A Unicorn in the Garden (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Straightforward yet inspirational for one of my animation projects
Stompgal_8730 May 2013
I found this cartoon on YouTube while I was doing some research on cel-animated dialogues as part of a university assignment. Although everything about this cartoon is simple (the character designs, lip-sync and colour scheme especially), the unicorn is cute and the garden is beautifully designed. The animation is also straightforward yet impressive since it uses basic principles such as exaggeration (when the man's arm stretches to close the blinds), squash and stretch (the woman stretching upwards and the psychiatrist squashing downwards) and staging (in particular the arrangement of the policemen, women and psychiatrist sitting down when the woman reports what her husband saw). I also thought the background music was pleasant and the moral was decent.

All in all this is a rare gem that was well worth the search, in spite of its somewhat repetitive dialogue, and reminiscent of classic Aesop's fables. 8/10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dark but clever
planktonrules15 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This story is based on a James Thurber story. It's told using very simple Thurber-style drawings.

A man sees a unicorn in the garden. He tells his evil and cranky wife and she tells him to get lost. Again he sees the unicorn and wakes her once again. She tells him they are mythical creatures and tells him again to get lost. Then, she gets out of bed and calls a psychiatrist and the police to have him committed. When they arrive, they think she's crazy. The beleaguered husband, when asked about the animal, responds that "unicorns are mythical creatures" at which point they shove a straight jacket on her and take her away as the film ends.

While this is a cute and moderately diverting cartoon, it definitely has a dark edge to it, as both husband and wife are pretty sinister people. Worth a look but younger kids will probably get nothing out of it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Somewhat entertaining
Horst_In_Translation30 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
"The Unicorn in the Garden" is an animated short film from 1953, which had its 60th anniversary a couple years ago and tells us the story of a husband and his wife. And a unicorn! The man sees a unicorn in the garden and tells his wife. She says it's nonsense, but he is resilient and finally gets his wife to take a look. Of course, by then the unicorn is long gone if it ever existed at all. The wife is downright evil though and tries to get her husband sent to a psychiatric ward to get rid of him, but her plan is not working in the very end. The ending was pretty cruel, but also entertaining. I must still say it went against the first couple minutes. So there never was a unicorn and it was just the man's plan and the audience was fooled? I am not sure. But I don't even dare asking if there really was a unicorn in the garden? Because the answer obviously would be: Of course not! A unicorn is a mythical creature. Little fun cartoon. Go see it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Unicorn in the Garden
CinemaSerf16 February 2024
This starts off as a cheery and colourful animation that sees a gent sitting at his breakfast table who glances out the window and sees a unicorn feeding on his roses! Astonished, he runs to fetch his rather over-bearing wife to tell her, but she's uninterested and thinks he's flipped his lid. It's there next time he goes to his garden and he even starts to bond with the creature. This time, his wife is convinced he's lost the plot so sends for the men in the little white coats! Thing is, her shrink "Dr. I. Ego" has other ideas as to who said what to whom and next thing, well you have to watch and see. It's of it's time, remember, so some of the 1950s language is a little inappropriate, but the twist at the end is well worth watching it for.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clever visual jokes
preppy-320 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Animated short about a man who sees a unicorn eating flowers in his garden one morning. He tells his wife who refuses to believe him and tries to have him committed...but it doesn't end up that way.

The animation is a mess and the voices of the man and his wife don't quite match the drawings but I liked it. It was only 7 minutes long, the narrator was good and there are a load of clever visual jokes throughout. Also the music perfectly fits the mood of the piece. The moral of the story is puzzling and doesn't seem to make a lot of sense. Still, all in all, it's a fun short. I have nothing more to say but we do have to have 10 lines of text for every review so I had to write this sentence out:)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why wasn't this nominated for an Academy Award?
llltdesq17 October 2000
The failure of AMPAS to nominate this cartoon for an Oscar is unbelievable! Granted, it was a good year for animated shorts and a good year particularly for UPA-Columbia, but this cartoon is simply delightful! Written by James Thurber and animated in Thurber's artistic style, it is his world come to life! If you like James Thurber, you'll love this cartoon, probably as much as I do! Highly recommended.

Edit: Since I posted this particular comment, I discovered just why it wasn't nominated for the Academy Award for Animated Short Subject-it was never submitted to AMPAS for consideration, because Stephen Bosustow was, for some reason, not pleased with the end results. I think that it's a marvelous piece of work, but without submission for consideration, the Academy could not nominate the short. I've since watched it several times and it is still highly recommended.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Little too Outdated for its Own Appeal
elicopperman30 July 2021
While UPA is often revered as one of the most innovative animation studios of its time to this day, that's not to say they hit the mark every single time. In addition to the dwindling Mr. Magoo series, they embraced the art of animation to a point where they ended up dipping into feets of pretension and indulgence, especially when trying to come off as too high brow for the mainstream crowd. One of the biggest offenders is their 1953 adaptation of the James Thurber fable, The Unicorn in the Garden. Despite being hailed as a truly magnificent piece of film within the animation field, it might not exactly hold up in the modern age quite as smoothly.

The basic premise of the short follows a man who informs his wife that he saw a unicorn in their front garden, only for the wife to attempt getting him back for such a make believe lie. While very simple in both concept and execution, the main theme of the story is to not expect one's hopes to be an utter certainty. As this theme is presented through a bitter marriage, the single downfall of this entire short is how outdated it is by modern standards. Given that this was made at a time when the media would often route for the henpecked husband over the aggressive wife, the whole film ends up becoming less about embracing make believe than it does about miserable married couples outsmarting one another. What isn't helped is how much they play around with the wife being mischievous, even if she has every right to get back at her seemingly looney husband. Perhaps the short might have worked better as a full blown thriller instead of a comedy, but alas, what we get is a sad case of revenge between two middle aged people who should have just gotten divorced.

In terms of better qualities, the art direction is nothing short of brilliant, especially since the film brings the simplified graphic Thurber style into animation gorgeously. While the character and layout design are far more minimalized than the average UPA short as a result, the character animation, specific staging and color direction allow the film to present itself in the best way it possibly can. If a scene calls for ambience, the colors are bright and cheery; if a scene needs to come off as disturbingly brooting, grim shadows will plague the light; if a scene needs to be mellow, the character's inner thoughts will come out clear as day. The score by David Raskin comes off very melodious while still having a certain level of uneasiness all throughout the short's narrow length. It's almost as if the short is meant to be a dream of sorts, especially when one could never possibly see a scenario presented in the film ever accompanying reality. And yet, despite that possible theory, it's nevertheless unclear as to whether we can laugh or mourn over the dysfunctional marriage happening on screen.

So is Unicorn in the Garden truly another magnificent triumph within the UPA filmography? It may depend on who you ask, for it could either be seen as a witty satire on non trustworthy relationships or a failed artistic interpretation on exploring marriages. Whenever one might imagine a single entity that could easily come off as too high brow for its own good, an easy answer could be this, just like many other UPA experiments that would try to bite off more than they could chew in terms of speaking their minds on what makes strong artistic content. Alas, don't count your boobies until they're hatched.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
True Spirit of A Unicorn
cyberknight21 November 2004
Very few movies can truly capture the spirit of its subject. "The Last Unicorn" literally changed my life, my way of seeing the world, of understanding why people do what they do, and what is my role in it. But, before that, there was "The Unicorn in The Garden". It is not an ordinary movie, it is "sincere", like very few artworks turn out to be, mainly nowadays. It's not that computer generated graphics and super surround sounds are not a wonder to see and hear, but if you don't have a good story to hold everything in place, all you get are some minutes of entertainment that you will just forget after you watch the next movie. The opposite is not true, though. If you have a good story, and you know how to tell it, then it doesn't matter how your graphics look, or that the sound doesn't shake your guts every time something explodes on the screen, and the makers knew that. "The Unicorn in The Garden" has a wonderful story, it is extremely well told, with a good "timing", and even the graphics, that may seem "drafty", at first, have their purpose, they enhance the focus on the story and not in the action (no, it is not an excuse, it's easy to see that watching other U.P.A. productions of the same time). A must-see to all Unicorn lovers...
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Unicorn in the Garden is another excellent UPA animated short
tavm13 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
James Thurber's The Unicorn in the Garden, as animated by the artists of UPA Studios, is a wonderfully humorous fable about the glories of imagination and the follies of bitterness. The man here represents the former and his wife, the latter. Whether we are meant to believe the man really saw the unicorn or dreamt the whole thing in order to get his wife committed should probably be up for someone else to consider but it's obvious he wasn't happy for a long time with her around and was very glad when she was sent away. Half of me wondered when the wife talked to the psychiatrist whether the doctor himself had seen a unicorn and wanted to protect himself when the husband made the "mythical creature" remark and not reveal he had indeed seen one before. Of course, all that is hearsay so I'll just say that UPA has made another great animated short that should be a classic forever and ever!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ah, that war between man and woman....
theowinthrop19 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Unlike his close friend and fellow humorist Robert Benchley, James Thurber was never able to become a movie personality and actor. There talents were equally wonderful as writers and humorists, but Benchley (despite some alcoholic problems) was basically photogenic. You look at him in his films and see someone...well who was worthy to both listen to the voice and watch the physical presence. Thurber was handicapped - literally. He was a tall, thin man, who had been injured in his youth accidentally - it resulted in him having worsening and worsening eyesight until he finally went blind before his death in 1961. The American public has tolerated many physical problems, and even once gave a best supporting Oscar to Harold Russell, a genuine war hero and double hand amputee. But it would have been more than it could expect to support a film career for an exceptionable writer that everyone knew could barely see the film set.

It is as a creative writer of comedy (THE SECRET LIFE OF WALTER MITTY, THE BATTLE OF THE SEXES, MY WORLD AND WELCOME TO IT, THE WAR BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN) that Thurber left his mark on screen. And bless 'im for it. But there is much that was never tried because Thurber wrote in so many styles, from plays (THE MALE ANIMAL) to short stories (MITTY), to essays comical ("THE MACBETH MURDER MYSTERY"), to serious historical essays on crime ("A KIND OF GENIUS" - about Willie Stevens, one of the defendants in the Hall - Mill Murder Case). One thing he liked was the old form of the fable, a la Aesop. As he was a cartoonist of great ability as well as writer, his fables frequently were accompanied by the drawings of his imagination of his scenes. When he did a series on the "THE LAST FLOWER" every event is a captioned cartoon.

Modern readers of the female sex will not be quite so fond of Thurber as I happen to be - he being male, his views of women are generally hostile (witness Mrs. Mitty, in the short story - a shrewish wife). This is an unfortunate habit of his - like similar habits found in other comic geniuses like W.C.Fields and Laurel & Hardy. Except Fields and Stan & Ollie had some nice women (or understandable ones) occasionally. I have to acknowledge this misogyny as a dark point against Thurber. I can't, off hand, think of a similar female writer with a serious comic grudge against males.

One of his best comic fables - in fact the one most people recall - is "THE UNICORN IN THE GARDEN". It is a very clever and unexpected example of the worm turning.

A husband has woken up on a week-day before his wife, and is making his breakfast. As he eats the breakfast he looks outside the window at the kitchen nook and sees a unicorn calmly in the garden, munching grass and roses. The amazed husband goes out and looks at the beautiful unicorn (Thurber's drawing is actually simple and lovely) in silence. He gets excited and runs up-stairs to tell his wife.

In the cartoon we have already HEARD the wife, angrily wanting to know about the noise she heard (a dropped egg earlier). Now the husband is trying to show his wife the wonderful site of nature or whatever inside their garden. But she is angry or mean, and dismisses the news with a snide, "The unicorn is a mythical beast". It disheartens the husband who goes down to the garden again. This time he feeds the unicorn a lily, and he pats it's horn. He races upstairs again to tell the wife what he has just done. And now she becomes threatening and says, "You are a booby, and I'll have you put in a booby hatch." He angrily replies, "We'll see about that!".

The conclusion of the film follows how the wife does try precisely what she threatens. She calls a psychiatrist and the police and requests they bring a straight jacket with them. Then she tells them what the husband said, and how he must be crazy. But by now the actual unicorn is gone, and the husband is just quietly napping under a tree. The wife is considered insane and bundled into the jacket. Her fate is capped off by the husband telling the doctor that everyone knows a unicorn is a mythical beast. As the wife is taken away in protest, the husband smiles at the reader.

The moral is given: Don't count your boobies before they are hatched.

This cartoon followed the basic drawings of Thurber in the original version, and filled them out quite well. Gently told, and compactly, it is a small marvel of a comic genius of the middle 20th Century.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
delightful
guenzeld23 February 2011
A simple story told simply and well.

Director Bill Hurtz, who would later in his distinguished career go on to work on the brilliant and funny Jay Ward cartoons, does grand work here in tying the story together with great visuals and taught story-telling.

Alas as one of the reviews shows us there are thin-skinned people who will feign outrage because of Mr Thurber's desire to be simply humorous. While enjoying the film these people feel the inner need to throw out cant words like "misogyny" in order to boldly ride the righteous horse. Don't be put off the cartoon by observations like these. Just sit back and enjoy it.

And don't be mortally offended if someone tries to kid you a little.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Great James Thurber
Hitchcoc22 December 2015
I remember reading this story in middle school. I became enamored with the wonderful wit and insights of James Thurber. I thought "The Night the Bed Fell" to be one of the funniest stories ever written, all under the guise that these were Thurber's relatives. This tale is a short one. We empathize with the husband whose I'll-tempered wife won't listen to him. He sees a unicorn in the garden eating roses and wants so badly to be listened to. When his dreams are crushed, he manages to work things out to his advantage. It reveals a real sense of justice. Thurber's simple drawings still create wonderful personality among his characters. One of the best animations I've seen despite its simplicity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Husband, Wife, Unicorn
Michael_Elliott6 November 2012
The Unicorn in the Garden (1953)

*** (out of 4)

Charming and at times funny short from UPA has a husband seeing a unicorn eating flowers in his garden so he tells his wife who basically tells him to shut up and go on. The husband then sees the unicorn again and once again his mean wife pushes him away. After the second time the wife decides to call a mental hospital to report her husband. I'm not going to spoil where the film goes from here but there's no question that this animated short is very funny and the twist at the end is certainly good enough to make the film worth sitting through. Once again I can see how some might not enjoy the visual look of UPA but I think it really works well here and especially the scenes with the unicorn and the bright yellow background. I also thought the husband character was very charming and a perfect mix for the mean and dark wife. The animation fits the material quite well and I think fans of the genre should really enjoy it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed