Death Run to Istanbul (Video 1993) Poster

(1993 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Absolutely atrocious "home movie", despite the sexy martial arts babes!
gridoon5 February 2006
It won't take you more than five minutes to realize how bad "Death Run to Istanbul" is. Production values, acting, plotting, sound mix, "action" choreography, etc. are all pitiful. Most people gave it 1/10, and I don't blame them. However, I have a soft spot for women who practice martial arts, and this film has three of those, so I'll give it a 2. Just two trivial observations:

1) Don't believe the title. The people who made this film barely had enough money to shoot outside their neighborhood, much less in Istanbul.

2) Near the end a unknown music band appears out of nowhere and plays a song. I assume they were friends of some cast or crew members, but I hope they didn't seriously think that appearing in this film was going to be their "big break".
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Warning, Beware, Stay Away
Bogmeister8 August 2005
I must begin with an admission, which will explain my warning. I only checked this out because an acquaintance of mine is in this, uh, movie. You must take my warning seriously - there is no other reason to see this. None whatsoever. Ignore this warning at your peril. I get the impression of a small group of people getting together on this project, maybe they all go to the same martial arts school. All fine and good; they get a video camera and then proceed to make the worst possible concoction of video images. There's an early chase scene, but both the pursued and pursuer content themselves with jogging it out; the pursuer even starts to walk at one point; then they're jogging again. In the so-called fight scenes it looks like the participants didn't realize the camera was on and were just practicing; then they ran out of video and had to go on to another scene. The choreography - I think someone's credited for it; I hope he or she wasn't paid. It's one of those cases, a guy is hit in the stomach and grabs his knee in pain. The dialog - kind of a nineties Ed Wood feel to it. But Ed Wood was kind of funny. Not this, no, not this. Heed my warning, my friends, for we will all live in the future of this.

It's no surprise I was never clear on the plot or the point. The main character owes money to local thugs and is a druggie. So he spends a lot of time jogging away from them. I believe it's the L.A. area. It also looks like some portions of scenes are missing; either they ran out of video or didn't care to complete the job. But the, uh, movie is too long as it is. You know that old saying about 90 minutes of your life you'll never get back? I always thought that attitude was taking things too seriously - it's only bad movies - so what, right? This, uh, movie changed my mind. This can be very serious. If you watch this, it may sour you on movies for a few weeks, sort of like throwing up after drinking too much vodka one night. I almost forgot: no mention of Istanbul in the actual, uh, movie. No death run either; just some jogging.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Be afraid, be very afraid
Wavion6728 April 2003
Some movies are bad, and as such are enjoyable if for no other reason that they are easily ridiculed. Or, that its clear that the producers intended the movie to be bad, and did not take it seriously. This movie is beyond bad, it sucks on a level I have rarely seen before, and the actors clearly think that they are in some high budget "A" film. The creature in the movie, which I believe was a body building Ru-paul, was probably the most disturbing part of this movie. The only movie I can think of that was decidedly worse was a movie called "Flight to Danger". I had the misfortune of buying "Women who kick butt", a 5 DVD 10 movie set on clearance. I'll have to see if the remaining 8 movies are the same sort of drek as these.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
dear lord, this movie is bad.
Nullness3 March 2003
Now, I've seen my share of rather bad movies. White Fire. Carnival Magic. Friday the 13th part 2, Super Ninja Zombie Master, The Mexican, etc. So I think I have a lot of backing when I can come out and say this is really a waste of a lot of things. Talent is not one of these things. No talent is wasted here, because there is no talent. I don't know how the women of this company (of the three "movies" I've seen by this company, Flight to Danger, Street Angels, and this one, two were written by women, and subblimate some hokey feminist values, i.e., R.A.D. funding, ugly women and "stud" guys)...are on. I don't think they expected much from these films, but they'll live on forever on DVD thanks to Brentwood (yay brentwood!). I don't know where to begin. This "movie" is just a mess. A total and complete mess. I've had more concise and clear acid trips. Let me just list a few of the "films" biggest problems: -long, borring, unaudible and visually unapealing scenes. -random, borring "martial arts" fights. -incoherent "plot" (if it even has one- guess what, nobody ever goes to istanbull!) - scene continuity (ugh, where to begin- second to last scene you can hear the director say "cut!", girl is shown escaping, but then shown still captured in next scene) I'm getting flashbacks just thinking about it, so I'm going to stop now, but believe me when i say i could write a 100 page paper on why this thing is a complete disaster (not that i plan to). It was a sort of funny movie in its baddness, but it really is quite bad. The coolest part of the film was the underused big-muscle mamma "Kat". If you want to have a good time, read the back of the brentwoods "women that kick butt" dvd synopsis of the movie, then watch the movie and see how much they flat-out lied to you (I still love you Brentwood).
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stunningly bad
manman2 January 2003
Just to point out some details: the cast is not exactly talented, there is basically no story (falling asleep while you carry a full briefcase of drugs? escaping from a flat and then staying to hang out in the street just one block from there?), continuity is

missing (there is a swimming pool sequence with lots of people in one scene and basically no one in the next one), props are useless (a tv remote control as a mobile phone), and camerawork is just awful (wait for 4 seconds for a car to arrive in the scene?).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Death Run To Istanbul is fascinatingly junky!
tarbosh2200031 August 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The most we were able to discern is that a guy named Gary Yaeger (Thomas) once was a kickboxer, but fell on hard times and became a heroin addict. He owes a ton of money to a gangster baddie named Alonzo (Ballis, who also appeared in the classic Geteven in 1993). Alonzo realizes he's basically homeless and has no money to pay his drug debts, so he offers him a deal: Get a cache of drugs to Istanbul and he'll wipe out the debt. Seems simple enough. But when the briefcase with the contraband inside goes missing, largely thanks to a middle-aged, balding Motorhead fan, Gary finds himself in deep trouble. So his next move is to get help eliminating the baddies from his ex-girlfriend and fellow kickboxer Sammy (porn performer Fallon). Along with Gary's sister Lola (Doench of Double Deception fame), the two exercise (and exercise and exercise) some girl power on L.A.'s most ineffectual bad guys. What will happen to the DEATH RUN TO ISTANBUL? You've gotta hand it to Vista Street Entertainment. They're perfectly willing to release what are essentially family home movies to the wider market. Found on the "Women Who Kick Butt" DVD collection, Death Run To Istanbul, which technically qualifies as a movie, can now have a life into the foreseeable future. It seems to have been shot with a standard, consumer-issue camcorder, and without adding any after-market sound equipment. This is another one of those "alien" movies, in the sense that it appears that writer/director Rachel Gordon had decided to make her own movie without ever having seen one before. She likely just landed from an alien world in 1993 and decided to try her hand at filmmaking, only having heard of things called "movies" on her home planet.

That's why some of Death Run To Istanbul is fascinating - seeing people speak and behave in odd ways, and watch endless scenes of practicing, exercising and even coffee-making, just happens to be strangely interesting. And at only 72 minutes (though it feels longer), it doesn't tax your time too much. Besides, it's still better than green-screen, CGI garbage of today, and it doesn't have that annoying blue-green tint so many modern movies have. There are some trained Martial Artists here, unlike so many other movies (handy tip: if you see an unintelligible Asian man wearing a vest and no shirt, run away).

The whole thing starts with a montage of things we're about to see, and ends with another montage of things we've just seen. Some of these things include a mob boss who looks like John Waters (and is about as threatening and intimidating as John Waters), a hulking female brute who appears to be a transsexual, and a band called The Daze. We're not sure which is scarier. At one point, the end credits list The Daze as "The Band". Perhaps this is what they were singing about when they wrote "The Weight". Whoever typed the credits also listed someone as "Fight Coor". Either the budget (?) ran out, or the fight scenes were planned out by an empty beer can.

We've tried to be as fair as we could with Death Run To Istanbul (which, misleadingly, was shot entirely in the L.A. area but made a stab at sounding international), and a mean person could point out that pretty much every aspect of it, from every technical standpoint to anything else, isn't up to par. However, it acted as sort of a "demo tape" for Ms. Gordon and some of the other people involved, launching their careers. But the real trick here is this: Don't compare this to any other movies you've seen. If you do that, you'll think it's bad. Just treat it as its own thing - from the parallel universe of SOV's that Bleedingskull.com is always celebrating. Don't expect quality; expect a strange, amateurish project, and you MIGHT find something worthy of your 72 minutes. But don't get your hopes up.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"Death Run-" ..to turn this off!
kirkbroadhurst1 August 2004
Problems with this are:

  • Comic-bookesque dialogue with poor delivery and unconvincing, stilted interactions.


  • 1-dimensional characters with unclear motives. General disorganision in shooting. i.e. Camera-mans shadow, by-standers.


  • 10,000, 15,000 or 50,000 dollars needed? Well, what's the difference anyway... Why does the main character run so slowly!!!!?


  • This movie is practically a show-reel for some mediocre martial artists who have mistakenly dabbled in speaking parts.


  • Shot with a consumer-quality handi-cam.


  • Inappropriate use of music.


  • And, inappropriate use of music.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed