Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Immaculate
24 September 2001
Why this film didn't perform better in the box office: I don't know! Why this film was forgotten by critics in a matter of weeks: you've got me! Why this film didn't win the Oscar for best cinematography: I give up! But what I do know is that after seeing `Snow Falling on Cedars' for the first time last night, I couldn't have expected it to be so intensely sweeping. I knew it was made by Scott Hicks, the acclaimed director of `Shine.' I knew it was shot by Robert Richardson, the A-class DP who shoots most of Oliver Stone's films. I knew that it was adapted from a best selling novel that won praise all over the world, but for some reason I had never been driven to see it. The film is on so many levels a masterpiece.

One of the things that I liked most about the film was the backdrop in which it was set: a small little fishing community in Washington State, set during the time period of post WWII. This backdrop was what aided the lust cinematography and remarkable set designs. The viewer was able to establish a clear picture of what it must have been like to live in a small little west coast marine town full of Japanese inhabitants during a racially clouded time period. The sequence which best fulfills this, is when all of the Japanese families are taken to concentration camps. One of the moments which tore into me was when the officers came to Hatsue's house and took all of their Japanese influenced belongings and arrested her father. As the officers are leaving the house, one of them stops on the porch and takes down a Japanese chime. It is truly disheartening to see their culture disappear in the blink of an eye. The scene played out beautifully, and it most importantly summed up the Japanese position in America at that time. One could easily make an entire film on the subject of not how the Japanese treated us during Pearl Harbor, but instead on how we treated them in our own country.

Near flawless, and full of some of the richest and purist images to have ever been put on film, Scott Hicks has crafted simply one of the best-looking films ever made. Virtually every shot in the picture is filmed with precision and style, yet never dulling the viewers attention, not even for a moment. I had never realized how good an eye Scott Hicks has had before. I personally hope that his collaboration with Richardson will remain constant for years to come. The first fifteen minutes of the film is an example of the amazing beauty which the two achieve together through the lens of the camera, as are the flashback sequences with Ethan Hawke and his lover Youki Kudoh as children.

One of the things that didn't work for me was Ethan Hawke's character. For the first hour of the film, his character kind of hovers above the storyline as it unravels and the plot begins to thicken. He only has about ten lines throughout the first act, and I consider this to be the film's main flaw. Ishmael's character is supposed to be one of the central drives of the film, and it is he who is in love with the defendants wife and he who should be who the audience sympathizes with. However the audience simply doesn't know anything about him for them to care. His past is hardly mentioned, except for the scenes between him and Hatsue. We don't know exactly where he stands in his field: is he a good newspaperman or a lousy one. Pretty much all we know about his character, is that he has to live in the shadow of his father, and he is madly in love with a woman who doesn't love him back. Also the supporting players do a good job especially that of James Rebhorn and Rick Yune. I recommend this film to others and especially people who like good movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Wildly original
6 July 2001
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** A.I. is maybe the most interesting, ambiguous, lyrical, beautiful, emotional, haunting and innovative film ever made. I don't know if I will ever be able to fully understand its genius. I saw this film with about six other people last night in NY, and I was literally the only one who liked it. I felt alienated, like David, that I was the only one who was able to fully receive the remarkable buzz of the film. I just still can't believe how emotionally satisfying the film was. While watching A.I., I experienced new emotions that I had never felt before, a familiarity I hadn't encountered from a film since last years Crouching Tiger. I was completely pulled in from minute one.

For me, the first act was the strongest, because the way the story was told, during this point, was the most unconventional and indescribable to me. Every scene between Osment and O'Connor are just so rich and believable. They have an incredibly internal chemistry which I haven't scene in a while. The one scene where O'Connor first programs David with the seven-digit code is just so tense and touching. The moment where David `comes to life,' and says mommy, and then camera cuts to a CU of O'Connor's reaction, just totally killed me, like so many other moments in the film. The scene which ends the first act, where Osment is abandoned in the woods by his mother, is also another scene which completely effected me. Haley during this scene is simply fantastic, but the real gem in the scene is O'Connor as we watch her unfold and collapse as she tries to abandon her child. You can completely feel her internal struggle and the audience experiences every emotion which she does. The second act kicks in with a strong change in mood as Spielberg takes us to the inside of a hotel as Jude Law tries to seduce a woman for one of the funniest scenes in the picture. This again shows Spielberg's incredible range. I have to say that from here on the story is a lot more conventional, up until the end, and you can kind of feel where Spielberg's inner style comes in. The film continues to enthrall, but it does it in a more typical way.

The final 20 minutes is where the film kind of derails, and becomes a bit too sentimental, but nevertheless maintains its impact. I have spoken with many people who think that the film should have ended with David staring at the Blue Fairy, and that is probably where Kubrick would have ended it if he had directed, but Spielberg does not like to leave his audiences dangling, so he threw in the end. This didn't bother me as much as it did other people, but I can understand where they come from. The final scene between David ad his mother is just so incredible that Spielberg knew it had to remain in the film, but the way which he got to that scene just didn't really work. The fifteen minute gap between where David looks at the angel and the final scene is sort of relentless and lacks texture, but nevertheless it is still visually interesting. I am glad that this sequence with the aliens was included though, because it was so haunting and eerie that it also inspired new emotions. It reminded me of the final scene in 2001, where the pod lands in the old man's house. Both scenes are just utterly creepy, and unfathomable.

Apart from the plot and its elements, the rest of the stuff is just golden. The acting is unbelievable. This is one of the few films where practically every performance is great. Osment is simply unbelievable. It is one of the best performances I've seen in recent years. The performance is completely believable and the believability comes from Osment's range of body-language, facial expressions and the way he delivered his lines. He makes it look so easy, and he does a great job of making the audience feel sympathetic towards him. The supporting performances are also quite extraordinary. Frances O'Connor was just terrific and the audience feels her struggles throughout the whole film. Jude Law was impressive and fun, but he's done better.

The film also works visually on so many levels. Most of this can be attributed to Kaminski's sheer talent. This is definitely some of his best work. The lighting is so diverse and moody, and it contrasts so well. During the first act it was quite amazing to watch the lighting styles change scene after scene. I loved the golden tones and hues during the warm scene's with David and his mother. These contrasted well with the brilliant colors that occupied the rest of the film, especially during the flesh fair and the trip to Rogue city. The art direction and futuristic sets also added a great deal to the haunting pull of the film. On top of these key elements and the rest of the film lies John Williams' score. He has never gone this far before. It is definitely his most restrained and daring score ever. I am only scratching the surface of this film. A.I. is a film that everyone should see at least once. It is certainly Spielberg's most interesting and different piece ever, but it is also his most off beat.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Akira the great
8 April 2001
If you have never seen an Akira Kurosawa film, then this is definately a good one to start out with. Fortress is a perfect example of what Kurosawa is capable of; choosing to make a film with a very simple but interesting plot, and including into it many different Kurosawian elements which make the film absolutely unforgettable. In this film you will find, Kurosawa's funniest piece, his honest and realistic depiction of violence, his amazingly thorough characters, his terrific sets, and of course, his masterful craft. Fortress was the influence for George Lucas' Star War trilogy; R2-D2 and C3PO were the inspiration for the two greedy farmers Tahei and Matakishi. Also, the hyper bike sequence in Jedi closely resembles the horse chase sequence in Fortress. Kurosawa's 1958 epic stands alone by itself, and captures the true essence of filmmaking.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Seven Samurai (1954)
10/10
Awesome
3 February 2001
In 1954, Kurosawa made foreign film history with Seven Samurai. Everything about this film is just absolutely terrific. The film lasts around 3 1/2 hours, and every minute of it is unbelievable filmmaking. Kurosawa's blend of stellar craft, captivating cinematography, ravishing art direction, and unforgettable characters makes this one of the most intelligent films ever made. The first hour is devoted to devoloping the many four-dimensional characters which inhabit the film throughout. When watching the film, the audiece cares for, trusts, mourns and ultimately believes every single attribute the characters have. Samurai set up the way that many action films are made today; films like Predator and Alien still work within it's boundaries. The battle scenes are terrific and the fast-paced editing is ground-breaking. If people have a problem with subtitles and long movies, then see this and your opinions will change. The sheer filmmaking of Kurosawa will not disappoint. Also see Yojimbo and High & Low.
249 out of 328 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed