Down to the Sea in Ships (1922) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
17 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Bold Man and the Sea
lugonian18 March 2004
DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS (Hodkinson Studios, 1922), presented and personally directed by Elmer Clifton, produced in New Bedford, Massachusetts, by the Whaling Film Corporation, Wholesome Film Service Inc., the New England Distributor, bears no resemblance to the 20th Century-Fox 1949 whaling saga starring Richard Widmark, Dean Stockwell and Lionel Barrymore, except in title only. As much as this could have been an earlier screen treatment to the latter seafaring adventure, the titles are the same but the storyline is not. No doubt the romantic leading players to this 1922 production, Marguerite Courtot and Raymond McKee, have little or no significance to anyone today, but for historical purposes, other than its authentic whaling expeditions and actual location shooting, it's reputation rests solely as the film that launched the career of future film star Clara Bow (1905-1965), making her motion picture debut.

With the predictable but satisfying plot about separated lovers (Courtot and McKee) and a scheming villain (J. Thornton Baston), DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS is a worthy silent film that captures the technical ingenuity of the day and the life of whaling men, at times told in documentary style. Director Elmer Clifton even imposes quotes through title cards from Herman Melville's classic whaling novel, "Moby Dick" as well as the literary works of Richard Henry Dana (author of "Two Years Before the Mast"). Many historical landmarks of New Bedford are featured, including the Apponegansett Meeting House, built in 1790, along with gardens from the museum of the Old Dartmouth Historical Society focused towards the end. Scenes such as these are sure to marvel even those present day residents of New Bedford, but it's the whaling sequences, then and now, that are highlights, along with one realistic shark attack sequence, which, naturally, did not cause any actors involved to become human sacrificed as shark bait

Though not up to the standards of today's technology of movie making, DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS goes on record as the sort of adventure story predating many of those seafaring epics popular in later years. Instead of studio bound sets with rear projection scenes, along with model ships floating in giant tanks, it's been reported that everything about this production was filmed on location. Speaking of location shooting, when DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS was presented on public television as part of its 12-week series of THE SILENT YEARS (1975), its host, Lillian Gish, who normally profiled her insight about the upcoming film inside a studio room, did her presentation on the actual site of the vessel used for this 1922 production in New Bedford, Massachusetts. She did go on in saying that while the movie lacked marquee names, it produced an unlikely star appearing in a small role, Clara Bow. An interesting introduction to the gal whose many films represented the jazz era during the roaring twenties, by which she was usually cast as an independent modern woman, immortalized as The "IT" Girl by 1927. This is where this Brooklyn, N.Y., gal got her start. Many felt Clara Bow stole the show from her leading players. Aside from her tomboyish performance which pitted her in a fist fight with another boy, she was equally memorable as the stowaway sporting a man's suit and top hat. Marguerite Courtot, who at times resembles a dark-haired Lillian Gish, particularly during the early portion of the story, interacts well with her co-star, Raymond McKee, whom she actually married by the time production was completed. McKee, who has more screen time than his leading lady, is the actual star of the film, as the bold young man taken out to sea where he conquers everything possible in order to try and win back the girl he loves. With a handful of silent films lost and gone forever, DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS is fortunate to have survived, making this the only known Marguerite Courtot movie in circulation today.

Director Elmer Clifton, who got his start under D.W. Griffith, obviously brings forth certain factors made famous by this pioneer director, such as a flashback showing the young lovers, Patience and Dexter, as children, in which Patience tries to help little Dexter to pull out a loose tooth from his mouth with a string; along with close ups and super imposing shots. One scene worth mentioning finds now adult Dexter, standing on the mast as the wind is blowing through his curly hair, looking out to sea and envisioning the image of Patience into the clouds, something similarly used in Michael Curtiz's seafaring adventure of CAPTAIN BLOOD (Warners, 1935) where Errol Flynn as Peter Blood looks out to sea with the super imposing of his lady love, Arabella (Olivia De Havilland). Quite effective on both counts.

DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS can be see occasionally on Turner Classic Movies' "Silent Sunday Nights" accompanied by William Perry piano scoring from the Paul Killian collection, the exact print used through the distribution of Blackhawk Video, and the 1975 presentation of THE SILENT YEARS. Running time being 83 minutes, it's possible it might have been a lot longer, considering a couple of noticeable abrupt cuts, such as the crew departing the vessel to go on land to bring in the supply of food and wood, Dot running through the beaches and throwing pebbles to watch the birds fly away, to suddenly go to the next sequence with crew heading out to sea to harpoon whales.

DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS could be a rough voyage to some contemporary viewers, and a whale of a time for others. Available on video cassette and later DVD from Kino International, it continues to be part of the Clara Bow collection, for whom this movie is truly dedicated. (*** whales)
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mutiny at sea
Jim Tritten7 August 2002
A domineering father has told patience Morgan that she cannot marry a man that is neither a Quaker nor a whaleman. Scenes in the Quaker meetinghouse explain that marriage outside the sect is punished by expulsion and ostracism. But she loves her childhood sweetheart Allan Dexter – recently returned from college. What is a girl to do?

Meanwhile, back in the office, villains plot to seize one of Father Morgan's ships and sail it to gold country. When one of the henchmen (Samuel Siggs) takes a liking to Patience, the fiends shanghai Allan and take him off to sea and never expect him to return. Siggs then masquerades as a Quaker and a whaleman and convinces Father Morgan to give his daughter's hand in marriage (`Make him a good wife').

The scenes in which Patience shows her love for Allan (by play acting with dolls) are sweet and show her capabilities to the fullest. Clara Bow has some good scenes early on but her small part appears to fade out as the film progresses.

There are some rather interesting scenes of life in New Bedford in the mid-19th Century. The town crier both spreads the news of a returning ship and the rumored departure of our hero to parts West. Life aboard the ship is not as harsh as portrayed by Dana in `Two Years Before the Mast' but is fraught with danger. Close ups of the crew as they mutiny are excellent. There are ample quotes from Melville and Dana to complement the story.

There are a couple of lengthy scenes that are better described as travelogues and not necessary for the story. The scenes with sharks and whales are probably real and not simulated. Dozens of pelicans diving to catch fish were probably a novelty to many viewers of the time. The storm at sea is probably about as technically advanced as it could be.

This is not a great movie, but if you are interested in sea stories or whaling, then you should watch it. It is the product of an independent film company (The Whaling Film Co.), was distributed by Wholesome Film Services, Inc., and had its debut in Providence, Rhode Island.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Still enjoyable
Havan_IronOak8 December 2003
This creaky old warhorse of a film is still eminently watchable more than 80 years after it was made.

Yes, it's a silent film of the 20's with all the ills they were heir to. The comic posturing of the actors, the overly dramatic piano accompaniment, and the simplistic plot twists necessitated by title cards. Still the basic story holds up well and the film is interesting through out. Yet with a certain amount of `willing suspension of disbelief' you find yourself caring about the characters more than you would expect.

There are some elements that make a modern audience squeamish, the whole brutal process of whaling, the slaughter of a dolphin as food, and the almost formulaic use of blacks and Native Americans in demeaning roles but those were different times. In some ways these add to the reasons that one should watch this film today, not so much as an entertainment vehicle, but as a time capsule.

Finally, this film is worth watching, as it was the first film to feature Clara Bow. The camera loves her and she adds an element of naturalness to the otherwise overly stilted acting and has moments of brilliance that would make you feel that she'd be right at home in a present day movie.
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Genuine
tedg26 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers herein.

This is as good as it gets in one direction, that's the direction where film is honest and in that honesty takes you to a place you could never visit otherwise.

In this case, it attempts to capture some of the rigid early Quaker mentality, the whaling culture and actual operations. It does only moderately well in the first two. But it does the third uniquely well, in part because it attempts all three. In this, it follows the both the subject and method of Melville.

Hard to imagine today, but the whaling industry was immense and immensely influential, It was to American society what the semiconductor industry is today. Whale oil (that special oil from the head), for instance made precision machining possible, which made the pocketwatch available to all, which made it possible to schedule meetings, which made it possible for many firms to collaborate and small business to have effect. It was the PeeCee of the times, and the reason that America is based on small business.

But the heyday of whaling was fifty years before this film, and we luckily experience much of what we can only now read about. All this is genuine, it seems, except for the `Nantucket sleighride' and Clara's shipboard scenes being in a set.

Incidentally, by the time this was made, whale oil was no longer in demand, having been replaced by the discovery that you can get oil out of the ground without being away for three years on the other side of the planet risking your life. Instead, the powerful whale industry convinced consumers to buy products made of whale baleen, the teeth of a different whale. This was a wholly advertising-driven shift which invented the corset. You don't see that here, but you see two other baleen products, the elegant umbrellas at the end and Patience's wedding bonnet.

This film was made during the end of another era, the movie business was soon to move to California. And it was not solely because of the light. It was in large part because the oil business moved from New England to California, and with it the case law that those Nantucket Quakers established. The film business today still relies on that case law to do business.

More genuineness. Clara Bow's popularity was to come from her aggressively guileless eyes. Here's where it all begins. Very impressively.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Elmer Clifton's Fantastic Voyage
wes-connors4 May 2008
"They that go down to the sea in ships, that do business in great waters; these see the works of the Lord; and his wonders in the deep." - Psalm 107

In the whaling town of New Bedford, Massachusetts, pretty Marguerite Courtot (as Patience Morgan) plays with her dolls; an adult, she longs for her girlhood days with "the boy next door". Happily, her objectification, Raymond McKee (as Thomas Allan Dexter), returns, after some years in college. Soon, Mr. McKee opens a mill, and begins to court Ms. Courtot. McKee asks her father William Walcott (as William Morgan) for Courtot's hand in marriage. But Walcott, a strict Quaker, won't allow his obedient daughter to marry outside her religion. McKee offers to convert, but finds another challenge almost insurmountable:

"Patience is a whaleman's daughter," Walcott explains, "Unless thee has thrown a harpoon into a whale, take thy story of love elsewhere. It can never be -- never!" So, McKee goes directly to the next whaling ship, hoping to harpoon a whale; instead, he is abducted, and put to work aboard. Mixing it up in the waling ship is mischievous stowaway Clara Bow (as Dot Morgan), Walcott's grand-daughter; she has an eye for cabin boy James Turfler (as Jimmy). Meanwhile, Patrick Hartigan ( as Jake Finner) and Jack Baston (as Samuel Siggs) are plotting to steal both Walcott's ship, and his daughter's virtue…

The main story, and performances of the principals are thoroughly unconvincing; although McKee does well whaling, while Courtot, the film's feminine lead, sits at home playing with her dolls. There are disturbing religious and racial undertones in the plotting. Ms. Bow, in her second film, and Mr. Turfler easily steal the attention. The Elmer Clifton direction, and photography by A.G. Penrod with Paul H. Allen are outstanding, however; and, their seafaring scenes are thrilling.

******* Down to the Sea in Ships (11/22/22) Elmer Clifton ~ Raymond McKee, Marguerite Courtot, Clara Bow
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Whaling, and Clara Bow
nycritic3 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Other than MOBY DICK and THE OLD MAN AND THE SEA and even JAWS, not many memorable movies have been made which tackle the world of fish, and this may be the only movie in which the life of Quakers and the whaling business are shown in a coherent storyline. A plot that is equal parts adventure and romance which revolves on the trials and tribulations of the Morgan family, DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS however is somewhat stilted in its presentation, but this is more due to the times in which it was made, before a real cinematic consciousness. Padding doesn't help it either, as well as some screeching over-emoting, but as an essential for anyone interested in movies from the Silent Era, this is highly recommended. Noteworthy is the fact that Clara Bow, barely sixteen, made her "official" debut in film playing a supporting part and at least in this part, DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS is also worth the view.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Film About Whales And Quakers
FerdinandVonGalitzien14 September 2006
"Down To The Sea In Ships", directed by Herr Elmer Clifton, is a film about whales and Quakers, very complicated and strange subjects to understand, those particular Amerikan subjects, for a German aristocrat, but in spite of those local subjects, the film is an evocative sailor-fashion film even for an earthly German count.

The film tells the story of a small and conservative Quaker community that lives only for whales; in the town lives a strict Quaker, William Walcott ( Charles W. Morgan ) who lost a son in a shipwreck involving, obviously…, hunting a whale; Herr Walcott has a daughter too, Patience ( Marguerite Courtot ) who must resolve her patience in order to bear such an unbearable father, a father who thinks, besides other whaling matters, that a whaleman's daughter must be none but a whaleman's wife. Dame Patience is wooed by the evil Samuel Siggs ( Herr Jack Baston ) who wants to marry her so that our heroine will lose her patience as well as her father's money, but fortunately Patience's childhood friend, Allan Dexter ( Herr Raymond McKee ) arrives to conservative Quaker town and falls in love with her; but he will not deserve Patience's love, her father says, unless he has thrown a harpoon into a whale, so, there poor Allan goes, down to the sea looking for a whale for his Patience.

Despite Dame Marguerite Courtot's ridiculous and antiquated ( even for that time ) performance, the actors play their roles convincingly, not to mention that even a young Dame Clara Bow is in the film playing "Dot" Morgan; besides, the most remarkable fact about "Down To The Sea In Ships" is that it is an excellent and evocative film about old whaling ships and times, including many literary reminiscences from Herman Melville ( quoted many times in the film ) or Joseph Conrad, remarkable saltpetre memories filmed in beautiful scenery thanks to the excellent cinematography by Herr Paul H. Allen and Herr A. G. Penrod; the film also includes interesting sequences ( almost a short documentary ) about hunting whales and how to carve them properly.

The conservative and close Quaker atmosphere is contrasted in the film with the freedom and fresh air that whaling ships need, the pious Quaker ceremonies versus the whaling ships' lawless crews; thanks to Herr Elmer Clifton's skills depicting those contrasts, "Down To The Sea In Ships" is a very well paced and remarkable sailor-fashioned film.

And now, if you'll allow me, I must temporarily take my leave because this German Count when speaking about hunting whales, remembered his particular fat German heiresses.

Herr Graf Ferdinand Von Galitzien http://ferdinandvongalitzien.blogspot.com/
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Sea Sunders True Love In Fine Silent Film
Ron Oliver20 April 2002
`Those that go DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS, that do business in great waters; these see the works of the Lord, and His wonders in the deep.' Psalms 107: 23, 24

Filmed on location in and around the old sailing center of New Bedford, Massachusetts, here is a silent film with exciting drama & action. The production values are excellent and the necessary romantic elements do not intrude on the swift flow of the plot. With kidnapping & murder, mutiny at sea & hungry sharks, the pace never slackens.

Marguerite Courtot is the pretty heroine who pines at home after her lover, sturdy Raymond McKee, is abducted and spirited off in a whaler. She is given little to do except play with her dolls and fend off a lecherous knave, but Mr. McKee is plunked right into the thick of things, engaged in all the most dangerous tasks which a whaleman must accomplish - and it is obvious that the actor is placed in some jeopardy as well.

(Beautiful Miss Courtot & handsome Mr. McKee were both popular players during silent days. They married a year after the release of DOWN TO THE SEA IN SHIPS. She ended her film career in 1923, while his did not survive the coming of talkies. They remained married for 61 years, until his death in 1984 at the age of 91. She died in 1986, aged 88.)

The film is also notable as providing the breakout role for 16-year old Clara Bow, playing the spunky niece of Miss Courtot, who becomes a stowaway on the whaler in order to be near the young cabin boy on whom she dotes. Clara is feisty and full of fight & fun and it's easy to see how this film helped make her a star. (She would enliven the rest of the silent era, but her movie career would be over before her 30th birthday. She died in 1965 at the age of 60.)

Patrick Hartigan, as a bestial seaman and J. Thornton Baston, as a half-caste Asian disguised as a Quaker, make very fine villains.

The film offers interesting insight into the lives of the New England Quakers of the 19th Century. There is also much to be learned about whaling operations and the authentic footage of the capture and dissection of a sperm whale will either fascinate or repulse the viewer. The film's opening credits give special commendation to the brave cameramen who risked their lives to photograph the thrilling footage at sea.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mostly well done & enjoyable, albeit with an asterisk attached
I_Ailurophile7 August 2023
It's worth observing at the top that this is a film where some aspects have not aged well. Not that there's any scale to such things, yet that there's some needless racist language employed, which is rather dumbfounding in the moment, might be one of the least bothersome facets. There's no missing the prominent title card in the first moments that proudly declares "Produced in New Bedford, Massachusetts by The Whaling Film Corporation"; shilling for corporations, and dressing the propaganda of repugnant values in more palatable vestiges, has clearly been a part of cinema from its earliest years. That's to say nothing of how the glorification of whaling, written into the story itself, comes off very differently one hundred years later. Moreover, even if we accept that the expression of further antiquated values is a reflection of the story's setting in the mid-nineteenth century and not the world of the 1920s, the picture leans awfully hard into affirmation of an excruciating patriarchal worldview: men choosing what women can or cannot do, or who they can marry, regardless of their wishes; bluntly valuing male children over girls; infantilizing and patronizing women. Even recognizing that for better or worse such fare of more dubious elements is a part of revisiting the silent era, there were also choices made in the construction of the feature - including some moments that were inessential to the whole - that surely mark this as nothing to change the mind of those who have difficulty engaging with older movies.

In fairness, with all this having been said, by and large 'Down to the sea in ships' is overall well done. Paul H. Allen and A. G. Penrod's cinematography is plainly admirable, especially in those lengthy sequences shot at sea. Though swimming in familiar waters, the broad strokes of the narrative are duly compelling and enjoyable. Though ill-gotten, I can't say the resources at the production's disposal weren't appreciable, for the spotlighted ship is gorgeous in and of itself, and the sets and costume design are lovely. Those stunts and effects that are employed look fantastic, and along with Elmer Clifton's vivid orchestration of scenes, an earnest sense of adventure is thusly infused into this drama. The cast give strong performances, with Marguerite Courtot standing out most as beleaguered Patience, and Raymond McKee not far behind as male love interest Allan; the picture is also noteworthy as only the second ever role of screen icon Clara Bow. Clifton also at times illustrates a keen eye for shot composition that adds a slight sense of artistry to it all. In fact, though the unsavory components here must be discussed, the strength of the film-making and storytelling is such that I think the title is better and more worthwhile than not. It may not be anything particularly special among its kin, but in general the excellence of the craft is never in question. The viewing experience is one to which an asterisk must necessarily be attached, yet for those who love what the silent era has to offer and who can abide the difficulties on hand, it still stands fairly well on its own merits.

True, even the most stout of cinephiles may be sidelined by one other glaring flaw on hand. A central whaling sequence drags on so long, far beyond the needs of the script, that I genuinely fell asleep in the middle of it (albeit with the foresight to pause). I can't help but think of the ten-minute sandstorm sequence in 'Hercules against the moon men,' mercilessly mocked in 'Mystery Science Theater 3000' as "DEEP HURTING," for sure enough the noted scene here is right about ten minutes long, too - a considerable fraction of the runtime. This sequence could have been trimmed quite a bit while losing nothing, and it goes without saying that strictly speaking the brunt of the tale would have been left intact even if some of the less welcome aspects had been altered to a small degree. That one can readily see room for improvement shows the limitations of the feature, and its weaknesses. Still, when all is said and done, 'Down to the sea in ships' remains a surviving silent film that deserves remembrance - for that survival alone, for what it does well, and definitely for what it does not. It bears repeating that this is suggested only for those who are already enamored of the era, but at that, if one happens to come across it, it's ably entertaining and also interesting as a study of where it fits into contemporary culture. Don't go out of your way for it, but one way or another it's worth a look.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautifully photographed and spectacular action film.
David-2401 March 2000
This film is about whaling - so immediately there is a problem for contemporary audiences who find the practice abhorrent. But once you get beyond that you have to appreciate the bravery of the whalers, and of the actor Raymond McKee and the camera crew! The climactic whaling sequence appears to be completely genuine - with the star in the thick of the action. If there is any trick photography here it is well ahead of its time, because nothing looks phony at all. You really feel you are there on that little boat being pulled along by a giant sperm whale. How the shots were achieved I cannot imagine - the story of the making of this film must be fascinating.

Less spectacular is the love story that provides the plot framework for the whaling sequences. Marguerite Courtet, as the tragic Quaker heroine is completely up-staged by the frenetic energy of the 17 year old Clara Bow in her film debut. Clara is a delight - and reveals the charisma that would soon make her a legend. Raymond McKee is good in the lead and very handsome - and, as I said before, really put his life at risk.

The entire film, both on sea and land, is magnificently photographed, with great use of light and shadow, and very advanced camera movement. Elmer Clifton directs with a sure hand, and the result is a hugely entertaining and often spectacular epic.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Whale of a Tale As Well as Clara Bow's Film Debut!
zardoz-1327 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The silent 1922 epic movie "Down to the Sea in Ships" looks more like a documentary about the whaling business and the religious practices of Quakers than a nail-biting melodrama about a young man who desperately wants to wed his childhood sweetheart. Today, director Elmer Clifton's seafaring saga is primarily remembered as "It" actress Clara Bow's theatrical film debut at age seventeen. The Whaling Film Corporation produced this vintage adventure and they lensed it on location at New Bedford, Massachusetts. Of course, by the time that "Down to the Sea in Ships" was produced, the whaling industry in America was on the decline because oil pumped out of the ground had replaced whale oil in most instances.

The authenticity of several sequences at sea is noted in the opening screen credits which praises the work of both cameramen A.G. Penrod and Paul H. Allen "who, in small boats, stood by their cameras at the risk of their lives to photograph the fighting whales." Literally, "Down to the Sea in Ships" reenacts the practices of New England whalers. Fans of "Flipper" may not enjoy the scene where the hero harpoons a dolphin, and the animal enthusiasts may regard the whale harvesting techniques are barbaric. Unfortunately, restored though the film is, it looks terrible and can be a real chore to watch for those that aren't accustomed to silent cinema. Moreover, you have to pause to read some of the lengthy title cards, some of which contain allusions to Herman Melville's "Moby Dick." However, on the whole, "Down to the Sea in Ships" proves to be a rewarding experience, more for its realistic depiction of religion and whale fishing than its melodrama.

"Down to the Sea in Ships" takes place in mid-19th century New Bedford. Thomas Allan Dexter (Raymond McKee) loves Patience Morgan (Marguerite Courtot) but her devout father, whaling ship-owner William Morgan (William Walcott), forbids her to marry any man that isn't a whaler. Early in the film we learn during a Quaker worship service that anybody that marries anyone that is not a Quaker is expelled and ostracized. A college graduate, Dexter refuses to let a little thing like not having served as sea aboard a whaling ship to prevent him from having Patience. Meanwhile, Jake Finner (Patrick Hartigan) and Samuel Siggs (Jack Baston) scheme to undermine Morgan's business. First, Siggs masquerades as a Quaker so that Morgan will hire him as an accountant, while Finner signs onto Morgan's whaling ship so that he can steal it. At the same time, Siggs sees the hand of Patience with her father's approval which is almost assured because Siggs has great references. You see, old man Morgan's son perished in a whaling accident and he wants grand children so he compels Patience against her will to betroth herself to the villainous Siggs. Siggs fears Dexter and Finner drugs the young suitor and shanghais him for the voyage. As it turns out, this works out to Dexter's advantage.

Similarly, Morgan's granddaughter Dot Morgan (Clara Bow) has a crush on Jimmie (James Thurfler), the cabin boy. Dot disguises herself as a boy and sneaks aboard the ship, only to be discovered by Jimmie after the vessel has gone to sea. Unbelievably, Dot remains hidden below deck in a cloth covered box until the evil Finner finds her. Finner kills the captain and takes over the ship, but Dexter recovers the ship from Finner and imprisons him. The whalers catch a whale and Dexter is instrumental in harpooning the beast and bringing it back. The scene where Dexter's boat capsizes after the whale attacks it is fabulous stuff, especially when the real-life shark swims into view and menaces the men as they scramble back into their boat. Eventually, the sailors exhaust the whale and return to the ship with it.

Film historians and film buffs will enjoy this glimpse of the past. The film covers the themes of man versus man, man versus society, women versus society and their confining role in society. For the record, this version of "Down to the Sea in Ships" has nothing to do with 20th Century-Fox's 1949 whaling saga starring Richard Widmark, Dean Stockwell and Lionel Barrymore.

Interestingly, director Elmer Clifton worked as an assistant director to the famed D.W. Griffith on "The Birth of a Nation" and "Intolerance." One of his more notorious films that he helmed was the 1937 cautionary movie "Assassin of Youth," also known under the title "Marihuana!"
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This marks the end of an era....
planktonrules22 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
By 1922, the once huge whaling industry in the United States was all but dead. With the new popularity of petroleum products, whale oil was no longer needed and at the time this film was made, only once port in the US still had whaling ships (New Bedford). In fact, the final ship would stop hunting for whales in 1927. So, this film (shot in New Bedford, Connecticut) was one of the last films that documents this industry. So, despite being a fictional drama, it's also an important historical document. While some might blanch at seeing the crew killing porpoises and other whales, it is interesting to see the men at work. And, it's hard to imagine folks doing something this dangerous on a routine basis.

As for the print of "Down to the Sea in Ships", at times it's pretty poor. At the beginning especially, the print is both scratchy and fuzzy. But considering the film is nearly 90 years old, it's actually in pretty good shape and hopefully you can ignore the deficiencies.

The story concerns a Quaker family that runs a whaling operation. The patriarch is a proud man who wants his daughter to marry a Quaker who works in the industry. What he doesn't know is that his new trusted employee, Mr. Siggs, is a phony. He pretends to be a Quaker and wishes to marry the owner's sweet daughter, Patience, so he can steal the family fortune. Standing in his way is Allan--a man who grew up with Patience--but a man who the father does not want to marry her since Allan is neither a Quaker nor a whaler. But, just to be certain Allan doesn't get her, Siggs gets Allan out of the way--by having Allan shanghaied on one of the family's whaling ships.

During the course of this whaling voyage, Allan turns out to be terrific whaling man and takes to it very well. He also turns out to be a hero. That's because Patience's niece (Dot--played by Clara Bow) stowed away aboard the ship and when the cruel Captain discovered her, he had every intention of raping her. So, Allan leads a mutiny and imprisons the Captain. Can they manage to complete the voyage, return with the Captain in irons AND stop Siggs in time from marrying the incredibly virtuous Patience?!

For 1922, this is an incredibly well made film. The whaling scenes are incredibly well shot and took a lot of trouble and the story itself is complex and enjoyable. It's well worth seeing. Plus, it gives you a good chance to see a very young Clara Bow in her second role. I was actually surprised to see how young and chunky she looked--as she changed considerably in the ensuing years into a sex symbol. Here, she just looks like an awkward tom-boy teenager--which she was.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A surprise from Elmer Clifton!
JohnHowardReid11 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Not copyright by Whaling Film Corporation. Released through W.W. Hodkinson Pictures: 4 March 1923. Originally 12 reels, but cut to 9 reels of 8,900 feet for general release.

COMMENT: A mighty achievement from producer director Elmer Clifton of all people, this is a beautifully photographed, superbly staged epic that would do credit to D.W. Griffith or Cecil B. DeMille.

Filmed on real locations and backed by a truly lavish budget, this movie is one of the highlights of silent cinema.

Admittedly its whaling theme is off-putting, but there's no denying the courage of both whalers and actors in making this record of an activity that seems right of kilter with Quaker ideals.

Young Clara Bow steals the limelight from the then super-popular star Marguerite Courtot, but Raymond McKee more than holds his own as the hero. The villains, Tilton and Baston make masterful opponents.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cliched in the stone age... but Clara Bow's first film
du_man1 December 2003
In the late 19th Century, aged Quaker Charles Morgan (William Walcott) owns a whaler, but no longer goes out on it. Unfortunately, the, ah, nefarious Siggs wants to marry Morgan's daughter Patience (Marguerite Courtot), but she's in love with the, um, good, wonderfull childhood friend Allan (Raymond McKee), but her father won't let her marry a non whaler so he... um... well... allright. If you don't know what's going to happen, you must be a hermit. And quite a hermit.

The story of the silent historical "drama" is so old and cliched people living in the stone age would have been bored and found it predictable. It's fast paced, but so stunningly predictable that it's extraordinarily boring. It's hard to stick through its 83 minutes that seem to last forever. And there aren't even any interesting complications

However, there are two good things that almost redeem the film. First, there are the historical scenes. The whaling scenes, while they take too long to get to, are very well made and detailed. The scenes at home were done in a real Quaker village and seem extremely authentic. The mutiny is great. And the scene where a whale is dragging around a smaller ship, pulling it over near surfing-height waves is awesome and thrilling.

The second thing that's good is a supporting cast member. This was Clara Bow's first film, and she is excellent. While the rest of the cast is good enough, she puts them too shame in a small role. If only it had been bigger. Much bigger...

So, every now and then, it's fun.

So, do I recomend it? Of course, if you couldn't possibly ever stand a silent film, avoid this like the plague. It will merely confirm your suspision that silent films stunk. Watch one like Battleship Potemkin instead. On the other hand, if you're a die-hard Clara Bow fan or interesting in late 19th-century whaling techniques, see this if you can. But don't look for anything you haven't seen before. Or that many things that are particularly interesting. Just watch Clara Bow when she comes on.

Rating: * * (out of four)
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
CLARA BOW CAPTURED THIS ENTIRE SILENT FILM!!
whpratt19 August 2003
Clara Bow, the "IT" GIRL of Hollywood, who was exploited by her directors and under-paid for all her roles, showed her great talent in this film. Clara Bow played "Dot" Morgan, daughter to Patience Morgan (Marguerite Courtat) "Silas Marner"'22 and Raymond McKee(Thomas Allan Dexter) "Uncle Tom" 1929. If you have never seen a silent screen film with a great actress of all time, view this film and enjoy the great talents of Clara Bow who was given low budget films and never complained, she just wanted to perform from her very heart(Even her own mother tried to Kill Her) and soul and that is all that matter to this great Classic Film Star, who will be remembered forever and ever!
1 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Whaling in the 1800s
rigoletto3395 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Everybody else has told you about the film. We saw it earlier today (July 2011) at a museum. It was shown as an addition to a scrimshaw exhibit.

The version we saw was listed as 101 minutes, longer than the IMDb data.

If you've read Moby Dick, none of the whaling scenes are new to you. This film records almost every detail. One thing that strikes me is the comparison between Stone Age man, hunting mastodons, armed with nothing but spears and raw courage; and the early whalers, a dozen men on small rowboats, armed only with harpoons and raw courage. I imagine the toll of hunters was similar in both cases.

Clara Bow's debut made it certain she would go on to bigger things. A few seconds of Clara reminded me a lot of Shirley Temple.

The story is a little weak: the last-minute - no, last-second - rescue of the heroine stretched belief, but the basic idea is, the Good Guy vanquishes the Bad Guy, wins the Girl, and they live happily ever after.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed