User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Typical Biopic, Retelling of Story in ORF Production
marcin_kukuczka1 September 2022
A lot of people compare this movie to the ultra-famous AMADEUS by Milos Forman and, indeed, there are similarities between the two films. However, while AMADEUS is a dramatisation, a vision by P. Schaffer, the legacy of the composer seen by the jealous eye of Salieri, from the standpoint of his rival, here is it a typical biopic of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. As penned by Zdenek Mahler and directed by Juraj Herz with contribution by Kurt J. Mrkvicka, this movie is a retelling of a story, of a short life but a life immensely rich in its legacy. There are a few reasons why I consider it a must-see for anyone interested in the composer's life.

First of all, when contemporary people hear the name MOZART, they usually associate it with Vienna. And rightly so because he is one of the three major Viennese composers along with Haydn and Beethoven. But, he was born in Salzburg, a pearl of the Salzkammergut area where he breathed music from his earliest years and the first 30 minutes of the film are dedicated to his childhood. The story is set in Salzburg, filmed in Salzburg with the family background, including Mozart's mother and sister, whom we don't find in other films about the composer. A genius child, however, grown an emotional bond with his father Leopold (played by Toni Boehm) He is taught music by him and soon plays the piano at the imperial court in Vienna and the papal court in Rome. The little Mozart is wonderful in the film, so brave and so genuine saying "The concert must be difficult"...what a line uttered by a child. There is a lovely scene filled with later anticipation of his career when he plays at Maria Theresia's (the empress at the time), a little dog runs to him and Mozart says to a little princess "I'll marry you when I grow up"...As he did not become a prince in the very meaning of this word, he became a prince of music, in a way, or even an emperor.

Secondly, it is Alexander Lutz's performance that makes the film memorable. The actor from Vienna does not portray Mozart in the same manner as Tom Hulce did in AMADEUS. There is no imitation and that is good because that would be barely creative. Lutz indeed does not leave such a lasting impact on the viewer with the loud laughter that rings in your ears long after you have finished watching the movie but I think that Lutz's Mozart is more reliable historically. He is childish yes, and childlike at the same time; he is stubborn, ridiculous at certain moments; he is also peculiar in decisions and prone to influences of certain people and situations; he is ignorant, yet he is a person who manages to maintain the flame of the divine talent placed upon his mind and heart. He makes a credible Mozart in the scene in Rome when, together with his father, he secretly listens to Allegri Miserere and is caught by the Swiss guard (the beautiful notes of the music were kept secret in the Vatican for many years). He is memorable as the one who plays his compositions to the archbishop and makes him "stay in church for longer." He is really appealing to us as a friend of billiards game with Casanova. Finally, he is so tragic as a member of freemasonry and a devoted man who becomes sort of "slave to his music" and addicted to quite "harmful sources of inspiration."

Besides, the movie can boast a wonderful use of Mozart's music. Different masterpieces are incorporated in the scenes and dramatized with the events from Mozart's life; such as the opera DON GIOVANNI or the famous AVE VERUM that he composes in church and leaves certain of his listeners awe inspired. Many, however, do not appreciate his talent and use him for their own means. There is a wonderful scene when he compares himself to his favourite bird that dies 'misunderstood.' The music parallels to joys and sorrows of his life, resembles those rises and falls, depicts a man filled with torments.

I wish there were more scenes that depict the relation of Mozart and emperor Josef II. We have those mentions, there is one moment when Mozart simply submits to the timetable of the emperor's day and gives a concert at 5 in the morning in the park. But that was far better developed in AMADEUS.

An ORF / ZDF production that we could once see on our Polish TV left a lasting impression on me and I would definitely recommend people to see this film as a slightly different view on the composer's life and legacy: perhaps, one of the if not the greatest musical genius of all time.

Just standing at the monument of Mozart in the Viennese Burggarten, I wondered how many more sublime compositions we would have now if he had lived for these 10 or 20 years longer. However, great geniuses usually come and go soon...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Something different than Amadeus
anntoanette4 June 2006
Surprises with how much the director fit in it. If we compare it with "Amadeus", we do see several big differences: Amadeus is longer and only focuses on Mozart's adult life, while "Wolfgang" is half that length and tells us much more about His childhood too. Maybe it will be a bit hardly understandable for someone who doesn't know Mozart and the persons around Him, but I definitely do recommend seeing it to everybody, for it is indeed unforgettable. Alexander Lutz is also a very well chosen actor-not only is he much alike to His character, he also plays well, just as everyone else after all... It is a bit like a fairy-tale, with all those princesses and anecdotes in it...
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Where is it?
sandrasmile9124 June 2006
I haven't seen the whole film, only about half of it. I was sitting up one late night switching channels on the TV, when I found this on the Austrian channel ORF. And because I am deeply devoted to Mozart, I adored every second of this film.

I agree with "Antoannette" (who wrote the previous comment) in the fact that it may be difficult to understand for those who don't know much about Mozart and the people around him, but since it is an excellent film and very beautiful, I would recommend anyone to see it!

The only problem is: I CAN'T FIND IT!!! Since I saw it on TV I have searched for it to buy on DVD or VHS, but NO WHERE can I find it. Not even in Vienna, where they have a shop with all Mozart-films!

If someone has any information about this film, or even HAS it, please contact me on: sandrasmile91@yahoo.se

Watch this movie if you want to see something wonderful! Love, Sandra
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fantastic movie!
dirtyhellcam10 October 2020
Mozart, the Shakespeare of music! I would absolutely recommend you to watch it!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amadeus (1984) = More fiction, Mozart (1991) = More facts.
calterhaug9 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I am not saying Amadeus (1984) is a bad film, it is in fact very entertaining, but for all the Mozart-geeks out there, or just someone who loves Mozart, Wolfgang A. Mozart (1991) will certainly deliver to your expectations. One reason for this is that it takes real known facts about Mozart's life and blends it with colorful cinematic images. Examples include Mozart's devotion to the Weber-family's eldest sister Aloysia Weber, how the Requiem mass was commissioned by count Franz von Walsegg (not Salieri, like in Amadeus), how Süßmayr helped Mozart complete the Requiem (once again, not Salieri), or how the family doctor Dr. Nikolaus Closset tapped Mozart's blood which might have contributed to his early death. Another reason is the great acting, the lead actor, Alexander Lutz (among others), does an outstanding job as portraying our beloved musical genius.

All in all a great film, 10/10!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed