The performances were good. One male lead was particularly good. The cinematography was horrible. I do not buy the explanation that the camera-work was "aesthetic" choices following "Dogma 95" style. (ie., no lighting other than ambient lighting etc.) The sound was good and the soundtrack OK. But the camera-work made me ill. It would go out of focus and there was a need for a tripod or a dolly at times. It was shot on DV but it is a weak example of the quality one can get with mini-dv when lit properly.
But the fatal flaw was it had no story. After the first act, the lack of a script was evident in the structurally flawed movie. I don't know anyone who saw it that recommends it. One word describes it: boring.
But the fatal flaw was it had no story. After the first act, the lack of a script was evident in the structurally flawed movie. I don't know anyone who saw it that recommends it. One word describes it: boring.
