The Claudia Case (1979) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
A disservice for those curious in knowing about the actual case
Rodrigo_Amaro7 December 2023
"The Claudia Case" got a rewatch from me this year after almost 20 years later, mostly because a) it didn't get a review and b) a current real-crime binge. It was a mess back then, it's still a mess later on but it got slightly better. But truth be told Miguel Borges film was a major disservice to people curious in knowing about the murder of young 21-year-old Cláudia Lessin Rodrigues in 1977. At the end of it all, it claims it was a fictional story, even though initially you feel like you're watching a re-enactment of events (it's slightly factual though) and then changes to tell a fictional longer story about another girl (Kátia D'Angelo) who could fall for the same entraptment that the real Cláudia went for. It was completely disrespectful to Cláudia's family and it was made way too soon.

The first half covers the murder of a girl named Cláudia and it follows the facts quite accurately, with an investigative reporter (Carlos Eduardo Dolabella) and a police investigator (Roberto Bonfim) joining forces to track down the killers. Then there's the rich kids (Jonas Bloch and Luiz Armando Queiroz) trying to dodge things as it becomes clear they had something to do with the murder. Bloch's character was inspired by Otto Frank and you could research about what happened to him.

Then comes the other half where another girl becomes acquainted with a fake-rich type (Nuno Leal Maia) who seduces her and that's where the film breaks down, moving a litte away from the investigation and following those two. And it's so weird because this guy is connected to other folks whose main goal are to seduce and drug girls, yet they never meet the other rich kids. And it gets to such a down point with pointless scenes which includes one of hers with a tough guy inside of a refrigeration truck packed with meet.

Basically, it worked well for the first 30-40 minutes, and when it got back to the investigative parts, it also works, but the whole other part of the story of showing predatory characters and dark scenes, the movie doesn't succeed. What's telling us? What's the urgency? And the ultimate message that killing "clients" is good for business just makes me no sense.

The actual case taught us many things about how young women and girls were treated, and there's so little that could be done to keep them from harm. It didn't change much, but the debate continues.

As for the movie, two thumbs down means no redemption (it's joined by two other films as of now). I'm not watching this again. 3/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed