That was easily the worst thing the D. A. office has done. Now I have zero law experience but couldn't they have argued that the witness was exculpatory evidence since the defense had the chance to cross examine and could have put a hole in their account? It's a stretch because it's not explicitly evidence of innocence but it's something. Sad episode all around. I don't really like Jimmy and he should've revealed the husband's threat. He's such a moron sometimes..
2 Reviews
Stupid Human Tricks
Hitchcoc1 July 2022
Jimmy has a gambling problem. He is in debt to his bookie for 27,000 dollars. He agrees to take a settlement case for dispersal of lottery winnings. The main case is a young guy accused of shooting a store clerk and running away. The case rests on an eye witness, an older woman. The prosecution ends up in an unexpected positive position but doesn't play fair, though it is done legally.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews