I decided to watch this movie to see how the movie is and why it won the Best Feature Film and Best Cinematography at the Vienna Independent Film Festival and Best Feature Film at the Winchester Film Festival.
The movie starts off with a scene between two lovers, which is a contrast to what you think the movie will be about. Especially, after reading the introduction on screen that talks about the collapse of the Soviet Union and the attempts to regain power before losing power once more.
This movie is not a war movie or necessarily a historic movie. As the movie goes on, you realize that the Soviet Union collapse is just the background for this movie and instead it depicts some dramatic events with the characters in Crimea. Side note, but interestingly enough, Crimea is a hot topic as of late with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The script touches upon political events only in passing references and conversations about unfulfilled expectations and dreams.
In my opinion, the story itself is pretty strong but the movie could have been done better. There were too many long scenes between Vlad and Vyacheslav Zholobov and there was even a long scene of Vlad pretending to talk to his uncle that felt a little too dragged.
The characters talk a lot and with a large number of quotations and postmodern references.
It's clear what the Prudkins are trying to create with this film and end it with a tragic ending that really highlights the consequences of political and social change at a turning point in Russian history.
From a cinematography point of view, I really enjoyed this movie. It depicted that era very well and showed beautiful scenes of Crimea as well. The colors were visually pleasing and even though it's not a big-budget film, the cinematography was still a joy to watch. The production on the movie was great as well.
The movie is mostly about how Natalya Vdovina, a famous actor in the movie, cheats on the General of the secret service with both a beach boy and with the general's nephew. The story unfolds in the Crimea, annexed today by Russia from Ukraine, where the actress comes for a holiday.
Surprisingly the movie took a dark turn in the end when the general went on a killing spree killing both the lifeguard and his nephew who both cheated on him with his wife. What's even worse is he severed his nephew's head and put it on a platter just like he referenced earlier in the movie in a scene he watched.
It was sad to see at the end that he had a meltdown on the beach and ended up killing the lifeguard and then proceeded to pretty much kill himself by drowning. I think he felt like he lost his wife, his nephew, and the country and had nothing else to live for.
At the end of the film newsreel footage presents a clear picture of what the general predicted and what was inevitable at the time. The collapse of the Soviet Union happened.
Overall, despite being interested in the events of back then, the movie didn't draw me as much as I thought it would. Some scenes felt too long, the storyline dragged, and some characters spoke a lot. I don't think this is a required viewing or really an important story to tell for the time period. Do not go into the movie thinking it'll depict true events or be a historical remake because it isn't and there isn't any war or coup scenes. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion based off what I watched. What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. The older male lead had an intense part in the movie and nailed his acting. Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily-accurate movie. Heads up that the movie does dwell on some sex scenes which can be not age appropriate to some. The movie has themes of sex, cheating, betrayal, and death. I'd give it a 7 out of 10 rating overall just because of the balance of it being too long with the acting and the script being great.
The movie starts off with a scene between two lovers, which is a contrast to what you think the movie will be about. Especially, after reading the introduction on screen that talks about the collapse of the Soviet Union and the attempts to regain power before losing power once more.
This movie is not a war movie or necessarily a historic movie. As the movie goes on, you realize that the Soviet Union collapse is just the background for this movie and instead it depicts some dramatic events with the characters in Crimea. Side note, but interestingly enough, Crimea is a hot topic as of late with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The script touches upon political events only in passing references and conversations about unfulfilled expectations and dreams.
In my opinion, the story itself is pretty strong but the movie could have been done better. There were too many long scenes between Vlad and Vyacheslav Zholobov and there was even a long scene of Vlad pretending to talk to his uncle that felt a little too dragged.
The characters talk a lot and with a large number of quotations and postmodern references.
It's clear what the Prudkins are trying to create with this film and end it with a tragic ending that really highlights the consequences of political and social change at a turning point in Russian history.
From a cinematography point of view, I really enjoyed this movie. It depicted that era very well and showed beautiful scenes of Crimea as well. The colors were visually pleasing and even though it's not a big-budget film, the cinematography was still a joy to watch. The production on the movie was great as well.
The movie is mostly about how Natalya Vdovina, a famous actor in the movie, cheats on the General of the secret service with both a beach boy and with the general's nephew. The story unfolds in the Crimea, annexed today by Russia from Ukraine, where the actress comes for a holiday.
Surprisingly the movie took a dark turn in the end when the general went on a killing spree killing both the lifeguard and his nephew who both cheated on him with his wife. What's even worse is he severed his nephew's head and put it on a platter just like he referenced earlier in the movie in a scene he watched.
It was sad to see at the end that he had a meltdown on the beach and ended up killing the lifeguard and then proceeded to pretty much kill himself by drowning. I think he felt like he lost his wife, his nephew, and the country and had nothing else to live for.
At the end of the film newsreel footage presents a clear picture of what the general predicted and what was inevitable at the time. The collapse of the Soviet Union happened.
Overall, despite being interested in the events of back then, the movie didn't draw me as much as I thought it would. Some scenes felt too long, the storyline dragged, and some characters spoke a lot. I don't think this is a required viewing or really an important story to tell for the time period. Do not go into the movie thinking it'll depict true events or be a historical remake because it isn't and there isn't any war or coup scenes. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion based off what I watched. What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. The older male lead had an intense part in the movie and nailed his acting. Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily-accurate movie. Heads up that the movie does dwell on some sex scenes which can be not age appropriate to some. The movie has themes of sex, cheating, betrayal, and death. I'd give it a 7 out of 10 rating overall just because of the balance of it being too long with the acting and the script being great.