Journey to the Center of the Earth (TV Movie 1993) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
The Pilot for a Fortunately Never-Produced Series, Robbing the Jules Verne Title But Not the Plot
briantaves16 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
In the wake of the dreadful 1980s mistreatment of the Jules Verne classic by Cannoon, next few years, several other studios considered making movies of Journey to the Center Of the Earth, but the only result was further mishandling. On February 28, 1993, NBC premiered a new two-hour television movie entitled JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH, which had even less relation to the novel than the Cannon duo. The modern plot related how an enthusiastic university professor, Harlech (F. Murray Abraham), dreams of discovering enormous caverns beneath the surface by traveling into the shaft of an active volcano. However, after entering the nuclear-powered craft he has invented for such travel, it apparently explodes upon the first attempt to descend. His nephew carries on with the idea, forging an uncomfortable alliance with a wealthy industrialist to build a new, improved craft, which succeeds in arriving underground and conveying its passengers through mysterious domains. This JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH is, in fact, more of a remake of UNKNOWN WORLD, building on Edgar Rice Burroughs's mole concept to solve the most problematic notion of the Verne story for modern audiences--how explorers could walk to the Earth's center--by offering an outer space-style craft to expedite their journey, while still pausing outside the ship for the encounters with early humans and primitive animals that Verne had included.

Direction by William Dear was capable, especially considering the trite script by David Mickey Evans and Robert Gunter; producer was John Ashley, with Dear, Evans, and Dale De La Torre as executive producers. Actually, the new television picture, hastily completed and broadcast with a minimum of publicity, consisted of two pilot episodes of a projected series. As a result, the film concludes in an open-ended fashion, as the craft goes forward to continue finding new realms (in episodes presumably never filmed).

Many of the elements contained in JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH were conventions of science fiction. Pollution threatens to render the surface uninhabitable, and the subterranean world offers the possibility of a new home for humankind. Horrific crawling manta-ray style monsters and a missing-link race of early man called troglodytes provide further danger. In an update of 2001--A SPACE ODYSSEY (1968), there is a Hal-style onboard computer that not only has a personality, but a holographic face of its own as well. An evil Darth Vader-type creature, kept alive through artificial means and reminiscent of the STAR WARS trilogy, tries to thwart the explorers. (A brief shot as he falls into the lava shows him wearing the same ring as the nephew gave Harlech before his apparent death, perhaps indicating Harlech was transformed.) Both this creature and the expedition's scientist, played by John Neville (in the only dignified role), are trying to complete a lost computer chip puzzle that forms a book of knowledge from the time of Atlantis. A lovable Tibetan abominable snowman joins the group, which also includes other stereotypical representatives meant to form a microcosm of humanity: a strong female spelunker, two women scientists, an explosives expert, and an angry African-American.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Journey to the Center of the Earth: Again, this is not Journey to the Center of the Earth!
Platypuschow22 February 2019
Okay, this is getting old now. I'm binge watching Jules Verne's classics, namely 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, Mysterious Island and Journey to the Center of the Earth and let me tell you a lot of writers have gone into business for themselves over the years.

What I mean by that is just how few are actually following Verne's work, most use the concept/title and little else. This made for TV effort barely takes the concept and is really just in title only.

Feeling and ending like the pilot episode of a Scyfy original television series it has little to nothing to do with Verne's work and is another example of creators taking liberties with time tested material.

We see a group of adventurers visit the center of the earth via a mole machine and a volcano and it erm.....flies, for some reason. While down there they come across Harry Henderson, vampire slime bat things, cavemen and an evil faceless foe who speaks in a voice that would be cheesy even by 1980's kids show standards.

Sadly the cheesiness doesn't end there, the performances are the over the top, the sfx are exactly what you'd expect for the time and the whole plot is yet another mockery to Verne's classic.

If you're seeking an adaptation of Journey to the Center of the Earth this very much needs skipping over. If you're looking for a cheesy dumb 1990's scifi movie starring Tuvok from Star Trek Voyager and Lurch from the Adams Family then this is the film for you.

The Good:

90's nostalgia novelty

The Bad:

Awful cgi

Has little to do with Jules Verne's work

Needlessly cheesy

Incomplete
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
TV movie is both appalling and laughable
Leofwine_draca8 August 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A dismal kiddie-oriented science fiction adventure film which is utterly forgettable and lame in comparison to the 1959 fantasy classic with James Mason. Although the film sets off well with a foot firmly planted in seriousness and attempted realism, things degenerate so far that we end up getting silly monsters running around and fighting or befriending our team of B-movie heroes. Everything is bigger in this film in comparison to the original classic; there's a ludicrously large ship which resembles a spaceship (which leads one to beg the question, why wasn't this made simply as an outer-space epic?), there's a huge cast of explorers, a PC-friendly multi-ethnic group, most of whom are extraneous to the plot, and the special effects are more elaborate. In fact ALL of the explosions and backdrops are entirely computer-generated, and look cheap, fake and not-for-one-moment realistic. What happened to the matte paintings of the older days? At least they beat this pixelated rubbish hands down.

There's a square-jawed and utterly BORING blond-haired hero guy, played by a worthless non-actor; a jock; a blonde-haired female lead who ISN'T a bimbo for a change but might as well be; a spectacled Chinese professor woman who doesn't actually do anything other than cook a bit of food; the tough black soldier-type who repeatedly goes off the deep end but pulls through in the end, and a female rock-climber who only seems to be around to display ample cleavage. The only actor of note in this mess is A STUDY IN TERROR's John Neville as the stereotyped upper-crust British guy (there aren't any guys around like him anymore, folks) who manages to scrape through without embarrassing himself too much, putting a tongue-in-cheek performance with plenty a raised eyebrow. Also appearing in brief cameos at the opening of the film are F. Murray Abraham as a bearded professor and Sam Raimi as his assistant.

As the film sinks deeper and deeper into unrelenting silliness, more fantastic plot elements occur. There's a race of flat fish-type aliens that have glowing green eyes (achieved by someone shining a green-tinted light blub inside their eyes - yes, it's THAT cheap), a sickeningly cute Bigfoot-type hairy Yeti monster (the director made HARRY AND THE HENDERSONS, go figure) who joins the crew and is played by the guy who was Lurch in THE ADDAMS FAMILY movies, a stupid female computer head which floats around in a bubble, a race of troglodytes who are not nearly as interesting as the name would suggest, and to top it off an ugly monster humanoid which is kept alive through tubes and wakes up at the end of the movie to reveal that it has a human face - obviously they ran out of money for a mask then. The humanoid says things like "Invaders from the Overworld" and "For three millenia I have been left to suffer in this Hell" which gives you some idea of just how scary this guy is. To add insult to injury, there's no ENDING to this film either, instead just a "to be continued" type approach with our explorers jetting off to another adventure. I at least thought they would discover what happened to Abraham or escape back to the surface, but the credits just roll suddenly and leave you incredulous, as does much of this appalling television movie.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dreadful & awe-inspiring at every turn...
Malc-35 November 1998
Hysterically awful TV update of the classic story clearly (or hopefully) wasted most of its budget on beer, because the special effects stretch to little more than a bloke in a bizarre furry white suit and a dizzily-whizzing, chirpy female head in a bubble (which may remind Brit viewers of a certain recent Building Society Ad). And F. Murray Abraham's in it! It's less than a decade since the Oscar, for God's sake, 'F'! But its fun. GREAT fun. Watch it AFTER the pub, as I'm ashamed to say I did not, and its a classic.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
BAD!
tomslaps6 October 2002
Really from 1993?! The special effects indicate that it could be an end of 60's movie. Awful creatures. Bad "Drilling machine" that look like some enormous Phallus. The evil fish looks like some candy children eat, and the worst of all must be the effect/spiral they use to go from one scene to another. This guy should never be allowed to make any movies, unless it was meant as some bad joke.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Save yourself! Avoid this!
RNHunter1 August 2006
This movie at first looked like the simplistic movie that could be entertaining on a Saturday afternoon. One never thought it would be great, but the hope was there for a pleasant if not simple few hours.

This movie could not even achieve those simple explanations. The movie started with some good scenes and some interest. But after a bit the acting seemed to grow much worse. The creatures looked sort of like people in gorilla suits - who also seemed to be guilty of bad acting. The Plot seemed to quickly drift downward into filling up time. Awful. It is hard to imagine a movie that is not even good enough to take a nap to, but this one seems to hit that level.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible horrible horrible
jeremythegenius23 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Yes I gave this movie (and I use the word movie loosely) a chance yesterday evening on Movie Mix. After half an hour of watching this mind numbing rubbish I started to contemplate what has my life become? The acting was wooden, special effects hopeless and dialogue was cringe worthy and laughable. From the scene where the Professor crashes his craft into that volcano to the scene when that big furry friendly monster 'Dallas' turns up, this film is terrible. The scene with that alien being strapped to a table doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Anyway do not waste your time watching this movie it is absolute rubbish.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Pathetically horrible
jclem5 August 2001
This movie shames the original and takes script-writing to an all-time low. Some of the effects were interesting, but the dialog was so bad and the characters so stereotyped, I couldn't finish watching it. 35 minutes was all I could tolerate.

Unless you enjoy really bad movies, avoid this one entirely.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst film i've ever seen.
IAMISYOURMUM29 December 2001
complete turd, as someone already said the characters are _incredibly_ stereotyped. just WHY did they have to throw all events that made the book original and interesting out the window - and replace it with ideas they stole from a todler at a nursery.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unsold pilot
alexpreston31 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I watched it, despite it being appalling. I was at least waiting to see they they resolved everything and managed to return to the surface.

Then the film ended. All still unresolved and underground.

Apparently it was a feature length pilot so they were just setting the scene for a series to follow.

Needless to say no-one bought it and the series was never made.

It was bad. They spent about £1.25 on the musical score, most of that was rental on a bad synthesiser on which they pressed the dramatic sci-fi chords button.

The acting wasn't terrible, and the yeti character looked quite convincing.

But the special effects were feeble. But the worst aspects of the film are the plot and the script. Truly abysmal!
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
bigger budget equals better show
jwmetzger16 December 2002
I liked the movie, but would like to see it developed more, maybe with more mature writers. I would like to see it turned into a series. I'm a science-fiction fan, and someday I would like to write or narrate a revised script for this movie or other movies of a similar type. I think they did pretty good for what they had to work with, but maybe could have done better with a bigger budget.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Irwin Allen-style fun in failed pilot
mickdansforth26 December 2021
This originally aired on NBC around the same time as the first Babylon 5 pilot movie, early 1993.

Both were pilots that hopefully would land series, but only Babylon 5 got a series.

NBC was aiming at Star Trek underground. That fall they launched Star Trek underwater instead with SeaQuest.

They built a semi-diverse team. Built in some lore and a lot of mystery. The creature effects are practical and fun. The ship/tank thing looks like it was designed by Toho. There's a lot here and it's all great fun.

And the beginning of the film we get F Murray Abraham doing his best Daniel Jackson a year before Stargate and 8 years before Milo in Atlantis The Lost Continent.

Also Sam Rami (Spider-Man, The Evil Dead, Army of Darkness) has a tiny role as he travels with Abraham in his first drill-ship.

There's plenty of movies that are relatively faithful to the Jules Verne book, most or all of which are fun. This was supposed to be a TV show, aboard a subterranean ship with a crew. It was never trying to be anything else.

I watched this when it first aired and loved it. Now decades later I rewatched it on Prime Video and loved it all over again. Currently it's just free w/ subscription. Hopefully it gets a purchase option because I would love to purchase it so I can watch it again after it's no longer free w/ subscription.

If you are down for adventure fun with rubber monsters, this is a good time. But also a little sad because there is no more.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Vote 1! You Can Do It!
Shaun4517 July 1999
I've seen many, many movies in my time. Many were very good, and many were very bad. Then there was "Journey to the Center of the Earth". Of all the films I've seen in my 21½ years of existence, I've chosen "Journey..." as the worst that I have ever seen. Okay so it was a TV movie. But still, a mess of a picture like this shouldn't be allowed to waste people's time like it did. It aired 6 years ago (on NBC) and it still lingers in my mind of how distasteful and laughably silly it was. Poor F. Murray Abraham. He went from winning an Oscar to landing a brief supporting role here. Also, I am currently trying to get "Journey..." on the IMDb "bottom 100 movies" list. Please, if you could help, vote for this film, even if you haven't seen it, and give it the biggest 1 you've ever given in your life! Please??
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It's OK
rachelshekinahrose12 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was OK. I moved rather slowly in pace, but then a lot of movies from the 90's did. The acting was decent, however not perfect. I could tell the actors were trying. The story was pretty good, but the effects were low budget.

The ending isn't a very concluding (they're still stuck down in the middle of the earth). I can understand why, because this was supposed to be the pilot for a T.V. series. Sadly it didn't fly beyond that.

I actually like the film. It has some of my favorite actors in it and the story/writing was pretty good. Like I said though it's not perfect, it's not even up to par with the other Journey movies, but it's still OK.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
One for the young ones to enjoy on a wet afternoon
DoctorThotcer29 April 2020
I was drawn to this as I recognised Tim Russ from Star Trek: Voyager (1995) as is at least one of the special effects guys, and a lot of folks doing reviews don't seem to get what this is so I thought I'd chip in.

This is a failed pilot for a sort of live action cartoon in the manner of something like Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (1993) but I'd guess aimed slightly older. It's full of simple character archetypes and comic book style ideas and action pieces, the villain is even voiced by voice actor Frank Welker using his "Dr. Claw" voice from Inspector Gadget (1983) so it's obviously not aiming to impress any high brow critics, and even though it does make a few jokes clearly aimed at watching Mums and Dads, it's obviously meant for a much younger audience.

It has a lot going for it, decent model work, props, make-up and animatronics, a lot of the creatures look pretty cool, but it's let down a lot by the rather shonky video effects, but I guess they were impressive enough back then.

It's a shame it wasn't picked up as a series, as with a bit more money thrown at the effects and a few script and character tweaks it could have been a fun sci-fi for the younger generation of the time. As it stands, it's just about watchable and I'm pretty sure younger kids would enjoy it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst movie I've ever seen..........................ever.
ManiacCop10 February 2006
Wow, this is the worst movie I have ever seen. 3.3? No, more like a 0. Seriously, I have watched literally hundreds of movies that are considered 'bad.' But this one is the worst. It's not even funny bad, it's just bad, really really bad. I'm vomiting just thinking about it.

These lines: "sonic bores blind folded" or, "I needed to make sure this ship survived, even if I didn't." Oh, there is the patented black guy, the bad guy in a suit, the old doctor, the 2 hot chicks, and the ugly one, the voiced over ship girl (T-Minus 10 minutes). Oh, and then there are the scenes where they talk to this girl in a floating orb, only none of the actors are even looking near the orb.

God I have a headache now. I have to watch Bad Santa to feel better. Yea, that's what i'm going to do.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I'm so SICK of the "Dr. Claw" Voice given to EVERY BAD GUY!!
oftend4 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Since the early 80s, it seems the only way to convey a "bad guy" in a sci-fi movie is to use a guttural, speaking-while-burping, type voice most commonly associated with Dr. Claw in the cartoon version of "Inspector Gadget". That voice is SO PLAYED now that I literally have to just stop whatever is using it and walk away because I find it so annoying and irritating. This movie had a chance, albeit a tiny one, for me as I enjoy sci-fi with a good larf to it but that chance evaporated as soon as the "bad guy" made his appearance and sounded like Dr. Claw. It's weak, stupid, trite, LAZY and awful. NO MORE DOCTOR CLAW PLEASE!!!! Please, God, PLEASE!! LOL What a star studded cast too. Justina Evans, who's been associated with all things silly, was a nice add. Poor John Neville, who must have rued the day he signed the contract for this A-Bomb, could have saved this. And my favorite, Tim Russ from "Star Trek: Voyager" - who also could have saved this.

Why did this potential serial fail? First, because they went with a script that had no ending! Even if you plan on sequels or an entire TV series, the big "crisis" that draws the audience in has to have some kind of resolution with an obvious hint that more such adventures are to come. This movie just dead-ended with plot holes everywhere you could drive a truck through. Second, the special effects were just god-awful. "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" was out at this exact same time and even with a different nose prosthesis for each species separating out the various space characters (Note to Star Trek, be more creative please! Tentacles shouldn't be out of the question), the special effects in DS9 were infinitely better than this piece of dog doo! Honestly - drooling, fanged-manta-ray puppets?! C'MON! Last, BORING! This was so god awful boring and silly and hokey and just inspidly stupid it never should have seen a millisecond on air. Worst movie EVER! (And I sat through all of "Howard the Duck" - IN THE THEATRE!) You know what's really sad? To date, the 1959 version of this title still sets the high bar. Even the most recent production wasn't as interesting to me as the original. Sad.

I gladly give this a 1. They got it the old fashioned way, they EARNED it. *grin*
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worse than the Alien From LA
dominic-3513 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie recently on late night cable. It has to be the worst adaptation of Verne's work ever. And to make it even worse, it has the stench of pilot all over it. The open ending leaves me in no doubt that someone intended this to become an ongoing series. Thankfully that didn't happen.

The plot was a jumbled mess. The acting was bad. The science in the science fiction was non existent.

Here's an example of the stupidity. They meet a yeti. He doesn't speak English so they quickly rig up a headset translator for him. After about a minute he takes the thing off and now can somehow speak English without it.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I'm sorry, but it was not worth it
Harry-9827 April 1999
"Journey to the Centre of the Earth", the name brings to mind one of the world's best sci fi writers. And what do the Americans do to this pearl of literature. RUIN IT! I am surprised that the Jules Verne estate don't have an automatic chance to preview all films carrying the name and say whether or not it should be shown at all. My vote for this film:

Special Effects 5 Cast 3 Plot -2

Overall average 3.4 out of 10
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Jaw Dropping Flabbergasted-ness!
DanzWMe2 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
What the F did I just waste 92 minutes of my life watching? This was apparently a made for TV pilot that thankfully & rightfully didn't get picked up.

A professor decides he wants to explore inner earth, builds a ship, drops & dives it head first into an active erupting volcano & to the surprise of only him & the idiot who went along with him is killed upon impact with the exploding hot lava. His nephew then decides 10 years later to build another ship & follow in his uncle's footsteps to explore inner earth.

I was flabbergasted to see this was released in 1993 because based on the sets, costumes, creature effects, SFX, script, acting, props, plot, directing, production quality, & cinematography one would surely have thought it was made in 1962.

It's awful on all levels. It started out interesting with hopes of a good story being told but somewhere quickly into production, they obviously ran out of money FAST!

I'm left scratching my head on every level of this crapfest.

The best part that would have made this a good movie, made you want to watch it, & that they should have expanded upon came at the end of the movie when it's revealed that the underworld villain was actually the uncle who started the 1st expedition & was thought to have been killed. He falls into lava at the end & you see his hand rise up to reveal he's wearing the same ring his nephew (the new expedition leader) gave to him the day he/the villain/uncle left for his doomed expedition.

Stereotypical characters - stupid scared overzealous African American wanna be tough guy; hot chick rock climber with zero contribution to a science expedition other than to be the hot chick in the movie; ditzy Asian chick who contributed nothing to expedition, plot, or story; unconvincingly passing for straight & badly indicating machoness horn dog type guy; the

I'm sorry, I really can't even finish reviewing this! I refuse to waste any more time on this F-Fest!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Reminds me of my misspent youth
ralphv113 September 2021
The only thing really surprising to me was that it was filmed in the Nineties and not thirty or forty years earlier. It was quite reminiscent of the films I used to sneak into the neighborhood theater to see on Saturday afternoon. Lots of action, outlandish characters, unbelievable situations and even cheesy swirling scene changes. It doesn't seem to pretend to be anything but what it is, and what it is is not bad,for what it is.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A fond memory from childhood
Monumental_task26 July 2002
My grandparents taped this movie off the TV and gave it to me, and I must have watched it 10 or 15 times. I remember it quite well, with its lame plot twists and bad graphics, it was like watching the ultimate cartoon. Don't ask questions, because explanations that don't exsist just spoil the fun.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A bizarre, unwatchable, neofascist piece of trash
hfisher-914 May 2006
The reason I give this made-for-TV piece of neofascist trash a 1 is that there is no zero to award. For those of us who remember Professor Lindenbroek, Pat Boone, and Arlene Dahl in the great original movie, this piece of TV crap is unutterably boring and cardboard-like. In addition, this creation, if it can be dignified by that word, tries to connect to the current zeitgeist by featuring a bunch of young, uniformed people who communicate to each other through pseudo-military-speak: "That's an affirmative!" "Roger that!" and similar gung-ho utterances. The creators of this timewaster are kissing up to the military mania that is currently sweeping America, not unlike the case of Starship Trooper. The difference is that it is done even less well and more blatantly. When this movie comes on, switch to the weather channel for better entertainment.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What's this????
reiss-ferlance26 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
What is this movie, its so-called "Journey to the Centre (Center) of the Earth. I've seen the 1959 adaptation of Jules Verne's Journey to the Centre of the Earth, I watched on BBC2 on a Saturday, and I liked it. But this- What's this???? I can't compare this adaptation to the book since I've not read the book, but I can compare it to the 1959 adaptation. This movie will definitely not be in my top 250 movies.It's an unexciting adventure with only fair acting, The special effects are almost bad and this probably bears little resemblance to the novel, it definitely bears little resemblance to the 1959 movie. Let's compare this movie to a movie completely different "Carnival Of Souls" (1998) that movie I would choose over this.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Very Bad Movie
Skynet-TX17 October 2005
The only thing that good in this film are the two blonde girls who have pretty faces. I tried to figure out what this film was about, but I failed. If anyone knows just answer me. The original movie's runtime was nearly 3 hours, this film's length is only 90 minutes. I think it tells everything what you can expect. In some scenes it's like Flash Gordon, but even that was better than this. This film is not finished, but I hope, it never will be, because the second part can only be worse. Don't waste your time watching this film, unless you like one of the actors very much, and you want to see every film he/she appears in. Watch the original instead.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed