"Law & Order" Entrapment (TV Episode 1997) Poster

(TV Series)

(1997)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"A policeman is your best friend"
TheLittleSongbird21 April 2021
"Entrapment" has a very gutsy topic, 'Law and Order' and the entire 'Law and Order' franchise were no strangers to challenging subjects but not many at this point had topics that took a lot of guts to tackle at this time and not many episodes make the FBI as bad as they do here. Have said many times about having a lot of admiration for how 'Law and Order' and franchise approached the subjects they tackled, back in times where it would have been easy to shy away in fear of offending but that's actually not the case a lot of the time.

Season 7 started off so strongly with the first seven episodes, with "I. D." and "Corruption" being especially good (brilliantly actually), so it was a shame that the previous episode "Family Business" was its first disappointment. "Entrapment" disappointed for me too. It is far from a terrible episodes, none of 'Law and Order's' episodes were at this stage, but it is like "Family Business". With it being a case of a good first half and an underwhelming second.

There are plenty of good things here. The photography while very close up doesn't come over as too static or filmed play-like, while the production values are typically solid and have subtle atmosphere while not being drab and keeping things simple. When the music is used it is haunting and has a melancholic edge that is not overdone. The episode is sympathetically yet uncompromisingly directed.

As indicated above, "Entrapment" starts off well. The policing intrigues and the rapport between Briscoe and Curtis (a lot more settled than it was in Season 6) is snappy with Briscoe's one-liners amusing. The interaction in the legal scenes provokes thought too and the whole entrapment thing does have some tension. The performances are strong in lead and supporting, then again one doesn't expect anything less from the regulars and Michelle Hurd is a standout.

Did feel however that "Entrapment" doesn't fare as well in the second half. Although the truth was not surprising at first, the more that is revealed it did for me get on the over-complicated side to the point of being confusingly muddled, including a major goof regarding a witness that was not easy to swallow.

While there are moments of tension, "Entrapment" actually could have done more with the subject matter and not being as careful, even when the truth becomes, or intends to be, intense the tension could have been more. Don't know why it didn't, 'Law and Order' have dealt with far more difficult topics and didn't hold back doing so. Also didn't find many of the supporting characters that interesting and it went too far on making the FBI look bad, they are far from immune from mistakes but portraying them as incompetent is not going to bode well with some.

In conclusion, uneven with good points and not so good. 6/10.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
In the strictest sense of the word
bkoganbing8 February 2015
Back in the day when Law And Order prime had a whole different set of regulars except for Steven Hill one of the episodes involved the assassination of the head of African American Congress. Now Adam Schiff has been handed a case. Now the guy who succeeded the assassinated predecessor has been shot and wounded and a bodyguard killed. The number one suspect is the son of the predecessor.

The suspect Chris McKinney has delved heavily into some radical politics courtesy of his girlfriend Michelle Hurd. But what he doesn't know about her and neither does Sam Waterston is that she's a professional informant for the FBI. And in saying informant I mean in the strictest sense of the word, she's making good money at it.

A murder has been committed and Waterston does what he has to do to see it through. But his ideas of justice don't coincide with Ron Jones the intended victim who was wounded. In fact the deeper the DA's office digs the odor becomes more and more intense. Mostly from Michelle Hurd's direction.

Everybody looks bad here.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What is "entrapment" anyway?
rmax30482316 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Roland Books, a leader of the African-American community is shot, his bodyguard murdered, after an argument with some white union leaders in a restaurant. But it's not the white guys who did it. After a bit of poking around the detectives focus their attention on Huey Tate, the son of the previous holder of Books' office. There is a prevalent belief that Books had Tate's father assassinated and now there is a possibility that the son has tried to take revenge.

Enter Angela Roney, a young lady who hooked up with Huey Tate a month or so before the current shooting. She brings along a copy of a taped phone call with Huey, in which he threatens to kill Books. It's looking bad for Huey about now.

The problem, which I won't dive too deeply into, is that Angela Roney is in the FBI's witness protection program and the FBI doesn't want to get involved because one of their agents put his big fat foot into the arrangement.

It rather takes some guts to make a program like this, in which the Federal Bureau of Investigation has made an error in judgment or procedures. There was a series in the 1970s, "The FBI," starring Efram Zimbalist, Jr., that was everything "Law and Order" is not. In "The FBI," we are subject to a paean to the bureau and the only errors are made by the bad guys who finally are shot to death or wind up behind bars. Here, the FBI, like the NYPD, are treated as fallible organizations made up of human beings who trip over themselves from time to time.

Roney appears to have urged Huey Tate to shoot Books, but "entrapment" isn't really the issue behind this story, nor is it illuminated much in any way. The shooting turns out to have been not an act of family revenge but one of spite.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
warning spoiler
sensei-4534828 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
In this episode towards the end Mcoy is talking with one of the FBI agents,and the agent mentions that in the past there was a warning that the world trade center was going to get bombed and six months later it was. "Now this episode was aired 01/08/1997 and the the world trade center was actually attacked 09/11/2001" Coincidence???????? min 40:50 You can tell me that I am reading to much into this, but I do not think so. I enjoy watching this program It keeps my mind occupied and then something like this comes along and makes you think a little bit, Sometimes things that do not make any sense make you think a bit harder and evaluate that something a little more!
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed