarco (Sleeping with the Enemy).
This is another horror movie that had all the ingredients to become a solid 80s horror classic but falls short of its potential. The sets, costumes, and portrayal of the era are well-executed. The special effects and horror elements are decent, though they could have been more abundant. The scenes involving skin and melting are entertaining. The cinematography evokes a 70s grindhouse feel, and the science fiction elements are not bad; however, more development was needed for the ending to truly make sense.
In conclusion, this movie possesses several worthwhile elements that hint at its potential, but it lacks consistent execution. I would give it a 4.5/10 rating but still recommend giving it a watch at least once.
As mentioned, this film is directed by Charles Band (Puppetmaster) and features a cast including Robert Ginty (The Exterminator), John Sanderford (Firestarter), Robert Glaudini (Mississippi Burning), and Tony Abatemarco (Sleeping with the Enemy).
This is another horror movie that had all the ingredients to become a solid 80s horror classic but falls short of its potential. The sets, costumes, and portrayal of the era are well-executed. The special effects and horror elements are decent, though they could have been more abundant. The scenes involving skin and melting are entertaining. The cinematography evokes a 70s grindhouse feel, and the science fiction elements are not bad; however, more development was needed for the ending to truly make sense.
In conclusion, this movie possesses several worthwhile elements that hint at its potential, but it lacks consistent execution. I would give it a 4.5/10 rating but still recommend giving it a watch at least once.