This movie takes place at a time that was difficult for the Soviet Union. The main character is the wife of a high official and she seems to have been a lost soul. She is cheating on him and her lovers try to get revenge with her husband. There's a lot of sexuall activity in this movie. In the beginning there is a narrative about the time frame that the events are happening and then there is the the opening scene. The opening scene was an attention grabber. It caught my eye and I was ready to see what was next, but then it slowed down a bit. While it isn't the most exciting movie it has some interesting parts here and there. I was almost expecting something a little more educational but that was not the case. After the initial scene, it was slow, but then every now and then you'd get something to perk you up, some of the violent and torture scenes. I admit a lot of the dialogue was hard to follow at first, but the pieces started slowly coming together. Since it was in another language, I had to keep going back to catch some parts that I'd miss but that was not a deal breaker because of closed caption. The ending kind of made me think but I will watch it one more time to see if I can get more out of it the second time around. Overall, the movie was okay. You have to pay attention to really understand what is going on and when you do, it easier to see why things happen the way that they do.
54 Reviews
A good movie that goes on too long
dtoler-5720126 October 2022
No-One is a smart indie film with some beautiful cinematography. It's obvious that the filmmakers put a lot of effort into making it look not just good, but authentic. The period costumes and cars have a genuine late-Soviet look.
Unfortunately, much of this effort is wasted on long, lingering shots that do nothing to move the story forward. At one point, the camera stayed on a cluster of rocks for so long that I skipped forward 10 seconds and didn't feel like I was missing anything. The ending montage also seemed to be shoehorning in a political message that, while I agreed with it, was really only subtextual in the script, which focused mostly on the romantic and family conflict between the main characters.
What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. I don't remember the name of the older male lead, but his performance was particularly impressive. I'm talking Gary Oldman levels of intensity.
If you want a fast-moving plot, give this movie a pass. But if you love a slow burn, you'll probably love No-One.
Unfortunately, much of this effort is wasted on long, lingering shots that do nothing to move the story forward. At one point, the camera stayed on a cluster of rocks for so long that I skipped forward 10 seconds and didn't feel like I was missing anything. The ending montage also seemed to be shoehorning in a political message that, while I agreed with it, was really only subtextual in the script, which focused mostly on the romantic and family conflict between the main characters.
What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. I don't remember the name of the older male lead, but his performance was particularly impressive. I'm talking Gary Oldman levels of intensity.
If you want a fast-moving plot, give this movie a pass. But if you love a slow burn, you'll probably love No-One.
A Soviet-Era film that excels in its Cinematography
DanielM_010115 November 2022
No-One is a film that takes place against the backdrop of the 'August' coup in the early days of the fall of the Soviet Union. An independent film that delivers a style of art-house noir it builds tension with its description of sex, deception, and emotion. The acting is realistic and is on par with some of the A-Listers in Hollywood. The lead (Uncle) is the glue that holds the film together and while the supporting cast does a great job of being believable no one ever truly stands out such as him. The film does contain a lot of nudity and suggestive scenes but for an independent art house direction, it never comes off as distasteful and helps drive the plot and development of characters.
My biggest complaint would be the pacing of the film. It moves so slowly at times that it can be hard to hold the attention of the audience. While there are some moments that make you go 'oh wow' they are easily predictable and quickly forgotten by the next scene. What the film lacks it makes up for in its Cinematography. Honestly, the Cinematography is some of the best I have ever seen and at times you may think it was shot by Wes Anderson. Perfectly balanced colors and hues give way to dark and gritty textures that are perfectly blended for scenes that are meant to deliver tension. The set pieces of reminiscent of the early 90s but never go overboard and the locations are beautifully shot.
If you like Cold War-era films that focus solely on the drama without the action of a spy thriller or just love to study/experience beautifully shot Cinematography then No-One is a film you should definitely check out.
My biggest complaint would be the pacing of the film. It moves so slowly at times that it can be hard to hold the attention of the audience. While there are some moments that make you go 'oh wow' they are easily predictable and quickly forgotten by the next scene. What the film lacks it makes up for in its Cinematography. Honestly, the Cinematography is some of the best I have ever seen and at times you may think it was shot by Wes Anderson. Perfectly balanced colors and hues give way to dark and gritty textures that are perfectly blended for scenes that are meant to deliver tension. The set pieces of reminiscent of the early 90s but never go overboard and the locations are beautifully shot.
If you like Cold War-era films that focus solely on the drama without the action of a spy thriller or just love to study/experience beautifully shot Cinematography then No-One is a film you should definitely check out.
Very interesting movie
wissammelhem-034991 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I decided to watch this movie to see how the movie is and why it won the Best Feature Film and Best Cinematography at the Vienna Independent Film Festival and Best Feature Film at the Winchester Film Festival.
The movie starts off with a scene between two lovers, which is a contrast to what you think the movie will be about. Especially, after reading the introduction on screen that talks about the collapse of the Soviet Union and the attempts to regain power before losing power once more.
This movie is not a war movie or necessarily a historic movie. As the movie goes on, you realize that the Soviet Union collapse is just the background for this movie and instead it depicts some dramatic events with the characters in Crimea. Side note, but interestingly enough, Crimea is a hot topic as of late with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The script touches upon political events only in passing references and conversations about unfulfilled expectations and dreams.
In my opinion, the story itself is pretty strong but the movie could have been done better. There were too many long scenes between Vlad and Vyacheslav Zholobov and there was even a long scene of Vlad pretending to talk to his uncle that felt a little too dragged.
The characters talk a lot and with a large number of quotations and postmodern references.
It's clear what the Prudkins are trying to create with this film and end it with a tragic ending that really highlights the consequences of political and social change at a turning point in Russian history.
From a cinematography point of view, I really enjoyed this movie. It depicted that era very well and showed beautiful scenes of Crimea as well. The colors were visually pleasing and even though it's not a big-budget film, the cinematography was still a joy to watch. The production on the movie was great as well.
The movie is mostly about how Natalya Vdovina, a famous actor in the movie, cheats on the General of the secret service with both a beach boy and with the general's nephew. The story unfolds in the Crimea, annexed today by Russia from Ukraine, where the actress comes for a holiday.
Surprisingly the movie took a dark turn in the end when the general went on a killing spree killing both the lifeguard and his nephew who both cheated on him with his wife. What's even worse is he severed his nephew's head and put it on a platter just like he referenced earlier in the movie in a scene he watched.
It was sad to see at the end that he had a meltdown on the beach and ended up killing the lifeguard and then proceeded to pretty much kill himself by drowning. I think he felt like he lost his wife, his nephew, and the country and had nothing else to live for.
At the end of the film newsreel footage presents a clear picture of what the general predicted and what was inevitable at the time. The collapse of the Soviet Union happened.
Overall, despite being interested in the events of back then, the movie didn't draw me as much as I thought it would. Some scenes felt too long, the storyline dragged, and some characters spoke a lot. I don't think this is a required viewing or really an important story to tell for the time period. Do not go into the movie thinking it'll depict true events or be a historical remake because it isn't and there isn't any war or coup scenes. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion based off what I watched. What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. The older male lead had an intense part in the movie and nailed his acting. Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily-accurate movie. Heads up that the movie does dwell on some sex scenes which can be not age appropriate to some. The movie has themes of sex, cheating, betrayal, and death. I'd give it a 7 out of 10 rating overall just because of the balance of it being too long with the acting and the script being great.
The movie starts off with a scene between two lovers, which is a contrast to what you think the movie will be about. Especially, after reading the introduction on screen that talks about the collapse of the Soviet Union and the attempts to regain power before losing power once more.
This movie is not a war movie or necessarily a historic movie. As the movie goes on, you realize that the Soviet Union collapse is just the background for this movie and instead it depicts some dramatic events with the characters in Crimea. Side note, but interestingly enough, Crimea is a hot topic as of late with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The script touches upon political events only in passing references and conversations about unfulfilled expectations and dreams.
In my opinion, the story itself is pretty strong but the movie could have been done better. There were too many long scenes between Vlad and Vyacheslav Zholobov and there was even a long scene of Vlad pretending to talk to his uncle that felt a little too dragged.
The characters talk a lot and with a large number of quotations and postmodern references.
It's clear what the Prudkins are trying to create with this film and end it with a tragic ending that really highlights the consequences of political and social change at a turning point in Russian history.
From a cinematography point of view, I really enjoyed this movie. It depicted that era very well and showed beautiful scenes of Crimea as well. The colors were visually pleasing and even though it's not a big-budget film, the cinematography was still a joy to watch. The production on the movie was great as well.
The movie is mostly about how Natalya Vdovina, a famous actor in the movie, cheats on the General of the secret service with both a beach boy and with the general's nephew. The story unfolds in the Crimea, annexed today by Russia from Ukraine, where the actress comes for a holiday.
Surprisingly the movie took a dark turn in the end when the general went on a killing spree killing both the lifeguard and his nephew who both cheated on him with his wife. What's even worse is he severed his nephew's head and put it on a platter just like he referenced earlier in the movie in a scene he watched.
It was sad to see at the end that he had a meltdown on the beach and ended up killing the lifeguard and then proceeded to pretty much kill himself by drowning. I think he felt like he lost his wife, his nephew, and the country and had nothing else to live for.
At the end of the film newsreel footage presents a clear picture of what the general predicted and what was inevitable at the time. The collapse of the Soviet Union happened.
Overall, despite being interested in the events of back then, the movie didn't draw me as much as I thought it would. Some scenes felt too long, the storyline dragged, and some characters spoke a lot. I don't think this is a required viewing or really an important story to tell for the time period. Do not go into the movie thinking it'll depict true events or be a historical remake because it isn't and there isn't any war or coup scenes. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion based off what I watched. What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. The older male lead had an intense part in the movie and nailed his acting. Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily-accurate movie. Heads up that the movie does dwell on some sex scenes which can be not age appropriate to some. The movie has themes of sex, cheating, betrayal, and death. I'd give it a 7 out of 10 rating overall just because of the balance of it being too long with the acting and the script being great.
Not what I thought it'd be..
kwb-3965526 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I was really intrigued by this film because of the title and description. The blurb about "Soviet political collapse" and all that made me think it really would be based on something to do with that or that the main story would be about the political collapse. In a sense it was but it was more about relationship issues. I think it was supposed to be metaphors about governments but I just didn't get that out of this storyline. They spent very little time on that. The main story was the marital issues and taking care of her 'lovers'. But the characters showed barely any emotions. None during intimacy, killing, political chats, etc. Most of the time they were straight-faced, with a few very unreal laughs. I would have enjoyed some more realness to make you feel what they're feeling, to really get involved with the story.
Overall, it was slow going - getting to the point or purpose. For almost 2 hours long you just sort of wondered what was going on. Starting with a poor nudity scene just didn't get me excited. It had a lot of nudity with no emotions, as well. I mean these people are doing the acts (multiple times) and literally no facial expressions during the acts. Doesn't seem to be enjoyable for them so how is a viewer supposed to not feel awkward and uncomfortable watching that. It really was unnecessary for most of it and didn't add value to the story besides knowing the wife was cheating.
The only part I didn't mind was reading the subtitles and the outside views. It just didn't draw me in and keep me entertained the whole time.
Overall, it was slow going - getting to the point or purpose. For almost 2 hours long you just sort of wondered what was going on. Starting with a poor nudity scene just didn't get me excited. It had a lot of nudity with no emotions, as well. I mean these people are doing the acts (multiple times) and literally no facial expressions during the acts. Doesn't seem to be enjoyable for them so how is a viewer supposed to not feel awkward and uncomfortable watching that. It really was unnecessary for most of it and didn't add value to the story besides knowing the wife was cheating.
The only part I didn't mind was reading the subtitles and the outside views. It just didn't draw me in and keep me entertained the whole time.
Not What I Expected
Mark_V11413 December 2022
No-One is an art house movie that does a lot of telling versus showing. The tone is set by the long opening narration that could be done with a series of photos and actual footage over the opening credits instead. I wanted to like the movie, but I just couldn't find anyone to root for. Ultimately, I never connected with anyone and couldn't tell if there was supposed to be a main character. At times, the cinematography was visually impactful, but it was inconsistent due to editing.
There were plenty of soliloquies while the actors stared into the camera to simulate experiencing a play. That added a little character to the film, but the dialogue wasn't compelling enough for me to enjoy the trick.
For the characters, there was a lack of growth; no arcs. Everyone does what was expected of them based on their introductions in the movie. The sleazy guy stays sleazy up through the end. The cheater cheats, the spy spies, the killer kills. There is a severe lack of emotion throughout that seems to be on purpose. Unfortunately, it backfires in the viewer not making any connections to the characters. And when the lack of emotion comes to a breaking point, the outbursts seem melodramatic by comparison.
There were plenty of soliloquies while the actors stared into the camera to simulate experiencing a play. That added a little character to the film, but the dialogue wasn't compelling enough for me to enjoy the trick.
For the characters, there was a lack of growth; no arcs. Everyone does what was expected of them based on their introductions in the movie. The sleazy guy stays sleazy up through the end. The cheater cheats, the spy spies, the killer kills. There is a severe lack of emotion throughout that seems to be on purpose. Unfortunately, it backfires in the viewer not making any connections to the characters. And when the lack of emotion comes to a breaking point, the outbursts seem melodramatic by comparison.
Alright Indie Film About the Collapse of the Soviet Union
ashlynwoodpublications29 October 2022
NO-ONE by Lev Prudkin and Vladimir Prudkin stirred up mixed feelings in me when I watched it. First, a warning, if you are uncomfortable with the topics of sexual themes and incest, you should steer clear of the film. Now that we have the warning out of the way, while I did not dislike the film, it was kind of mediocre. It has an extremely slow-moving plot, with long-drawn-out conversations, with the very first one taking close to ten minutes.
On top of that, I did not necessarily care very much for the themes of incest between the two main characters. It made it very difficult for me to understand the film's message fully, but other than the long-drawn-out conversations and incest themes, it was well-created. The camera work is reminiscent of Steven Spielberg, and the soundtrack was fun to listen to. I do think more music could have been implemented to help fill in some of the quiet moments.
Instead of really focusing heavily on the fall of the Soviet Union, though, it focuses a lot more on the affair between two of the main characters. While not necessarily a negative aspect of the film, it would have been great to see the film focus more on the actual events of the collapse rather than just the affair.
Overall though, I give the film a 5/10. It was neither a terrible film that I would not recommend to anyone nor was it really that noteworthy. Part of it is probably the fact that I have never really researched much about the time period in the film, but regardless of that, it can still be an enjoyable film if you enjoy slow-burn dramas.
On top of that, I did not necessarily care very much for the themes of incest between the two main characters. It made it very difficult for me to understand the film's message fully, but other than the long-drawn-out conversations and incest themes, it was well-created. The camera work is reminiscent of Steven Spielberg, and the soundtrack was fun to listen to. I do think more music could have been implemented to help fill in some of the quiet moments.
Instead of really focusing heavily on the fall of the Soviet Union, though, it focuses a lot more on the affair between two of the main characters. While not necessarily a negative aspect of the film, it would have been great to see the film focus more on the actual events of the collapse rather than just the affair.
Overall though, I give the film a 5/10. It was neither a terrible film that I would not recommend to anyone nor was it really that noteworthy. Part of it is probably the fact that I have never really researched much about the time period in the film, but regardless of that, it can still be an enjoyable film if you enjoy slow-burn dramas.
An intricate perspective at the times of change
klennykh17 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This film is an intricate view at one of the most significant political and social shifts in history through the prism of human relationships.
The shift of a paradigm of a whole cultural layer, results in a distortion of human behavior and its expression in interactions and relationships.
An intelligence general turns to a mind boggling form of art, in his understanding.
A silver-spoon film director attempting to quench his significance through surreptitious mischief
A prominent actress seeking for her expression through unreasonable adultery
And all this occurring away from the stage of events of the political coup attempt of 1991.
And although we don't see what is happening on the streets of Moscow, through the amazing and expressive performance, we feel the tension and the absurdity of the events with a flavor of inevitability of change.
Human interactions portrays the imminence of collapse of the "old ways" with an experience of absolute uncertainty and, even, desperation towards the future. Yet there is an aroma of faith, that even this shall pass...
The shift of a paradigm of a whole cultural layer, results in a distortion of human behavior and its expression in interactions and relationships.
An intelligence general turns to a mind boggling form of art, in his understanding.
A silver-spoon film director attempting to quench his significance through surreptitious mischief
A prominent actress seeking for her expression through unreasonable adultery
And all this occurring away from the stage of events of the political coup attempt of 1991.
And although we don't see what is happening on the streets of Moscow, through the amazing and expressive performance, we feel the tension and the absurdity of the events with a flavor of inevitability of change.
Human interactions portrays the imminence of collapse of the "old ways" with an experience of absolute uncertainty and, even, desperation towards the future. Yet there is an aroma of faith, that even this shall pass...
Interesting take on the time period.
jteringman24 November 2022
The movie definitely had a little bit of a slow start for me, but it did pick up throughout and it definitely picked up in the end. I actually did not expect the ending that it had, so I enjoyed that part of it quite a bit. Overall, it's a slower movie, but each scene and piece of dialogue seemed to be very deliberate. It was an interesting take on the period of events. I thought it had great cinematography and the acting was well done. It actually felt like this film was created in the 90's, so that really helped me immerse into the movie. It did seem to jump around quite a bit, but it also did a good job of explaining the backstories. As I mentioned previously, it was a little slow for my taste. I realize it wasn't supposed to be a fast-paced movie, but it seemed like it tried to hang in the pauses and the suspense more than it needed to. I don't know that I would come back to this movie again soon, but I did enjoy it.
A Collapse Of An Era and Time
danielle_starr21 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The film starts with an unusual dance between two characters and a film maker that later becomes clearer as the movie unfolds. The dance seems to signify and mirror the emotions and angst that the characters are feeling, whether they verbalize or use body language.
The setting of the movie is a somber and stark with the changing of the old guard in the USSR to the unknown. This is shown by the actors themselves physically. The film shows a contrast between the older characters and the younger and how they view life, love, politics, power and pain. The actions that the characters take lead down some dark paths and personal inflection that the characters themselves are able to see as well as the other characters.
The writing is trying to convey internal chaos and turmoil that the characters are either trying to work through or ignore. However, the acting comes across as flat and emotionless. This may be what the director was going for to try to show the contrast of emotion to what is going on around the characters at the fall of the USSR. This takes away from the storyline with stoic acting that does not bring the characters to life, but rather leaves them in a two dimensional life. This takes away from the story because you want to not just watch, but find a character to identify with, but because of the emotionless acting it is hard.
The plot of the movie is predictable - an older man with a much younger wife that enjoys being in the spotlight and in the company of younger men. The husband knows what is going on and deciding on what actions to take. The younger crowd at the beach trying to enjoy themselves and find their roles in the new world and with each other.
The script is predictable as well you can already envision what and where conversations are going. The lines are delivered with little emotion. The captioning at times is difficult to read because white lettering with a white or light background.
Overall the characters themselves are not likeable, no matter how much one tries. The director uses lots of imagery to give the film not only artistic touches, but also an interpretation of what is going on or foreshadowing without speech. The film is okay, but lacks emotion and the ability to draw the audience in.
The setting of the movie is a somber and stark with the changing of the old guard in the USSR to the unknown. This is shown by the actors themselves physically. The film shows a contrast between the older characters and the younger and how they view life, love, politics, power and pain. The actions that the characters take lead down some dark paths and personal inflection that the characters themselves are able to see as well as the other characters.
The writing is trying to convey internal chaos and turmoil that the characters are either trying to work through or ignore. However, the acting comes across as flat and emotionless. This may be what the director was going for to try to show the contrast of emotion to what is going on around the characters at the fall of the USSR. This takes away from the storyline with stoic acting that does not bring the characters to life, but rather leaves them in a two dimensional life. This takes away from the story because you want to not just watch, but find a character to identify with, but because of the emotionless acting it is hard.
The plot of the movie is predictable - an older man with a much younger wife that enjoys being in the spotlight and in the company of younger men. The husband knows what is going on and deciding on what actions to take. The younger crowd at the beach trying to enjoy themselves and find their roles in the new world and with each other.
The script is predictable as well you can already envision what and where conversations are going. The lines are delivered with little emotion. The captioning at times is difficult to read because white lettering with a white or light background.
Overall the characters themselves are not likeable, no matter how much one tries. The director uses lots of imagery to give the film not only artistic touches, but also an interpretation of what is going on or foreshadowing without speech. The film is okay, but lacks emotion and the ability to draw the audience in.
Somber Metaphors and Haunting Visuals
torimccaffery10 October 2022
This film serves as a metaphor of the political and social climates of the USSR through the lens of interpersonal relationships. As these climates shift, the parallels are felt as we watch the changing dynamics between the main characters and those they interact with. Tamara, the spiritually tortured wife of a KGB General, Vlad her filmmaker nephew, and Zina, Vlad's lover and the daughter of a political figure all dance together to demonstrate the expressions of pain, romance, and power as a medium from which the viewer can unravel the story of the collapsing USSR. The film is stark while also grandiose in its aesthetics through the visual settings and the characters themselves. Juxtaposition and drama make this film impossible to look away from, as you never know what is going to come next. This film provides a lot for the viewers to decipher and is one of the ones you will still be contemplating long after the last frame has ended.
Didn't really understand the point, but beautifully shot!
lekaitom25 November 2022
No-One is an interesting indie film, and very different than most films you will see. To start, the cinematography is beautiful, and the shots are very well shot. The story itself can be a bit confusing at times, I got lost at times balancing the political and social complexities of the film but see how it tied together at the end of the film to illustrate the fall of the Soviet Union. I would argue that the film resembles what is happening today with the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the battle for Crimea. However, I'm not really sure what I was supposed to take away from the film, it appears that it was supposed to illustrate the fall of the Soviet Union, but I feel like I understand more about betrayal and scandals that didn't exactly add tons of value to my knowledge. The film could have touched much more on Russia in my opinion and why the Soviet Union fell instead of focusing so much on the social side.
Slow burn that doesn't burn brightly
seanjameslarsen23 November 2022
No-One provides a painful look at the collapse of the USSR and the meltdown of personal relationships in the midst of it. Long walks with long, boring dialogues give the viewer a challenging task in staying engaged with the movie. While the movie contains lots of foreshadowing (some painfully obvious moments), the viewer is often left wondering, "What is the point of this? Why is this here?" The movie has wonderful music and mostly decent cinematography. There are a few shots and scenes that had me wanting the camera to not awkwardly zoom in. The characters are underdeveloped and one dimensional. I was left wanting more character development or just better characters in general. This was truly a slow burn. Unfortunately, it did not burn brightly.
Intriguing and full of Revenge!
LawS-G28 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The film gives an authentic and rustic feel with a slow start but wonderful ending. As the Soviet Union diminishes the main character's plans, he takes revenge and executes his plan with the help of his former subordinates. The way he planned and carried out his revenge is what really pulled me into the movie. At first, I didn't understand Oleg's motives as it seemed as if he was so defeated by the fall of the empire that nothing mattered, until his plans started to unfold. I thought the movie had a few spontaneous and irrelevant scenes that did not go together. A few scene transitions seemed out of place and confusing. I didn't quite understand if the events were happening in the present or past but after watching it a second time, the scenes helped portray the carefree lifestyles of many during that time and Oleg's motivation. Overall, the movie was intriguing and even though it's not what I prefer watching usually, I think its originality and portrayal of the events worked well for a one of a kind experience.
It's more about Betrayal then war.
brokntears-4888620 November 2022
Im not reqlly one to watch a movie in a different language, but I decided to give it a shot since I had seen that it won multiple awards. It was very professionally filmed. The actors were well-chosen and it was really thought out. You grew to know each character and the roles they played. Most were pretty unlikeable in my opinion. Some of them were also pretty bland, but that might have been the intention of the film and they way it was created.
I did like the way it was filmed, it was very visually appealing. However it seemed very drawn out.
I was able to follow along with the subtitles and not miss any details. The Russian language in the back round made it tough but Eventually, I got the hang of it and was able to follow along easier. You still have to pay close attention though so you do not miss any important parts of the film.
It seemed way more of a romantic drama film, which confused me after reading the synopsis and seeing the first scene having nothing to do with war. It will grab the attention of some people, or make them run depending on the person watching the film.
A scene more war-related would have grabbed my attention assuming what I read from the synopsis. After the first scene, you see two men, and things start to change into discussions of war. There are lots of twists and turns, blackmailing, affairs, and betrayal throughout the film. There were not any battle scenes as I expected in a typical war movie. There was still plenty of drama though. Overall, the main focus of the film was more on the sexual affairs going on rather than the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union collapse was more of what was going on during that period. Some scenes seemed to linger on way too long and were drawn out. The conversations just kept going, which was very hard to keep my attention with their quiet voices. I had to go back a few times and listen again because they had lost my attention and I had no idea what was going on. Eventually, something would happen to reel me back in. There is way too much dialogue and not enough action in my opinion. It gets stale here and there. The conversations are a bit slow and do not have many expressions. Lost my interest multiple times. I think after reading the summary, I had the assumption that there would be more action as with most war movies, but do not be expecting that.
As with any movie, there are positives and negatives. The big negative for me was the lingering, dull conversations and that it was really drawn out. The storyline is very creative, well thought out, and intriguing, but it could have been a little more had the dialogue been more than expressionless. You have to pay attention as you will be reading the subtitles the entire time. Once the General starts to learn all of the ways he is being betrayed by the people around him, as a viewer, I am hoping the whole time that he gets the revenge he should get towards those who did him wrong.
I would recommend it to someone they are looking for a foreign film, to watch and have an interest in drama, love, and a little bit of war. Would definitely say it is worth a watch.
I did like the way it was filmed, it was very visually appealing. However it seemed very drawn out.
I was able to follow along with the subtitles and not miss any details. The Russian language in the back round made it tough but Eventually, I got the hang of it and was able to follow along easier. You still have to pay close attention though so you do not miss any important parts of the film.
It seemed way more of a romantic drama film, which confused me after reading the synopsis and seeing the first scene having nothing to do with war. It will grab the attention of some people, or make them run depending on the person watching the film.
A scene more war-related would have grabbed my attention assuming what I read from the synopsis. After the first scene, you see two men, and things start to change into discussions of war. There are lots of twists and turns, blackmailing, affairs, and betrayal throughout the film. There were not any battle scenes as I expected in a typical war movie. There was still plenty of drama though. Overall, the main focus of the film was more on the sexual affairs going on rather than the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union collapse was more of what was going on during that period. Some scenes seemed to linger on way too long and were drawn out. The conversations just kept going, which was very hard to keep my attention with their quiet voices. I had to go back a few times and listen again because they had lost my attention and I had no idea what was going on. Eventually, something would happen to reel me back in. There is way too much dialogue and not enough action in my opinion. It gets stale here and there. The conversations are a bit slow and do not have many expressions. Lost my interest multiple times. I think after reading the summary, I had the assumption that there would be more action as with most war movies, but do not be expecting that.
As with any movie, there are positives and negatives. The big negative for me was the lingering, dull conversations and that it was really drawn out. The storyline is very creative, well thought out, and intriguing, but it could have been a little more had the dialogue been more than expressionless. You have to pay attention as you will be reading the subtitles the entire time. Once the General starts to learn all of the ways he is being betrayed by the people around him, as a viewer, I am hoping the whole time that he gets the revenge he should get towards those who did him wrong.
I would recommend it to someone they are looking for a foreign film, to watch and have an interest in drama, love, and a little bit of war. Would definitely say it is worth a watch.
Chekhov meets Cabaret
saricaine-9754124 November 2022
This slow thriller written and directed by Vladimir Prudkin and Lev Prudkin reads like a futuristic Cabaret. All the elements for pre WWII Berlin are in place here: the spies, the characters who are constantly performing, the depravity, the helplessness of its participants, shot with an unsympathetic understated metallic reserve.
Taking place on the precipice and then during the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the plot centers around the story of one family, also at war.
"If I lose today, I'll win tomorrow." One of the family members remarks tonelessly playing a game of cards with two women, one his fiance, and the other his Aunt (not by blood) as the world around them collapses.
The crux of the action takes place on the Crimean Peninsula where various members of the family gather in the Chekhovian countryside as the tanks also gather (unseen) on the city streets, one of the most powerful family members remarking in a monotone: "I am incognito."
The cinematography is impeccable, the set design as well, and the acting is strong. Overall the story, couched in metaphor, is almost too understated to be fully satisfying but it builds towards its final destination.
Taking place on the precipice and then during the collapse of the USSR in 1991, the plot centers around the story of one family, also at war.
"If I lose today, I'll win tomorrow." One of the family members remarks tonelessly playing a game of cards with two women, one his fiance, and the other his Aunt (not by blood) as the world around them collapses.
The crux of the action takes place on the Crimean Peninsula where various members of the family gather in the Chekhovian countryside as the tanks also gather (unseen) on the city streets, one of the most powerful family members remarking in a monotone: "I am incognito."
The cinematography is impeccable, the set design as well, and the acting is strong. Overall the story, couched in metaphor, is almost too understated to be fully satisfying but it builds towards its final destination.
Not a bad foreign indie flick
xtrrmin816 October 2022
No-One is advertised to be ab out how the fall of the Soviet Union affected people in that region. It has the stile of an artistic indie movie, with some gratuitous nudity and mild sex scenes that are pretty normal for the genre. If English is your only language and reading subtitles annoys you, then this isn't the movie for you.
There's a lot of drama and intrigue.
If I'm being honest, much of the movie focuses primarily on affairs, not the political coup, which makes the coup and the collapse of the Soviet Union seem more like a trivial subplot than it was advertised to be. But given the fact that the trailer for the movie on YouTube really told me nothing in terms of what the movie was about, I really had no idea what to expect from it.
Parts of it are slow and draggy, but that can happen even with some of the more top-rated movies. There's a LOT of dialog and very little action, which is odd when you consider that the collapse of the Soviet Union is the backdrop of this movie.
The little bit of action that does occur is completely predictable. And one prop in particular was ridiculously low-budget (watch til the end and you'll know which one. It has old school Evil Dead vibes without the comedy.), which sort of adds to the campiness of this movie.
Overall, it's alright for a foreign indie film. It wasn't as bad as I expected it to be. It could have been a lot better, but it's definitely not the worst indie film I've seen.
There's a lot of drama and intrigue.
If I'm being honest, much of the movie focuses primarily on affairs, not the political coup, which makes the coup and the collapse of the Soviet Union seem more like a trivial subplot than it was advertised to be. But given the fact that the trailer for the movie on YouTube really told me nothing in terms of what the movie was about, I really had no idea what to expect from it.
Parts of it are slow and draggy, but that can happen even with some of the more top-rated movies. There's a LOT of dialog and very little action, which is odd when you consider that the collapse of the Soviet Union is the backdrop of this movie.
The little bit of action that does occur is completely predictable. And one prop in particular was ridiculously low-budget (watch til the end and you'll know which one. It has old school Evil Dead vibes without the comedy.), which sort of adds to the campiness of this movie.
Overall, it's alright for a foreign indie film. It wasn't as bad as I expected it to be. It could have been a lot better, but it's definitely not the worst indie film I've seen.
A movie of intrigues
temiaristar27 November 2022
This movie began with two lovers in action, which I believe is contrary to what you think the movie will be about especially after from the title, cover and introduction on screen that talks about the collapse of the Soviet Union and the attempts to regain power before losing power again.
The movie is not a war movie or necessarily a historic movie but the script touches upon political events only in passing references and conversations about unfulfilled expectations and dreams. As you see on, you'll realize that the Soviet Union collapse is just the background for the movie but instead depicts some dramatic events with the characters in Crimea. Coincedentally, Crimea lately, is a hot topic vis-a-vis the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The movie for the most part centered around a certain Natalya Vdovina, who cheated on the General of the secret service with not just a stranger, a beach boy but also with the general's nephew. The story unfolds in Crimea, a city annexed today by Russia from Ukraine, where the actress went for a holiday. Surprisingly, the movie took a dark turn in the end when the general went on a killing spree killing both the lifeguard and his nephew who both cheated on him with his wife. What's even worse is he severed his nephew's head and put it on a platter just like he referenced earlier in the movie in a scene he watched. It was sad to see at the end that he had a meltdown on the beach and ended up killing the lifeguard and then proceeded to pretty much kill himself by drowning. I think he felt like he lost his wife, his nephew, and the country and had nothing else to live for. By the end of the film, newsreel footage presented a clear picture of what the general predicted and what was inevitable at the time: The collapse of the Soviet Union.
Overall, despite being interested in the events of back then, the movie didn't draw me as much as I thought it would. Some scenes felt too long, the storyline dragged on, and some characters spoke a lot. I don't think this is a required viewing or really an important story to tell for the time period. Do not go into the movie thinking it'll depict true events or be a historical remake because it isn't and there isn't any war or coup scenes. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion based off what I watched. What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. The older male lead had an intense part in the movie and nailed his acting. Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily accurate movie. Heads up that the movie does dwell on some sex scenes which can be not age appropriate to some. The movie has themes of sex, cheating, betrayal, and death. I'd give it a 7 out of 10 rating overall just because of the balance of it being too long with the acting and the script being great.
However, I still find the movie interesting. The graphics described the era well and showcased beautiful sites and sights of Crimea as well. The story itself is strong but there were some flaws I observed.. There were many scenes of unnecessary conversations and videoing, especially of Vlad and Vyacheslav Zholobov. A large chunk of those were involved unnecessary convos, character talking for too long a duration incites boredom to the viewer. There were lots of quotations and postmodern references too but as we may know, there isn't a perfect movie. A movie will always have flaws but looking to the upside and overall, I still think it's a good movie.
I decided to watch this movie to see how the movie is and why it won the Best Feature Film and Best Cinematography at the Vienna Independent Film Festival and Best Feature Film at the Winchester Film Festival.
It's clear what the Prudkins were trying to create with this film, and with it ending tragically, highlights the consequences of political and social change at a turning point in Russian history. I see why the movie was able to win the Best Feature Film and Best Cinematography at the Vienna Independent Film Festival and Best Feature Film at the Winchester Film Festival, very well deserved.
Highly Recommended 100%
The movie is not a war movie or necessarily a historic movie but the script touches upon political events only in passing references and conversations about unfulfilled expectations and dreams. As you see on, you'll realize that the Soviet Union collapse is just the background for the movie but instead depicts some dramatic events with the characters in Crimea. Coincedentally, Crimea lately, is a hot topic vis-a-vis the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The movie for the most part centered around a certain Natalya Vdovina, who cheated on the General of the secret service with not just a stranger, a beach boy but also with the general's nephew. The story unfolds in Crimea, a city annexed today by Russia from Ukraine, where the actress went for a holiday. Surprisingly, the movie took a dark turn in the end when the general went on a killing spree killing both the lifeguard and his nephew who both cheated on him with his wife. What's even worse is he severed his nephew's head and put it on a platter just like he referenced earlier in the movie in a scene he watched. It was sad to see at the end that he had a meltdown on the beach and ended up killing the lifeguard and then proceeded to pretty much kill himself by drowning. I think he felt like he lost his wife, his nephew, and the country and had nothing else to live for. By the end of the film, newsreel footage presented a clear picture of what the general predicted and what was inevitable at the time: The collapse of the Soviet Union.
Overall, despite being interested in the events of back then, the movie didn't draw me as much as I thought it would. Some scenes felt too long, the storyline dragged on, and some characters spoke a lot. I don't think this is a required viewing or really an important story to tell for the time period. Do not go into the movie thinking it'll depict true events or be a historical remake because it isn't and there isn't any war or coup scenes. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion based off what I watched. What saves this movie is the strong acting and the well-written script. The older male lead had an intense part in the movie and nailed his acting. Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily accurate movie. Heads up that the movie does dwell on some sex scenes which can be not age appropriate to some. The movie has themes of sex, cheating, betrayal, and death. I'd give it a 7 out of 10 rating overall just because of the balance of it being too long with the acting and the script being great.
However, I still find the movie interesting. The graphics described the era well and showcased beautiful sites and sights of Crimea as well. The story itself is strong but there were some flaws I observed.. There were many scenes of unnecessary conversations and videoing, especially of Vlad and Vyacheslav Zholobov. A large chunk of those were involved unnecessary convos, character talking for too long a duration incites boredom to the viewer. There were lots of quotations and postmodern references too but as we may know, there isn't a perfect movie. A movie will always have flaws but looking to the upside and overall, I still think it's a good movie.
I decided to watch this movie to see how the movie is and why it won the Best Feature Film and Best Cinematography at the Vienna Independent Film Festival and Best Feature Film at the Winchester Film Festival.
It's clear what the Prudkins were trying to create with this film, and with it ending tragically, highlights the consequences of political and social change at a turning point in Russian history. I see why the movie was able to win the Best Feature Film and Best Cinematography at the Vienna Independent Film Festival and Best Feature Film at the Winchester Film Festival, very well deserved.
Highly Recommended 100%
A Very Interesting Watch For Me
mdawnthomas23 November 2022
Being someone who is American and was pretty unfamiliar with this subject matter, I was pleasantly surprised when I watched this film. It was suggested to me by a friend who knows that I love history, but this had a much different touch to it. I love a good indie film and this would be right up there with the caliber of movies that I watch. So let's dive in!
Taking place in the USSR, this movie showcases the political and social climate at the time. One of the main characters, Tamara is the wife of a KGB general and much of the storyline is focused on her. She has a nephew, named Vlad, who is a filmmaker, who is also featured here. Lastly, we have Zina, who is Vlad's lover and a daughter of a high-powered political figure. The movie helps to capture the fall of Soviet Russia during a time when things seemed bleak for them all.
The conflict, tension, and even sex in this movie are all a metaphor for the USSR and had it fell so quickly. The movie was shot incredibly well and I am glad that I took the time to watch it and learn even more about that period in history.
Taking place in the USSR, this movie showcases the political and social climate at the time. One of the main characters, Tamara is the wife of a KGB general and much of the storyline is focused on her. She has a nephew, named Vlad, who is a filmmaker, who is also featured here. Lastly, we have Zina, who is Vlad's lover and a daughter of a high-powered political figure. The movie helps to capture the fall of Soviet Russia during a time when things seemed bleak for them all.
The conflict, tension, and even sex in this movie are all a metaphor for the USSR and had it fell so quickly. The movie was shot incredibly well and I am glad that I took the time to watch it and learn even more about that period in history.
Decent Indie Film
melanieoneill-0155716 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The film has an artistic edge to it that make it aesthetically pleasing to watch. The cinematography is beautiful and has a vintage feel to it.
The storyline mostly focuses on the relationships of four main characters, the KGB general, his wife Tamara, Vlad, and Vlad's lover, Zina. The final days before the collapse of the Soviet Union help sets the tone for the movie, but the film focuses more on the interpersonal relationships of these four people and the affair that Vlad is having with the KGB General's wife, Tamara. Tamara has quite a few affairs with various men throughout the film and it does have heavy sex scenes included in the film. I thought the synopsis was a little misleading due to this as I expected it to be a little more direct and focused on the political and historical story line.
The film does move quite slow, but that could be intriguing for some viewers. As Oleg learns of the ways he's being betrayed, which was foreshadowed in the beginning of the film, the viewer is left with anticipation in what he will do to 'right the wrongs' done to him. I did feel a little bad for Zina, as she seemed to be a side character that ended up getting hurt later in the film by Vlad and his actions.
Overall, the film was good and by the end of it, I liked it but it took some time to get into and really understand. This is not the typical film style I aim to watch, but recommend for anyone looking to step outside of their comfort zone and experience something different!
The storyline mostly focuses on the relationships of four main characters, the KGB general, his wife Tamara, Vlad, and Vlad's lover, Zina. The final days before the collapse of the Soviet Union help sets the tone for the movie, but the film focuses more on the interpersonal relationships of these four people and the affair that Vlad is having with the KGB General's wife, Tamara. Tamara has quite a few affairs with various men throughout the film and it does have heavy sex scenes included in the film. I thought the synopsis was a little misleading due to this as I expected it to be a little more direct and focused on the political and historical story line.
The film does move quite slow, but that could be intriguing for some viewers. As Oleg learns of the ways he's being betrayed, which was foreshadowed in the beginning of the film, the viewer is left with anticipation in what he will do to 'right the wrongs' done to him. I did feel a little bad for Zina, as she seemed to be a side character that ended up getting hurt later in the film by Vlad and his actions.
Overall, the film was good and by the end of it, I liked it but it took some time to get into and really understand. This is not the typical film style I aim to watch, but recommend for anyone looking to step outside of their comfort zone and experience something different!
Not what I expected, but worth the watch
hforester-4188217 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I'll start with saying that I did not read the description of the movie before throwing myself head first into this movie. The layout of the beginning had me convinced that it would be an actual war movie with battles or something, even though it said in the beginning it was meant to be.
This is an extremely twisted drama and it threw me a LOT. First of all, it seems that all of the characters hate each other for their own various reasons, it is touched on a little bit why they hate each other but it does get confusing and I was lost a bit.
Although confusing it is worth the watch! There are a few twist and turns that will keep you on your toes. When Oleg goes on his murdering spree he had me convinced a few times that he had simply just gone crazy with rage but his killings and words were planned out and meticulous.
This is an extremely twisted drama and it threw me a LOT. First of all, it seems that all of the characters hate each other for their own various reasons, it is touched on a little bit why they hate each other but it does get confusing and I was lost a bit.
Although confusing it is worth the watch! There are a few twist and turns that will keep you on your toes. When Oleg goes on his murdering spree he had me convinced a few times that he had simply just gone crazy with rage but his killings and words were planned out and meticulous.
Great movie for fans of Shakespearean adaptations
pbennett-5682717 November 2022
This movie is a modern adaptation of Shakespeare's work Othello framed amidst the downfall of the Soviet Union. The beginning of the film was hard to get into as it seemed slow and overdramatic. There are many monologues in this film which makes sense as an adaptation of a play but still they leave me waiting for the long scenes to move on.
As with other Shakespearean adaptions, there are many times where you can feel the struggle of transforming a play into a movie. The story picked up the pace about a third of the way through and I found myself laughing and holding my breath in anticipation during certain scenes. The wife is a compelling character and by the end of the movie I wondered if she was intended to be a metaphor for Russia. The husband's speech to his nephew towards the end about the wonderful nature of his wife and his disgust towards anyone who would use her for their own means held my attention and had me reflecting on this film long after it ended.
Overall, this isn't an incredibly entertaining movie for the general public but I do think it is a great film for certain audiences who can appreciate the modern retelling of an old classic. By the end of the movie I was anxious to learn the fate of the characters. I appreciated the use of foreshadowing that was highly impactful and satisfying at the end. I will probably never watch this film again but I would mention it to anyone I know that enjoys Shakespearean adaptations.
As with other Shakespearean adaptions, there are many times where you can feel the struggle of transforming a play into a movie. The story picked up the pace about a third of the way through and I found myself laughing and holding my breath in anticipation during certain scenes. The wife is a compelling character and by the end of the movie I wondered if she was intended to be a metaphor for Russia. The husband's speech to his nephew towards the end about the wonderful nature of his wife and his disgust towards anyone who would use her for their own means held my attention and had me reflecting on this film long after it ended.
Overall, this isn't an incredibly entertaining movie for the general public but I do think it is a great film for certain audiences who can appreciate the modern retelling of an old classic. By the end of the movie I was anxious to learn the fate of the characters. I appreciated the use of foreshadowing that was highly impactful and satisfying at the end. I will probably never watch this film again but I would mention it to anyone I know that enjoys Shakespearean adaptations.
Juxtaposition is great
cmamedori17 October 2022
The juxtaposition in the movie "No-More" highlights the fall of Soviet Russia with the lightening contrasts as well as the passion versus deceit. Particularly the lightening is very grim in many ways with the dark hues of brown, green, and grey and then a splash of color with a painting showcasing flowers of pink. The scene of Tamara at the mirror subtlety tells her demise as the lights which once reflected her beauty are dimmed until total darkness.
The movie is well directed to the theme of how life imitates art. The sex depicts the desires of those who seek to be released from the Russian binds of communism/socialism. The deceit in which the sex is obtained communicates the lengths some will go through to have freedom. An artfully done film that is spellbinding in that the foreshadowing keeps the viewer on the edge of their seat with anticipation of what comes next.
In giving this movie five stars it is the quality of the talent and the message projected. A very sophisticated film for the times. Review by Marms.
The movie is well directed to the theme of how life imitates art. The sex depicts the desires of those who seek to be released from the Russian binds of communism/socialism. The deceit in which the sex is obtained communicates the lengths some will go through to have freedom. An artfully done film that is spellbinding in that the foreshadowing keeps the viewer on the edge of their seat with anticipation of what comes next.
In giving this movie five stars it is the quality of the talent and the message projected. A very sophisticated film for the times. Review by Marms.
Dark, honest, eerie with beautiful camera work
johnmyers-3692219 October 2022
The 2018 Israeli-Ukrainian film No-One, directed and written by Lev Prudkin and Vladimir Prudkin, brings to light the grimy, unclean party of Soviet society present in the global superpower shortly before the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Amidst the distress of a crumpling political system, in which some characters are directly involved, the film intertwines marital disloyalty with the inklings of political unrest. Produced in 2018, the film is eerily accurate at times, reflecting the sad reality that would, at times, turn out to be true in 2022, with the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The film by itself is eerie, at times making the viewer uncomfortable with long pauses and stiff, awkward exchanges between characters. Given the circumstances of the plot and the setting, I believe this move was not only accurate but deliberate for the general feel of the movie. The directors did a fantastic job at reflecting the simmering distrust and discomfort planted within the hearts and minds of the average Soviet citizen, with concern on the horizon about the well-being and existence of the state, and of the lives of its citizens. Especially for the characters involved in politics, the presence of the unknown is almost like the Grim Reaper, present in most scenes, lurking in the background or seemingly creeping up behind the main characters, waiting to strike. In a way, this figurative Grim Reaper affects the viewer too, causing him or her to grow anxious, waiting for the scene to end, and thus relieve the built-up pressure and suspense caused by this relationship. The dim colors and often spotty light heighten this effect, this mood of death creeping around the corner, never completely out of sight. Even in sunny scenes, such as when the characters are seen on the beach, there is still a strong sense of distrust and stiffness. Again, I believe that this is a deliberate, as well as a smart move by the producer, as it really seals the deal on the discomfort the characters feel given their situation.
At just under two hours long, this movie does drag on at times, and although the effects caused by this add a layer of depth to the situation, at times the movie is unnecessarily long. The opening scene, mainly an interaction between two of the main characters, Oleg Sergeyevich, General of the KGB and his nephew Vlad, holds importance to setting the stage for the rest of the film, although it seems excessively long.
In terms of production value, and of the quality of the picture during the scenes, I feel this film does exceptionally well. Dark angles and sharp contrasts create a stark scene in almost every part of the movie. Even when the sun is out, there is not significant stress present, the producers make the setting uncomfortable, almost inhabitable. In scenes where the viewer would traditionally expect something, for example a laugh or some form of communication, this film is silent, emotionless, and dim. In a way this is presumably realistic, especially in the Soviet Union during this time. In some sex scenes, the mood is barren of emotion, sometimes just showing two naked bodies after finishing to convey the meaning of what happened instead of showing. This causes a cold feeling, almost a shiver in the spine, to see how mechanical and robotic an act like this can be when done amidst sad circumstances.
Despite the ending becoming predictable after watching about half of the movie, due to the general tone and mood of the plot up to that point, the ending still manages to emit an additional groan of pain. Like a Shakespearean comedy ending, the characters appear to get what they deserved for all of their desperate, fleeting attempts to find meaning and purpose in their crumbling life and country. In a film where power is taken rather than given, the main characters of the plot find that their happiness, it seems, cannot be taken. Despite all of their attempts to find meaning through lust, deception, and disloyalty, they all, for the most part, meet the same fate.
Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily-accurate movie. Although the length and boredom of some scenes detract from the overall score, the honest and wonderful camera work made this movie worth the watch. 7/10.
The film by itself is eerie, at times making the viewer uncomfortable with long pauses and stiff, awkward exchanges between characters. Given the circumstances of the plot and the setting, I believe this move was not only accurate but deliberate for the general feel of the movie. The directors did a fantastic job at reflecting the simmering distrust and discomfort planted within the hearts and minds of the average Soviet citizen, with concern on the horizon about the well-being and existence of the state, and of the lives of its citizens. Especially for the characters involved in politics, the presence of the unknown is almost like the Grim Reaper, present in most scenes, lurking in the background or seemingly creeping up behind the main characters, waiting to strike. In a way, this figurative Grim Reaper affects the viewer too, causing him or her to grow anxious, waiting for the scene to end, and thus relieve the built-up pressure and suspense caused by this relationship. The dim colors and often spotty light heighten this effect, this mood of death creeping around the corner, never completely out of sight. Even in sunny scenes, such as when the characters are seen on the beach, there is still a strong sense of distrust and stiffness. Again, I believe that this is a deliberate, as well as a smart move by the producer, as it really seals the deal on the discomfort the characters feel given their situation.
At just under two hours long, this movie does drag on at times, and although the effects caused by this add a layer of depth to the situation, at times the movie is unnecessarily long. The opening scene, mainly an interaction between two of the main characters, Oleg Sergeyevich, General of the KGB and his nephew Vlad, holds importance to setting the stage for the rest of the film, although it seems excessively long.
In terms of production value, and of the quality of the picture during the scenes, I feel this film does exceptionally well. Dark angles and sharp contrasts create a stark scene in almost every part of the movie. Even when the sun is out, there is not significant stress present, the producers make the setting uncomfortable, almost inhabitable. In scenes where the viewer would traditionally expect something, for example a laugh or some form of communication, this film is silent, emotionless, and dim. In a way this is presumably realistic, especially in the Soviet Union during this time. In some sex scenes, the mood is barren of emotion, sometimes just showing two naked bodies after finishing to convey the meaning of what happened instead of showing. This causes a cold feeling, almost a shiver in the spine, to see how mechanical and robotic an act like this can be when done amidst sad circumstances.
Despite the ending becoming predictable after watching about half of the movie, due to the general tone and mood of the plot up to that point, the ending still manages to emit an additional groan of pain. Like a Shakespearean comedy ending, the characters appear to get what they deserved for all of their desperate, fleeting attempts to find meaning and purpose in their crumbling life and country. In a film where power is taken rather than given, the main characters of the plot find that their happiness, it seems, cannot be taken. Despite all of their attempts to find meaning through lust, deception, and disloyalty, they all, for the most part, meet the same fate.
Interesting, longish, and thought-provoking, I enjoyed this unique and eerily-accurate movie. Although the length and boredom of some scenes detract from the overall score, the honest and wonderful camera work made this movie worth the watch. 7/10.
Slow collapse of relationships and Soviet Union
Sarahbober-830-11580311 November 2022
The movie No-One was one for some, not for anyone! Some people might turn the movie off right after the first scene. It's not what I expected. Before that, there is a slow written reel as in all of the Star Wars series setting the scene. As I did not know much about the Soviet Union collapse, having this information was very helpful in understanding this period.
I typically am not one to watch a movie in a different language or about war, but I decided to give it a shot since I had seen that it won multiple awards. It was very professionally filmed. The actors were excellent and well-chosen. They were believable, you grew to know each character. They did a great job teaching the audience about each character, most were pretty unlikeable in my opinion. Some of them were also pretty dull, but that might have been the intention of the film.
I did like the way it was filmed, it was very visually appealing. It has a nice flow and a fantastic choice of music.
I was able to follow along with the subtitles and not miss any details. There were a few times, in the beginning, I needed to pause, back up, and re-read what they were saying because I had a hard time following along when I hear Russian in the background. Eventually, I got the hang of it and was able to follow along easier. You still have to pay close attention though so you do not miss any important parts.
It seemed way more of a romantic drama film, which confused me after reading the synopsis and seeing the first scene having nothing to do with war. It will grab the attention of some people, or make them run!
An action scene more war-related would have grabbed my attention assuming what I read from the synopsis. After the first scene, you see two men, and things start to change into discussions of war. There are lots of twists and turns, blackmailing, affairs, and betrayal throughout the film. There were not any battle scenes as I expected in a typical war movie. There was still plenty of drama though. Overall, the main focus of the film was more on the sexual affairs going on rather than the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union collapse was more of what was going on during that period. Some scenes seemed to linger on way too long. The conversations just kept going, which was very hard to keep my attention with their quiet voices and dull tone. I had to go back a few times and listen again because they had lost my attention and I had no idea what was going on. Eventually, something would happen to reel me back in. There is way too much dialogue and not enough action in my opinion. It gets stale here and there. The conversations are a bit slow and do not have many expressions. Lost my interest multiple times. I think after reading the summary, I had the assumption that there would be more action as with most war movies, but do not be expecting that. There were a few things "action" scenes that happened but nothing compared to the focus on sexual affairs.
As with any movie, there are positives and negatives. The big negative for me was the lingering, dull conversations. The storyline is very creative, well thought out, and intriguing, but it could have been a little more had the dialogue been more than expressionless. You have to pay attention as you will be reading the subtitles (of course unless you speak Russian) the entire time. Once the General starts to learn all of the ways he is being betrayed by the people around him, as a viewer, I am hoping the whole time that he gets the revenge he should.
I would recommend it to someone they are looking for a foreign film, to watch and have an interest in drama, love, and a little bit of war. Give it a try, and take my thoughts with a grain of salt. Just check it out and see how it all plays out! I would say it is worth a watch.
I typically am not one to watch a movie in a different language or about war, but I decided to give it a shot since I had seen that it won multiple awards. It was very professionally filmed. The actors were excellent and well-chosen. They were believable, you grew to know each character. They did a great job teaching the audience about each character, most were pretty unlikeable in my opinion. Some of them were also pretty dull, but that might have been the intention of the film.
I did like the way it was filmed, it was very visually appealing. It has a nice flow and a fantastic choice of music.
I was able to follow along with the subtitles and not miss any details. There were a few times, in the beginning, I needed to pause, back up, and re-read what they were saying because I had a hard time following along when I hear Russian in the background. Eventually, I got the hang of it and was able to follow along easier. You still have to pay close attention though so you do not miss any important parts.
It seemed way more of a romantic drama film, which confused me after reading the synopsis and seeing the first scene having nothing to do with war. It will grab the attention of some people, or make them run!
An action scene more war-related would have grabbed my attention assuming what I read from the synopsis. After the first scene, you see two men, and things start to change into discussions of war. There are lots of twists and turns, blackmailing, affairs, and betrayal throughout the film. There were not any battle scenes as I expected in a typical war movie. There was still plenty of drama though. Overall, the main focus of the film was more on the sexual affairs going on rather than the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union collapse was more of what was going on during that period. Some scenes seemed to linger on way too long. The conversations just kept going, which was very hard to keep my attention with their quiet voices and dull tone. I had to go back a few times and listen again because they had lost my attention and I had no idea what was going on. Eventually, something would happen to reel me back in. There is way too much dialogue and not enough action in my opinion. It gets stale here and there. The conversations are a bit slow and do not have many expressions. Lost my interest multiple times. I think after reading the summary, I had the assumption that there would be more action as with most war movies, but do not be expecting that. There were a few things "action" scenes that happened but nothing compared to the focus on sexual affairs.
As with any movie, there are positives and negatives. The big negative for me was the lingering, dull conversations. The storyline is very creative, well thought out, and intriguing, but it could have been a little more had the dialogue been more than expressionless. You have to pay attention as you will be reading the subtitles (of course unless you speak Russian) the entire time. Once the General starts to learn all of the ways he is being betrayed by the people around him, as a viewer, I am hoping the whole time that he gets the revenge he should.
I would recommend it to someone they are looking for a foreign film, to watch and have an interest in drama, love, and a little bit of war. Give it a try, and take my thoughts with a grain of salt. Just check it out and see how it all plays out! I would say it is worth a watch.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
