Never Bug an Ant (1969) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
At Least the Music's Good
boblipton16 October 2005
The Ex-Warner-Brothers team from Termite Terrace left to form DePatie-Freleng and did a bunch of poor work. 'The Ant and the Aardvark' series was one of theirs. It was like the Roadrunner series, but from hunger.

In this one, Aardvark tries to catch the ant using sugar cubes and fishing gear. The animation is poor, the backgrounding is ugly and the characters are one-note. -- all the writing talent that made Looney Tunes a success was missing.

About the only thing that is consistently interesting about the DePatie-Frelengs is the music. This one sports a small Dixieland-style score. That won't make it worth your while.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Everyone's entitled to an opinion.
amorrice8018 March 2006
But in my view, what the previous commentator described are what made the series (in particular this episode) so entertaining! I love the backgrounds, and would love to know how Dick Ung and Tom O'Loughlin did that thing with the spots and paint crease effects. I would love to be able to get that music on CD. I also like the way that some of the guide-lines are left in on this short, gives the film a rough, primitive feel to it which adds to the nature of the hunger chase idea. I like the voices too. i'd like to track down more of John Byners's work.

"What do you think of that? (BOOM) I know what I think of that, but I shouldn't say it in public."
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Certainly didn't bug me
TheLittleSongbird25 March 2020
Am very understanding as to why the Ant and the Aardvark cartoons may not work for all tastes, it is a very formulaic series in terms of story, and it's a formula that are reminiscent of other cartoon series that do it a little better, and not everybody is going to like the animation. Mostly the animation is not a problem for me in the Ant and the Aardvark series and the irreverent dialogue, fantastic music, John Byner's voice acting and the entertaining characters make up for things.

Every single one of the above applies to the Ant and the Aardvark series' sixth cartoon 'Never Bug an Ant'. While not a classic strictly speaking to me it was still very enjoyable and as good as the previous five Ant and the Aardvark cartoons, as far as the previous cartoons in the series the previous one 'Technology, Phooey' is particularly good and the one closest to being a classic (also one of the closest to that standard for the whole series too). Regarding the previous comments, can see both sides while tending to share the opinions of those that remember the series fondly.

'Never Bug an Ant' is another very funny Ant and the Aardvark cartoon. While the gags are crisply timed and raise big smiles frequently, especially the Aardvark's reactions, it's the dialogue (rich in witticisms, sarcasm and breaking the fourth wall) where the best laughs come from. As a matter of fact, while the series was always successful in both the physical comedy and verbal comedy, for me the dialogue often tended to be funnier and cleverer than the visual gags. The "hey ant, what do you think of that? I know what I think of that, but I shouldn't say it in public" line is priceless, with the banker line is a close second.

Personally have always loved the Ant and the Aardvark characters. They are far from complex, that was true for all of DePatie-Freleng Enterprises' characters, but their personalities really shine as does their comic timing (especially the Aardvark's, whose material is funnier here in 'Never Bug an Ant'). Their chemistry is a long way from bland too and is well-contrasted. John Byner's voice work excels brilliantly in giving individuality to both characters and making them act and sound very different to each other instead of being the same.

The animation is richly coloured and the backgrounds are stylised but never came over as under-budgeted to me. The expressions and reactions for the Aardvark are as well done as the backgrounds and the individual colours for the Ant and the Aardvark blend very nicely with the richer and more varied backgrounds. What plays majorly in 'Never Bug an Ant's', and the series in general, appeal is the music, the light-heartedness and the infectiously jazzy style never jars and the use of instruments and ensemble, featuring some of the best jazz musicians of the day, never ceases to be very clever.

It does have to be said that the story is very thin, even for the short running time, and the way it's structured with a tried and tested formula is very more of the same, not much surprising or original here.

Have always been mixed regarding the sucking objects through the nose gag. There has always been effort to give variety and there have been clever and funny uses of it, but due to its frequent use (in pretty much every cartoon) it can feel a bit repetitive and it did here.

Summing up, very nicely done. 8/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed