Obvious , like the first part, a manifesto for tolerance. Nice, dramatic, not the best dialogue or acting, interesting for fair effort of Jack Wielar and John P Coulter and for the generous end.
The main problem , for me, about both parts remains the not most inspired manner to serve the noble purpoise. It is too melodramatic and it reminds like slice of soap opera.
Good intentioned, it can be seen as an ad usum delphini short film , the speeach of teacher being the main good part of a film looking for fair tone.
But, sure, it is a good intentioned project, seductive for effort to reflect, in form of a parable, the values of acceptance of other and tolerance, attitude of parents, the stigma of relatives and reconciliation.
The main problem , for me, about both parts remains the not most inspired manner to serve the noble purpoise. It is too melodramatic and it reminds like slice of soap opera.
Good intentioned, it can be seen as an ad usum delphini short film , the speeach of teacher being the main good part of a film looking for fair tone.
But, sure, it is a good intentioned project, seductive for effort to reflect, in form of a parable, the values of acceptance of other and tolerance, attitude of parents, the stigma of relatives and reconciliation.